CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
You did notice that when that one person was copying his debates he whined because they were more popular than his own, yeah? That's what he does. He accuses and bans then accuses some more. He doesn't want to debate, he just wants an echo chamber.
Hmmm....gee...why would someone rich/famous want a bodyguard with a gun.....especially when they are in the spotlight of millions of people, many of whom are unhinged fans.....hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm can't quite put my finger on why......
You are correct? You can't put your finger on any hypocrisy from your beloved Left.
That explains why you get banned. Do you actually think I want to get responses on my debates from deceptive jokes like you?
I could not care less about all the losers wasting everyone's time. I am happy finding one honest Liberal on this site to debate with. It's very hard to find one.
I ban them just for this very reason and happily ignore all the jokes.
No, the people who responded to it were the ones YOU banned in the first place. The few who weren't banned were debating with the people who were. That's how debates work, if you ban the majority of people on this site then you can't complain that debates are happening on another page. It was more of a real debate than your pages were.
LOL, it was a debate to attack me you pathetic liar!
The people who were not deceptive liars, were confused to why there were two debate with the same title, and wondered why the idiots copying the debate had no clue of the topic.
I guess I created some great debates if those who were banned, for being deceptive vulgar childish jokes, were going to all the trouble of copying my debates and insulting me.
Gee, why not create their own debates on the issue. Oh, I keep forgetting, they had no desire to address the issue, their desire was to attack me for speaking the truth about what they supported.
You created some accusations that people couldn't respond to, not because you were right but because you banned them. And because you didn't allow them to debate, someone else did.
their desire was to attack me for speaking the truth about what they supported.
That right there is the reason you're wrong. What you think of as truth is a misguided and often wrong attempt to cherry pick a person's debate to fit your own agenda. When people disagreed with you and gave you the reasons why, you were the one that resorted to calling them deceptive fools and liars, ultimately banning them for speaking the truth about what you supported.
it was a debate to attack me you pathetic liar!.....as you whine about other's insulting you. Your hypocrisy reins supreme.
The truth is not always in the eye of the beholder.
Sometimes truth is truth and undeniable.
When a person deliberately and knowingly votes for a person who supports and keeps No Restriction abortions legal, that person is culpable and accountable for keeping No Restriction abortions legal.
Deceptive people like you will deny the truth which makes it impossible to have an intelligent debate.
There is no debating a lair! The liar simply ignores the truth, so how can there be a debate?
I've wasted my once a month quota of giving you another chance of being honest. You will never change...
Ok so if I support no restrictions abortions even though I have said I don't, then you support removing a person's right to bodily autonomy. You support being forced to donate bone marrow or blood or a kidney to save someone who needs it even if you don't want to. Good going you. We'll let the government know post haste that you've volunteered to donate anything they want and need.
The truth is not always in the eye of the beholder.
The truth is an entirely alien concept to you. Deceit , hypocrisy and bigotry are though quiet natural to you and entirely consistent with your no doubt genetic stupidity
They never get a real debate because the copied debate was merely created to attack me.
Hello again, From:
Nahh.. I don't copy your debate to attack you.. I copy your debate to DEBATE you - which is something you clearly DON'T wanna do.
What's NUTS, is that you say the REAL debate is just YOUR opinion, because I'm BANNED, and the FAKE debate is where my opinion is welcomed..
DUDE!
excon
PS> Please.. Oh, PLEASE don't accuse me sniveling because you banned me.. I wear your ban PROUDLY. As you can see, your ban doesn't really STOP me at all.. It just EXPOSES your closed mindedness and utter hypocrisy.
Leftist Jewel all you can do is whine about you being a VICTIM but then you support GUNS for the Elite !!!!!!!!! Leftist do you DUMMIES have a stance on any issue ?????????????
You just made an excuse why famous people should have guns. You say that people in the spot light deserve to have guns for protection.
Incorrect. I made a reason as to why their body guards have one. People who are typically trained to use them, much like the military.
So are you admitting that guns DO protect us from bad people?
Not too sure why this is hard for you to get but guns are a tool. You wouldn't want a hammer in the hands of a toddler would you? Why would you want a gun, a tool whose main purpose is to kill, in the hands of someone completely unqualified to use it?
