Black holes or black stars?
i read a very recent article in a scienc magazine that says that quantum effects during the cooling of the collapsed star forms a black star that, instead of radiating energy, absorbes radiated energy and matter, since energy and mass relations are true!
And the event horizon arises as a solution of the Einstien's equations that are at the heart of his theory!
So, is there a possibility of this theory to be true!
Black hole, I say!
Side Score: 4
|
 |
No, They are black stars!
Side Score: 4
|
|
|
|
|
The effects of this so called quatum theory doesn't hold treu or has failed to explain the still unknown particles that are supposed to be very simple as a photon! It has even failed to bring out the particles of energy other that light's! then how the damn can i believe that this is a true one! It is a pity that the author of that article is not a fairy tale writer! Side: Black hole, I say!
|
1
point
I think block-holes are due totally to gravity and not quantum. Quantum Theory only become significant at the very small in accordance with the correspondence principle (wikipedia that). But I difference with meaning the spacial theory relativity (see my debate: "Does Time Really Change?" this would spill over into the general theory of relativity as well. So the that black-holes are really black stars but not because of quantum theory. Side: No, They are black stars!
|
