CreateDebate


Debate Info

41
31
Yes, this should be changed No, the site is fine as is
Debate Score:72
Arguments:76
Total Votes:94
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes, this should be changed (36)
 
 No, the site is fine as is (25)

Debate Creator

WastingAway(340) pic



Banning and responding?

Okay so my question is more just a way that I think the site should be changed in regards to banning. The way I see it, if you ban someone and then respond to their position, they should have the option to respond back. I think that past that they could do nothing else on the debate, and that if the debate moderator DIDN'T respond to the banned debater's position, then they (the banned debater) couldn't say anything else.
If you think this is a good idea, say why. If not, the same.

Yes, this should be changed

Side Score: 41
VS.

No, the site is fine as is

Side Score: 31
2 points

I think that this would still uphold a person being banned from a debate, but would prevent the debate from "continuing" from exclusively one side.

Side: Yes, this should be changed
2 points

What a bunch of cry babies. You want to act like idiots, then cry when you get banned and can't respond in the debate you misbehaved in. If I get banned, I just shrug and move on.

Side: Yes, this should be changed

Yes, once the debate creator has, childishly placed a ban on someone, then no further reference should be made to, or about the excluded respondent. The rules should be fine tuned so that only certain ''unsocial conduct'', such as the use of profanities, can be used as a reason for banning. Em, the only problem with that is I might get banned quite regularly. I only have issues with those who idiots who disagree with me.

Side: Yes, this should be changed
1 point

The act of banning should have a more strict cause definition. I have been banned for disagreeing with someone, not for abusive treatment. And THAT after the verbal abuse came from the banner, not me. Apparently , disagreeing is "verbal abuse" to many.

Side: Yes, this should be changed
Saintnow(3684) Disputed
1 point

Whenever I ban you, it's because your bitterness is stinky.

Side: No, the site is fine as is
1 point

Here's an illustration. You are implying that God is no better than you. You are insisting that your life is justified and you do not deserve the punishment of death any more than you deserve Hell. You did not ask to exist, and now you have to die, and it's not fair for God to bring you into a dying existence, therefore you insist He is not there because He is not being good to you...and God cannot be God if He is not good.

Now, compare that to your behavior here. You did not ask for me to exist, therefore you believe you can prove me stupid if I ban you from my debate....after by creating the debate, I brought you here. It's not your fault if you are being obnoxious, it's my fault that you are obnoxious here because I created the space allowing you to come in. Then you parade around like a fool saying I'm stupid if I ban you, and you think I'm going to tolerate your foolishness forever? I'm trying to draw you in to see that the faith of God is logical, reasonable, and good and all you are doing is insulting me.

Banning you here is an illustration of what you are facing in death between you and God. Your rebellion against God, your sin, separates you from God. Your attitude against me separates you from me. If you push the limits of God's patience and refuse to believe He loves you so much that He died for you, paid your price with His won blood, and rose from the grave offering you pardon and victory over death, the way out of sins imprisonment ....you refuse to receive Him as your Savior, He will eventually run out of patience with you for trampling the blood of His Son under your feet, and you will be forever banned from life where there is no sign of His goodness, only the sign of wrath which He suffered for you in death, and that is the fire of Hell burning in God's wrath against sin for those like you who refuse His love and finalize their rejection of God in death.

Does that sound like a reasonable argument?

Side: Yes, this should be changed
1 point

Ew, you are word vomiting about stupid stuff again. Why do you bring god into everything ?

Side: No, the site is fine as is
Saintnow(3684) Disputed
0 points

Why do you want to try to make God go away and leave you in Hell alone?

Side: Yes, this should be changed
1 point

What a bunch of cry babies. You want to act like idiots, then cry when you get banned and can't respond in the debate you misbehaved in. If I get banned, I just shrug and move on.

Side: No, the site is fine as is
Cuaroc(8829) Clarified
2 points

You say you move on yet you respond to 100+ day old posts from people that you've banned.

Side: Yes, this should be changed
GodMyMaker(12) Disputed
2 points

That is the problem people do not need to misbehave in your debates you ban people that you have nothing to come back at them with.

Side: Yes, this should be changed
Saintnow(3684) Disputed
1 point

If this were my debate, I would ban you now for insulting me, and I would say that my choice of banning you is similar to God running out of patience with sinners and ending their time in the place where it is possible for them to know His goodness and leaving them in Hell like eternal sausage frying in the burning dump forever.

And then after I banned you, I would probably make a similar comment to add under your post each time I saw your annoying and worthless remark making cheap graffiti where I had hoped to generate productive discussion. Whoever you are, I hope you know that your sins are forgiven and you are on your way to heaven without a doubt. If not, I can tell you how you can be sure.

I hope you found this response to be an adequate comeback to your worthless comment.

Side: No, the site is fine as is
-4 points
Cuaroc(8829) Clarified
2 points

If you want your debates to stop being copied all you have to do is stop banning people from your debates.

Side: Yes, this should be changed
Cartman(18192) Disputed
1 point

It is the people who come to a debate website to debate that want to change the banning rules. We came to createdebate, not createblog.

Side: Yes, this should be changed
Saintnow(3684) Clarified
2 points

That is the problem people do not need to misbehave in your debates you ban people that you have nothing to come back at them with.

Side: Yes, this should be changed
FromWithin(8241) Disputed
1 point

yes, we come here to debate and is why I ban so many who lie, deceive, use vulgrity, etc. etc

Side: No, the site is fine as is
Saintnow(3684) Disputed
1 point

99% of those you ban do not use profanity and do not lie.

You just freak out when people disagree with you.

Side: No, the site is fine as is
Saintnow(3684) Disputed
0 points

You said you are the god of you, and can ban anybody whenever you have a bear.

Side: No, the site is fine as is
admiralbacon(229) Clarified
1 point

I'm torn. On the one hand, I do like the idea of restricting how FromWithins banhammer gets swung about, but on the other hand I love seeing them make a new debate, ban everyone on it, then make another new debate because they got lonely. It's kind of like watching a kid throw a tantrum over some trivial nonsense, then throwing another tantrum when nobody pays them any attention.

Side: Yes, this should be changed
FromWithin(8241) Clarified
1 point

I'm torn on whether I should ban someone from another country that has no clue of how America works but acts like he does.

You have not been automaticaly banned but it sounds like you would like to be.

Side: Yes, this should be changed
1 point

99% of those you ban do not use profanity and do not lie.

You just freak out when people disagree with you.

Side: Yes, this should be changed
FromWithin(8241) Disputed
1 point

total hogwash........................................................................................................

Side: No, the site is fine as is