The meetings are local

I see. You go for that decentralized kind of socialism that Gandhi supported in India, which kept them in poverty until they abandoned it.

In their national meeting, how will they account for the needs and desires of each individual? Seems like a forever meeting.

They would be, because they would be smart enough to know why it's important.

And if they aren’t, I’m sure some smarter folks can make sure they do what they are supposed to. That or it all just falls apart because anarchy doesn’t work regardless.

Why would you want profit when all you have to do is run the shop and you can just have whatever you need?

Whatever I want; or whatever I need? Because people actually need very very little.

Why the hell would I bother with the shop if I already can have whatever I want/need?

We would constantly be keeping track of everything using computerized monitoring systems.

Nobody will provide upkeep of those systems. They weren’t in Marx’s time anyway. Seriously, information provided by the price mechanisms of markets is imperative. That’s why Russia always relied on the prices of the west to signal how much supply should meet their demand...and they always got it wrong because communism is economic illiteracy.

Keep in mind this would be in the future as well

So long as it’s never in the present, it’s not a problem. The present is where practical matters get very much in the way of communism.

But what if no one uses money?

You don’t need money to sell things. You just need something that someone else is willing to trade you for.

You should have showed up for the meeting

Oh I did. But the needs of everyone cannot be hashed out in a discussion by everyone. So by the time it was my turn to be heard by the collective, we were all dead from old age.

people who don't use money who can get what you offer for free.

Nobody does anything for free. If they do something, it’s in response to an incentive. Under capitalism, the incentive is improvement. This is abolished under communism, so the incentive becomes avoiding a negative. If you better produce for free, or the collective will make you.

No, they do what they do because it keeps civilization going

Like I said, the kindness of his heart. “Why bread? Well to make the world a better place of course”

and contributes to the massive abundance they get to experience as long as they contribute to it.

Why would he not experience this massive abundance and just skip work that day? The abundance is there whether he works or not, so why go to work ever?

But people like you would be living in some enclave preaching about the "good old days"

That enclave was called “The West” during communism’s century of massive failure.

when millions of people were in poverty

Which is hundreds of millions less than what communism could offer.

rich people to exploit, bully and lord over us.

If you are being exploited in some way, you should report it to the police. Fraud is a crime. If, on the other hand, you don’t like the guy you’re trading with to help you make a living, stop trading with him. You can leave. That’s economic freedom. When you are compelled to produce for free by “the collective” that’s slavery, which is the history of communism.