Clemens: Guilty or Not?
Liar, liar, pants on fire?
Guilty
Side Score: 9
|
Not Guilty
Side Score: 1
|
|
|
|
2
points
1
point
0
points
He is definitely guilty. There is no way that he hasn't used steroids during his career. Every other player that was named in the Mitchell Report has come back and admitted they used it "once or twice". Clemens still vehemently denies it, although his testimony was about the least convincing thing I've ever seen.
Side: Guilty
|
I don't think there's any way that he's guilty. If he were guilty he would have just admitted it like the rest of the guilty people did. He knows there's no / little backlash if he said he was guilty off the bat, so why would he go to such lengths to defend himself if he was really guilty?
Side: Not Guilty
1
point
1
point
|