CreateDebate


Debate Info

7
8
No place for conscience here. Doctor's choice.
Debate Score:15
Arguments:8
Total Votes:20
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 No place for conscience here. (3)
 
 Doctor's choice. (4)

Debate Creator

Saltal(196) pic



Consciencious objection to aboration by doctors should be banned.

Personal beliefs have no place in medicine and such a practise would favour Christians while discriminating against other religions and atheists. 

No place for conscience here.

Side Score: 7
VS.

Doctor's choice.

Side Score: 8
1 point

Women's lives could be at risk if doctors are allowed to pursue this discriminatory policy.

Side: No place for conscience here.
1 point

[ noun ] (psychiatry) a disorder in one's mental state. 3. [ noun ] (physics) an optical phenomenon resulting from the failure of a lens or mirror to produce a good image.

What is the confusion you are trying to relay here.

Side: No place for conscience here.
3 points

Banning conscientious objection would violate Doctor's freedom of religion.

Side: Doctor's choice.

So let's take this radical abortion agenda on the Left, and see how far to the extreme they have come.

Abortion has been the number one controversial issue in American politics since Roe V Wade.

What led to this decision was a result of the Left's typical strategy of scare tactics and exaggeration. We heard non stop rhetoric from the Left concerning rare hypothetical situations such as our ten year old daughter being raped, getting pregnant, and then having complications which would be life threatening.

They screamed how can we not make it legal to save her life? This sounds great doesn't it. What parent would want their daughter to die from complications of a rape pregnancy, right?

This was the scare tactics from the Left to open Pandora's box which has led to NO RESTRICTION abortions for any reason at any stage!

These rare extreme case abortions could have easily found common ground compromises between both Parties, but this is not what hard core Feminist groups in the Democrat Party wanted. Their ultimate goals were legalizing No Restriction convenience abortions.

That brings us to the subject of your debate. Not only has the arrogant Left pushed for the right to kill even viable babies for any reason, they want to force others to participate!

This is the slippery slope of radical pro abortion extremists. They would force doctors, nurses, tax payers, etc. to participate in the taking of innocent life. How depraved is that?

You may know that in the past, Republicans helped pass the Hyde Amendment which protected tax payers from funding abortions. This law has been in affect for many years, but the extremism of the Democrat Party has now influenced every Democrat Presidential candidate to state that they would end the Hyde Amendment if elected.

Can you imagine the arrogance of people who would force others to be willing participants in acts of inhumanity?

That would be akin to Hitler forcing all Germans to participate in the gassing of Jews! I'm sure there were Pro life Germans who were appalled by the Nazi's eradication of Jewish people in their nation.

The Democrat Party has been taken over by extremists, and for any person to vote for these radicals, is to willingly participate in this extremism.

Side: Doctor's choice.
Saltal(196) Disputed
1 point

Please permit me to guide you.

Pregnancies occurring through rape is quite common and is a crime which happens globally. Such inhuman crimes are committed against under age girls and women of all ages has nothing whatsoever to do with left wing politics. There are numerous actual instances where the continuation of a pregnancy would have resulted in either the death of the fetus or the pregnant women at birth, or both. In such cases only a stark raving lunatic or a Nazi 'human experimental physician' would recommend the continuance of the pregnancy.

Side: No place for conscience here.
FromWithin(8241) Disputed
1 point

Are you SERIOUS?

You are actually wasting both our time by talking about extreme case abortions? THE ONES THAT NEITHER SIDE IS DISPUTING?

You just proved my point! Your response to my post was exactly what Feminists and Pro abortion Politicians did to get Roe passed. They constantly talked about rare extreme case abortions, when their real goal was to legalize the over 90% of abortions done purely for convenience.

If you can not even muster any argument to excuse your support of No Restriction abortions, then please ignore me. I have better things to do.

I gave you more credit than that, but I was obviously mistaken.

Side: Doctor's choice.
FromWithin(8241) Disputed
1 point

I'm beginning to see the truth. You are the same vulgar bigots with a different alias, pretending to actually have a heart.

Side: Doctor's choice.
Chinaman(3570) Clarified
1 point

Pregnancies occurring through rape.

Is that your excuse for why PPH has killed 40 percent of the African American population.

Side: No place for conscience here.