Why would you want a gun, a tool whose main purpose is to kill, in the hands of someone completely unqualified to use it?
If you’ve paid attention to any of my posts on this topic, you know I am very much an advocate of the 2nd Amendment. I find it perfectly reasonable, and in keeping with the Constitution, to require basic qualifications prior to admitting a permit to carry concealed. I don’t think that position goes against gun owners rights.
That being said, legal gun owners tend to be educated and qualified. There is no requirement on private security to ensure their training (beyond any requirements on citizens). The fact that they are trained is a product of the market and a demand for quality security.
On a related note, there was a debate some time ago about a few public schools providing firearms and hunters safety courses. Pro-gun folks weren’t against this measure of ensuring people using guns are qualified. The people who spoke out against these courses (on this site) were the regular anti-gun bunch.
Do you mean like alcohol? It's funny how the Left does not require back ground checks on repeat drunk driving offenders, to save many many more lives of children.
Why does the Left not demand back ground checks when buying alcohol to keep that weapon of death out of the wrong hands?
We all had to take safety training courses before hunting for the first time. Why is it drinkers do not need to take training courses on drinking before driving their fist car?
It's always the GUN being singled out by the Left. Use your brain and understand their strategy. It has NOTHING TO DO WITH SAVING CHILDREN'S LIVES IN SCHOOLS, ETC!
B. Repeat drunk driving offenders are sent to jail or have their license suspended.
C. Seriously? Why is it drinkers do not need to take training courses on drinking before driving? It's illegal! You don't take courses on how to rob your first bank, do you? Besides, it's literally ALL over the place. DO NOT DRIVE DRUNK. They aren't going to teach classes on how to. And no, we didn't all have to take safety training courses before shooting a gun. Nor do we have to maintain licences to carry like we do the driver's license.
D. Arguing against trying to fix a problem by saying there is ANOTHER problem is a smoke screen tactic.
E. A gun's main use is to kill. That's what it's built for, that's what it does. You don't use it to tenderize meat, you don't use it to get from point A to point B, you don't use it to cut open a box. It is a weapon to kill. It's that simple. Alcohol is not a weapon of death and neither are cars, they CAN be used in combination to kill, but their primary purpose is not that.
They do the exact same things with guns as alcohol yet the Left wants more and more restrictions even though their restrictions never work.
They say DON'T KILL ANYONE WITH A GUN!
We already have have age limits on buying guns!
Killers are sent to jail!
Obviously if we have idiots who drink and drive, we need training courses to teach them, correct? This is the logic of gun hating control fanatics.
Drunk drivers still drive when their licenses are revoked. We see it all the time!
The only way to prevent this is to require back ground checks before selling that weapon of death! I don't want this. I am showing you the true motive of the Left, and it is not saving lives.
It's not a smoke screen to show you the motive behind the Left's hatred of our gun freedoms. They want to take our guns, and is why they refuse to address other issues that kill far more children then guns do.
Do you more fear a drunk driver when you child drives, or some mass murderer with a gun in schools?
Deceptive as always because you will refuse to honestly answer the simple question.
Obviously if we have idiots who drink and drive, we need training courses to teach them, correct?
Hell no, if we have idiots who drink and drive they need to stop driving. Their license needs to be revoked and they need to make besties with public transportation. Things that are already done.
Drunk drivers still drive when their licenses are revoked. We see it all the time!
Yes they do, and we can only do so much. We put devices on their cars that they have to blow in to to start it. They can work around that. We take away their licenses. They can work around that. We send them to jail and therapy....that may or may not help. That doesn't mean we should stop trying to fix the problem or stop making it illegal.
The only way to prevent this is to require back ground checks before selling that weapon of death!
Yet again, alcohol is no more a weapon of death than cars are.
Do you more fear a drunk driver when you child drives, or some mass murderer with a gun in schools?
I've already answered this in a previous debate a while ago with you. I fear both but I am more afraid of some disgruntled ass going to my child's school and being able to mass murder an entire class than I am a drunk driver. With one there is intent to kill as many as possible, with the other there is stupidity galore but usually not trying to murder as many innocent people as possible.
Do you more fear a drunk driver when you child drives, or some mass murderer with a gun in schools?
