CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:7
Arguments:9
Total Votes:8
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
  (6)

Debate Creator

Cushmack09(7) pic



Banning Bible From Schools

I need help with this subject: Do you think it's RIGHT to ban The Holy Bible from schools around the world, even in the United States its wrong to have The Holy Bible inside school biuldings Am I wrong to say its not right to ban Gods HOLY BOOK in my schools but not with EVOLUTION?!?!?!?!?
Add New Argument
2 points

Am I wrong to say its not right to ban Gods HOLY BOOK in my schools but not with EVOLUTION?!?!?!?!?

Hello C:

Yes, you are wrong.. Here's the deal.. RELIGION should be taught IN church, and SCIENCE should be taught in school. Never the twain should meet.

If you don't wanna learn about science, that's cool.. There's plenty of private schools that will indulge you..

excon

1 point

So, is info on the new gender pronoun library "education", "science", or neither? Do tell.

Yes, you are wrong.. Here's the deal.. RELIGION should be taught IN church, and SCIENCE should be taught in school. Never the twain should meet.

I agree. Cultural Marxism should never be mixed with science, nor should it prevent science, yet the left can't help but do both.

If they can put Marxist literature everywhere, they can put a Bible everywhere.

AlofRI(3294) Clarified
1 point

This time, I agree with you. If someone WANTS to study Marxism OR the Bible, it should be available as an elective subject, or as a part of a course. Neither should be "required" except as general courses on history, religion, politics, etc..

I also agree that books on Marxism AND the Bible should be available everywhere books on related or opposing religions or theories are found. Nothing should be banned. It's usually religions that do the banning because they fear opposing thought.

2 points

This time, I agree with you. If someone WANTS to study Marxism OR the Bible, it should be available as an elective subject, or as a part of a course. Neither should be "required" except as general courses on history, religion, politics, etc..

I also agree that books on Marxism AND the Bible should be available everywhere books on related or opposing religions or theories are found. Nothing should be banned.

You wanna hug me right now, eh Al?

It's usually religions that do the banning because they fear opposing thought.

Right. That's why Conservative speakers at colleges are either banned completely or have to pay thousands of dollars for security when Farrakhan and Iranian leaders need none to speak and attend.

1 point

I'm not for "banning" the Bible from schools. I'm not for using as a text book, either. It's fine to have one on the library shelf as a reference book. Even as a book someone can go to if they feel the "need". There should also be the books of other religions (AND Atheism) with it for the same reasons.

I AM for using books on evolution as text books, because it's a study of science.

If the Bible IS used as a text book, all other religious books should be used in that class, unless of course, it's a designated Christian school where people went to learn ABOUT Christianity.

The Constitution forbids "ONE" religion in public schools. Public schools are for ALL religions … or none.

Nothing in the Constitution forbids the study of a science. That's the way the USA was founded. USA! USA!

1 point

Any ban on the holy book will not be taken lightly by that guy Gideon so watch out.

To be serious though, such an action would be self defeating as almost always banning something makes it more powerful and sought after.

Such a radical move could very well spark the renaissance of Christianity, especially among our godless youth.

1 point

RELIGION should be taught IN church, and SCIENCE should be taught in school

the only problem is ... when Science points to God ... THEN what do you do ?

But then, I'm sure the existence of a designer (God) can be recognized without teaching any religion