CreateDebate


Debate Info

1
1
Yes Social Democracy Requires Authoritarian Rule
Debate Score:2
Arguments:2
Total Votes:2
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes Social Democracy (1)
 
 Requires Authoritarian Rule (1)

Debate Creator

Slavedevice(1393) pic



Can Marxism work in Democracy?!

I personally support certain social projects like basic health care.  But sometimes I’m afraid people must be controlled more to conform to the system.  I’ve seen how lazy people can be.  I also think democracy is a MOB RULE and I don’t believe democracy is very efficient/slooowwww!  I favor some sort of SMART RULE.  The top 10% should be the ruling class.  Much more efficient 

Yes Social Democracy

Side Score: 1
VS.

Requires Authoritarian Rule

Side Score: 1

Democracy is the only condition in which Marxism can work, and Marx himself wrote about this. Marx specifically professed of the dangers that a coup would simply bring about a new form of dictatorship, and Lenin ignored him.

There is a good book about the true path to Marxism written by a man called Paulo Freire, entitled Pedagogy Of The Oppressed. In summary, the main theme is that the goals of Marxism may only be attained through a process of education. Most people are politically ignorant and it is not their fault, but rather the fault of the guardians of the present system who intentionally distort and manipulate information in favour of their own ideology. Freire -- much like Marx himself once did -- argues that socialism can only achieve success when the population has become enlightened enough to reject the myths of capitalism.

Side: Yes Social Democracy
1 point

Anything can work because any country can and many do, pretend to be a democracy.

Side: Requires Authoritarian Rule