CreateDebate


Debate Info

2
1
Agree No problem
Debate Score:3
Arguments:8
Total Votes:3
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Agree (2)
 
 No problem (1)

Debate Creator

Apolline(197) pic



Attacking Christianity is a great way for the left to lose minority support

Agree

Side Score: 2
VS.

No problem

Side Score: 1
1 point

I agree. That's WHY I don't attack Christianity. MOST REAL Christians are good people. The large number that aren't are one reason I couldn't be a Christian. The political evangelicals that would take over this country and turn its Constitution into a Biblical, "Sharia type" law NOT supported by the majority, is enough to attack! The religion, itself, is not under attack from the left, there are as many left wing Christians as there are right wing, and they are more "Jesus-like"!

I don't attack ANY religion, just the attempts they make to control the masses.

Side: Agree

This debate is racist. Not all minorities are religious.

Side: No problem
Apolline(197) Disputed
1 point

Blacks and Hispanics are much more religious statistically than whites.

http://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/racial-and-ethnic-composition/

Good luck attacking Christianity lib.

Side: Agree
AlofRI(3263) Clarified
1 point

"Blacks and Hispanics" are mostly "libs", WHY would we even THINK of attacking them!??? As outlaw would say, "stupor stupid"!

There is SO much CRAP on the internet, I don't see WHY the right leans toward it, constantly, for "facts"! Maybe it's because they are so excited about "fake news"??? (As I would say, … STUPID!)

Side: Agree
Amarel(5560) Clarified
1 point

If there is a statistical majority of minorities that are religious, then that's simply a matter of fact. Statistics aren't racist. It's not the same as looking at an individual minority and assuming religious affiliation.

If there is not a statistical majority, then the OP is simply incorrect, not racist.

Side: Agree
Amarel(5560) Clarified
1 point

Yeah, well insults are not arguments. Maybe you should go find some evidence to back up your claims.

If I hadn't already been banned, I would have up-voted this.

Side: Agree
Blood(217) Clarified
1 point

If I hadn't already been banned, I would have up-voted this.

He literally made the retarded claim that FDR was a "far left authoritarian" without providing any evidence and then whined about my supposed lack of evidence. Your only motivation for upvoting him is that he is both retarded like you and saying something annoying and stupid to me.

Side: Agree