Book first or movie first?
Was curious as to what order people tend to consume media that exists as both a book and a movie.
Book First!
Side Score: 15
|
Movie First!
Side Score: 9
|
|
|
|
1
point
books first I always like reading it before I seeing it. please vote !!! http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/ Side: Book First!
Book first! This is because while we read we develop an image of the characters and then when we watch the movies our characters come to life. Secondly, watching the movie first puts a banner on our imagination but going for books we imagine wild. Moreover, for me its real fun to point out every single tiny miny mistake or variation in the movie. Lastly, I would say that the small details in the books give us the proper and the best view or idea about the characters and their personality. Side: Book First!
It depends on what type of media your prefer and which media came first. Assuming most books precede movies: Reading a book gives you a personal interpretation of a narrative. Watching a movie gives you someone else's interpretation of a book. Based on my own experiences, books tend to be better than movies. So, I would read the book first because it provides the better narrative. I can watch the movie later to see someone else's interpretation of various elements in a book. Side: Book First!
1
point
1
point
It seems to me that the answer is actually very simple, but buying books or reading them has long been much more profitable and easier. Personally, for example, I read constantly only from the site https://freebooksummary.com/ Side: Book First!
1
point
I think it's still worth reading the book. After all, the book is a primary source. I used to want to be a writer, but now I just work at WriteMyessayToday https://writemyessaytoday.us/ It helps me not lose my writing skills and help students at the same time. But I think I will still write a book that will definitely be made into a movie Side: Book First!
|
3
points
I was once a proponent of reading the book first, but I've changed my mind in recent years. My reasoning is: When I read the book first, and then watch the film, I can't help but notice all of the things that were truncated or left out entirely to fit into the movie format. On the other hand, when I watch the film first, I can look forward to a wealth of additional detail when I read the book, with the added benefit of being able to easily visualize each character et al. Of course, some may be better than I at imagining the appearance of a character based on the description, so I may be lacking in that regard. Furthermore, there have been a number of casting choices that I feel are very misguided in the world of film. Even so, given my experiences, I cast my vote to Movie First. Side: Movie First!
1
point
Like thousand1, I used to be the other way around. These days though, I don't read many books and I tend to be pickier about books than movies. So I like at the movie as like a cliff-notes sort of version of the book. If it impresses me and people who have read it give me more reason to be interested, I'll consider giving it a read. Side: Movie First!
1
point
Step into a domain where lights dim, curtains ascend, and ardor for cinematic storytelling flourishes on our movie-viewing portal. It's not merely a compilation of films; it's an immersive encounter that transcends genres and eras, beckoning you to engage in discussions that metamorphose into a collective celebration of the art form. Your forthcoming movie night is not just a casual affair; it's an exploration of cinematic storytelling in its untarnished form. With just a tap, you're transported into a domain where https://kinogo-la1.biz/ lights dim, curtains ascend, and the enchantment of movies takes center stage. Are you prepared to be part of this cinematic journey, where every frame transforms into a piece of art? Side: Movie First!
|