For one thing, absolute power does not absolutely corrupt.

Also, no, a woman is not always behind every corrupt person. What evidence is there to prove that EVERY corrupt person in history had a woman backing him or her whom was just as evil?

I dont think so that behind every corrupt person there is a women,

For instance behind the system of monetary was there a women? while this is the biggest corruption and many more corruption... I dont see why a women should have something to do with that corruption if she doesn't get a benefit from it as the person itself.

Hence behind every corrupt person the is the wrong meaning of success because they try to do everything for success and it is not always just for a women. But instead for power and recognition

If this hadn't been in all caps I would have swore it was a joe_cavalry debate before clicking on it. But no, I don't think that's a correct statement... 'many corrupt people' possibly but not every.

Stop reading MacBeth!

Behind every corrupt person is a corrupt motive. If you are corrupting something that totally deserves to be corrupted, than by all means do so; and if it for a woman, you're a sweetheart.