Call of duty black ops vs Call of duty world at war
Not sure
Call of duty black ops
Side Score: 14
|
Call Of Duty World At War
Side Score: 11
|
|
|
|
2
points
1
point
1
point
1
point
|
2
points
2
points
2
points
1
point
Either one I'm Beast at i can no scope quick scope on both games all night longg and my Kill streak on world at war is now 60. black ops i only have a 55 killstreak but i go them both from sniping ( Springfield and l96A1) Sooo yeah,.. Also on modern warfare it's ok but they took away the fun with all the overpowered weapons Side: Call Of Duty World At War
1
point
0
points
1
point
1
point
WAW in this case though its pretty shitty. They went from COD 4 backwards which wasnt good. Im voting WAW simply because Black Ops was AWFUL. Seriously, the graphics were strange and distracting and the storyline was boring an confusing. The multiplayer was fun for a day until you realized just how bad they fucked it up. The mechanics were shit, guns were underpowered in general. They RUINED sniping, no not cuz you couldnt quickscope (at least without going negative by a ton), but because they NEVER 1 shot. Plus you could line it up on a kids chest perfectly and miss. The perks were all useless except for a couple. The costomization was all hype. I hated seeing ghile suits runing around the whole map with SMGs, it was stupid. Knifing was retarded due to lack of any lunge and the ability to hit anything. The killstreaks were insanely overpowered and frankly, quite anoyying. Black ops was an utter disaster compared to any other cod except for maybe COD 3 cuz as far as im concerned that game never happened. The only, and i mean only good thing that came from black ops was zombies. Period. I wouldve just paid 60$ for zombies Side: Call Of Duty World At War
|