CreateDebate


Debate Info

4
8
Facts No Facts
Debate Score:12
Arguments:10
Total Votes:13
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Facts (4)
 
 No Facts (3)

Debate Creator

BurritoLunch(6607) pic



Dana Wouldn't Last 2 Minutes With Me In A Submission Grappling Bout

She'd be getting bulldog choked inside 60 seconds. Facts.

Facts

Side Score: 4
VS.

No Facts

Side Score: 8
No arguments found. Add one!
Amarel(5551) Banned
3 points

On one side you have some anonymous woman I'll never meet. On the other side you have an anonymous man who has never met the other anonymous people of a website where he boasts of his physical ability to overpower anonymous people. All with no risk that any proof can ever be demanded of him. It's one of the few ways an anonymous person can behave like a coward online.

So my bet would be on Dana.

Side: No Facts
1 point

On one side you have some anonymous woman I'll never meet. On the other side you have an anonymous man who has never met the other anonymous people of a website where he boasts of his physical ability to overpower anonymous people.

Amarel, please explain to us why you take everything that you read literally? You don't even appear to be capable of comprehending clues that something might have been intended satirically. Were you perhaps still young when your sense of humour was surgically removed?

While you are here though buddy, I wanted to reply to another of your stupid comments I read earlier. Unfortunately, some douchebag calling himself Amarel banned me from the relevant debate. You wrote:-

If you are in favor of legalization for the purposes of regulation, would you be in favor of continued criminalization of unregulated drug production and distribution?

Am I to understand from this convoluted question that you are implying you want to socialise drugs?

Side: Facts
Amarel(5551) Disputed Banned
2 points

The first defense of every school bully is "I was just joking".

The question does not connote any value or desire beyond an answer to said question.

Side: No Facts
Amarel(5551) Clarified Banned
2 points

You were banned from the drug debate because you aren't concerned with saving lives, you only wanted to use the drug debate as a platform for character attacks and to support disarming the American populous (a completely irrelevant topic except that guns kill less than drugs and far less if you only count homicide). A disarmed population is another issue the CCP agrees with you about. I see a trend.

Side: Facts
Amarel(5551) Clarified Banned
2 points

I don't take everything literally. But it fits for you to mean this particular topic literally, based on the low character you present on CD. You are just the kind of person to make assertions of a physical nature that carry no risk for you from behind your anonymous keyboard.

Side: Facts