You poor Americans need to emigrate to countries where one doesn’t face a life of worrying about being mowed down by drunk drivers or gun toting citizens , no wonder yous are rated 121 least peaceful country in the world your love for guns comes at a price buddy suck it up.
Seeing as you’re now frothing at the mouth about drunks driving what about the simple truth that those same drunks have the “right “ to carry a gun or do you not have a problem with that either?
The Precious Jewel continues to defend the ELITE having armed body guards !!!!!!! ROTFFLMMFAO !!!!!!!!!!! IDIOT if it was not for DOUBLE STANDARDS you LEFTIST would have no STANDARDS AT ALL !!!!!!!!!!!!!
So are you admitting that guns DO protect us from bad people?
Oh, just stop you insane dolt. Do you admit you support a law which makes it legal to sell those bad people guns?
Why are gun fanatics only ever prepared to acknowledge the half of the story which benefits their beliefs? What about the other half, where the law makes it legal to sell bad people guns, hence making them ten times more dangerous?
Here we got us another Leftist that has ZERO INFORMATION just the feelings it carries on its SHOULDER !
The Leftist proves it does not know SHIT and it typed this - why would someone rich/famous want a bodyguard with a gun.....especially when they are in the spotlight of millions of people, many of whom are unhinged fans.....hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
You don't know that to be true but you are defending the ELITE who you claim need guns. Having a HARD time there LEFTIST on your GUN STANCE ???? WOW now i am surprised by that ROTFFLMMFAO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If I wanted to wallow in the gutter with hateful bigoted vulgar fools, I would do what you say.
I could monopolize this entire site every day with thousands of arguments from hateful jokes who play in their mommy's basements. That's not debating! It sick that you think it is.
Until I started banning people, every one of my debates attracted hundreds of responses from the bigots and fools I ban today. They stalked my every word. They copied every debate I created after I banned them.
Guess what? I have much better things to do then banter words with hateful deceptive vulgar childish fools.
Darlin', you DO monopolize this site every day with thousands of hateful jokes that you think are debates.
You also think anyone who disagrees with you is a bigot or a fool, yet you have no problems acting exactly like how you accuse everyone else of acting.
Dude! I ban deceptive fools who refuse to be honest about what they support.
I do not ban honest Liberals if there are any left. There are Left leaning people on this site that are not vulgar deceptive fools. They also do not respond to the truth.
The truth is the truth and most on the Left lack the character to admit it.
Are you denying that hypocrite gun hating Liberals have body guards with guns? Nah, you just ignore the truth and rant about being banned.
I thought you did not carer if I banned you? LIAR!
I'd love to hear this. Go ahead. Explain it to me.
It's easy. You are what we call a retard, and as a retard, you campaign for guns to be legal. Since that causes countless guns to be sold to sadists, rapists, psychopaths and wannabe assassins, it forces everybody who isn't one of those things to buy a gun in order to protect themselves from the people who are.
Would you like a small diagram to go along with that, you stupid little runt?
It's easy. You are what we call a retard, and as a retard
You are correct. Retards cannot answer the easy question proposed in the debate. Good of you to realize your stupidity. That's the first step to your recovery.
Why do Nancy Pelosi and Stephen Colbert need guns but I don't? I'd love to hear this. Go ahead. Explain it to me.
Hello bront:
It's simple math, really.
There are about 600 million guns in these great United States. Let's just say 3/4's of them are owned by right wingers.. That means 150 MILLION guns are owned by libs.. And, they NEED their guns just as much as YOU need your guns..
The notion that your guns are in danger of being collected by the libs, is nuts.. Step away from the FOX News and the YouTube. It's rotting your brain..
What IS true, is that I, EXCON, think it's time we gave up our guns.. But, I, EXCON, don't run anything..
You EXCON are the low end voters who elect these gun hating fools.
I guarantee you they will take our guns when there are enough low end voters like you. With every fake news lies, and every Hollywood gun hating hypocrite, the low end voting electorate will start being brainwashed in the lie.
If you represent the Jewish community, you might be shining a light on why millions of Jews marched onto the death trains for the concentration camps. They may have been as naive as you.
The Democrat Party will all of a sudden say they have had an epiphany and now see the light, just as Obama did with Gay marriage. We on the Right have long ago learned to ignore their deception. You obviously have not.
