Contest of wits: Who is smarter, Noam Chomsky or Jordan Peterson?
Noam Chomsky
Side Score: 5
|
right wing shill
Side Score: 5
|
|
|
|
Contest of wits: Who is smarter, Noam Chomsky or Jordan Peterson? Noam Chomsky, hands down. Jordan Peterson is a "Wizard of Oz" type. Chomsky is a genuinely very bright individual. Relevant previous post from separate forum reproduced below. Note: 'right to left' is a Socialist: @right to left We may in fact agree about a bit more than may be obvious, as I have read quite a bit of Chomsky (for instance) and appreciate his views on certain areas. Now, where I fundamentally disagree with Chomsky is his view on Human Nature, most relevantly regarding benevolence given proper conditions, while I view Human Nature much more in the style of Tolkein and "Lord of the Rings". Naturally, this leads to significant differences, which can be most scene and highlighted on the topic of self-defense/self-preservation of oneself, local community, & homeland/safe-haven. "The women of this country learned long ago, those without swords can still die upon them." -Eowyn, Daughter of the KIng of Rohan, "Lord of the RIngs" by J.R.R. Tolkein Side: Noam Chomsky
0
points
|
Here is a snippet from a questionnaire Peterson filled out ...... In 2013, among his 32 answers to the question, "If you could write a rule book for being a man, what 'man law' would you write," Peterson included the following dictates: 3: Keep the sacred fire burning. 9: Offer your sons up as a sacrifice to God. 12: Consult the ancestral spirits. 16: Make a worthy temple for the Lord. 27: Bring heaven to earth. 28: Take on the sins of the world. Peterson is a tool with a large fan base of bum licking crawlers on You Tube, they hang on to everyone of his egotistical rants and elevate it to a status of brilliance. Petersen is not fit to lace Chomsky’s boots Side: right wing shill
@Mingiwuwu Chomsky's IQ is 140+ range. JP lied about his IQ terribly, which, in reality, is in the 115-120 range--as is most Psychologists. That is, Chomsky is a man of high intelligence while Peterson is a midwit. Scholars & journalists are overrun by midwits who are overwhelmingly wanna-be all-stars. Hence, the desire to manipulate, lie, fraud, exert control, etc. etc. Chomsky is able to see through it easily as his intellect is markedly superior. Also, understand, Chomsky intentionally does not speak in the rhetorical style of JP, as wizardry is an evil intended to play on ones emotions. See video, start 1min 30sec in Note: Midwit- Above average in intelligence, though not highly intelligent. Think of the negative counterpart of 'halfwit', or a dim person, though not retarded. On the spectrum of extremely unintelligent to extremely intelligent, with average in the middle, halfwit is midway between extremely unintelligent and average, while midwit is halfway between average and extremely intelligent. Noam Chomsky: Don't Seek to Persuade Others to Your Own Views
Side: Noam Chomsky
Okay, to begin with before I explain that Peterson blatantly has 135 IQ +/-3 based on how fast he is on his feet in interviews, not just preparation and depth of his content, please show me the source for Chomsky having that IQ. Chomsky would be around 110 in my estimation. Side: Noam Chomsky
|