#1 |
#2 |
#3 |
Paste this URL into an email or IM: |
Click here to send this debate via your default email application.
|
Click here to login and CreateDebate will send an email for you.
|
Did God put Biden here to see if the Democrats would vote for worse than Trump
Yes
Side Score: 11
|
No
Side Score: 16
|
|
No arguments found. Add one!
|
IMPOSSIBLE! NOTHING is worse than Trump! There IS a close second, though. Because HE can get away with more than Trump can (unless Trump wins the next election .... then all bets are off)! The "President" of Brazil has just surpassed U.S. in deaths per day. He is pushing exactly what his buddy Donald J. is WANTING to do! He's even pushing Hydrochloroshit! This on top of the fact that he's burning down the world's oxygen supply :-(similar to how Trump "cares for" the ecology!). Will the world survive Trump and his "buddies"?? Go play more golf DJ! You do less damage on the golf course than you do in a day in the White House! GO JOE! NO GOD would unleash a Trump (or a wannabe) on a world .... not a "loving God" anyway! Side: No
-1
points
IMPOSSIBLE! NOTHING is worse than Trump A man that sniffs women and children, can't string two coherent sentences together, lied about his degrees in college, says restricting travel from China during a pandemic is racist, illegally unmasks Americans, and says "you aint black if you vote for someone else" is worse than Trump. Side: Yes
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
As for Michael Flynn, they don't know who is being unmasked. The media are playing word games to deceive those not familiar with the process. For example, "unmasking isn't insidious or abnormal", knowing those making claims aren't making THAT claim. The odds that they miraculously unmasked Michael Flynn on a call where we are shown no transcript evidence of nefarious dealings is astronomical. Occum's Razor. They knowingly targeted Flynn and not an unknown person innocently and randomly. Side: Yes
1
point
Occam's Razor Then, here's the simpler story: Flynn talked with the Russian Ambassador during the transition and suggested how to respond to Obama's sanctions, and discussed how to vote in the UN regarding Israel. The NSA recorded the Russian Ambassador's phone calls (including Flynn whose name was redacted.) People who needed to know who was having those conversations requested unmasking the name. The NSA approved it. When questioned by the FBI, Flynn lied about the conversations. Flynn admitted to the lying. Side: No
1
point
Here a left wing outlet trying to run cover for the Obama administration and the intelligence agencies. The article: "Surveillance of Russia’s ambassador to the U.S. revealed he had interacted with an unnamed American who may have been undercutting efforts to pressure Vladimir Putin’s government." Reality: They know the casual reader won't catch that the system Iis set up to spy on foreign entities, not Americans, and that Flynn was "unmasked" while doing surveillance on a foreign entity. In other words, they hid behind the claim that they were doing surveillance on Russia, and Flynn just "coincidentally" happened to be on the other end of that call. Evidence is pointing towards them targeting him, which is illegal, rather than a foreign entity and him being caught up in foreign surveillance. Also, the leaking of this classified information to the Washington Post was and is a felony. Side: Yes
Reality You are not qualified to comment on reality because you are thoroughly and irrevocably insane. Every word which leaves your lips is an attempt to bring back the guiding principles of European fascism. Principles like, "praise the Nazis and then source the Nazis for proof that the Nazis need to be praised". Fuck off you worm. Sooner or later you will get what's coming to you pal. I guarantee it. The universe pays its debts. Side: No
1
point
"Evidence is pointing towards them targeting him" What evidence? "the leaking of this classified information" See - you might be able to read after all. It is the leaking which is the only (potential) crime that happened related to the unmasking. Not the unmasking itself. Side: No
0
points
Warrants to Spy on Trump Campaign Lacked Probable Cause, DOJ Admits The Inspector General’s Report The wheels came off the Trump-Russia collusion bus in December, when the Justice Department’s Office of Inspector General published a report titled “Review of Four FISA Applications and Other Aspects of the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane Investigation.” Michael Horowitz, the inspector general of the Justice Department, testifying before Congress, laid bare the gross deficiencies in the FBI’s investigation. Horowitz noted seven significant inaccuracies and omissions, as we wrote about here. Horowitz’s report got the attention of the FISA court. Judge Rosemary M. Collyer, presiding judge at the time, entered an order Dec. 17. Collyer directed that “the government shall, no later than January 10, 2020, inform the [court] in a sworn written submission of what it has done, and plans to do, to ensure that the statement of facts in each FBI application accurately and completely reflects information possessed by the FBI that is material to any issue presented by the application.” That’s strong stuff coming from the FISA court, especially since the rebuke was public. On Jan. 7, the new presiding judge, James “Jeb” E. Boasberg, entered another order “regarding the handling and disposition of information,” seeking detailed information about how the government planned to handle sensitive matters before the court in the future. Boasberg noted that the court had received notice of “material misstatements and omissions” in the third and fourth FISA applications against former Trump campaign aide Carter Page. Boasberg’s order referred to a letter sent to the court by the Justice Department on Dec. 9, which contained the following statement: “DOJ assesses that with respect to the applications in Docket Numbers 17-375 and 17-679, ‘if not earlier, there was insufficient predication to establish probable cause to believe that Page was acting as an agent of a foreign power.’” But Boasberg’s order contained another interesting statement. The judge wrote that “the Government apparently does not take a position on the validity of the authorizations in [the first and second FISA warrant applications regarding Page, but intends to sequester information acquired pursuant to those dockets in the same manner as information acquired pursuant to subsequent dockets.” In nonlawyer speak, that means the government isn’t using any of the evidence it may have gotten as a result of spying on Page based on any of the four FISA warrants. Who Signed Off on FISA Warrants Under the applicable rules, FISA warrant applications must be signed by senior Justice Department officials. With respect to the warrants to spy on Page, the first application in October 2016 was signed by then-FBI Director James Comey and then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates. Collyer approved the application. The second application in January 2017 also was signed by Comey and Yates. Judge Michael Mosman approved the application. The third application in April 2017 was signed by Comey and then-acting Attorney General Dana Boente. Judge Anne Conway approved the application. Finally, the fourth application in June 2017 was signed by then-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe and then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. The application was approved by Judge Raymond Dearie. The Justice Department responded to Collyer’s order with a 15-page filing Jan. 10. The response explains the FBI’s accuracy procedures in the context of applying for a FISA warrant, as well as the historical guidance provided to agents in the Justice Department’s National Security Division (who appear before the FISA court). Side: Yes
1
point
The Inspector General’s Report The Inspector General specifically appointed by Donald Trump? That Inspector General? You're utterly pathetic. You'd literally defend Hitler and send us to Goebbels for proof. https://www.heritage.org/ So to support your lies about Donald Trump you are sourcing a man hand-picked by Donald Trump and the company that hand-picked his administration staff? Are you even serious you thoroughly crooked halfwit? Funding from right leaning organizations. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to promoting misleading claims regarding global warming and the health dangers associated with tobacco. The Heritage Foundation has been described as a major influence on the presidential transition of Donald Trump and the Trump administration. The foundation had a powerful say in the staffing of the administration The Heritage Foundation has been criticized for taking positions that are favorable to the tobacco industry as well as for blocking action on climate change. Side: No
1
point
A man that sniffs women and children As opposed to raping them? And then bragging about it when he thought his mic was off? Side: No
1
point
Biden is accused of raping them I just ran a Google search. No rape allegations. Not by anybody even remotely credible at least. Busted for lying again. I read the entire article. Lol. Shut up you retarded fucking liar. It never mentions unconsensual sex, so you lied to us. "I just walk right up to them and grab 'em by the pussy." That doesn't sound very consensual to me. I think perhaps you lied to us. I think perhaps lying is all you ever do with every breath which comes out of your toxic weasel of a mouth. That's why your wife left you and it's why your kids don't speak to you. Side: No
1
point
I just ran a Google search. No rape allegations. Not by anybody even remotely credible at least. Your second sentence makes your first sentence false. Also it is credible. It's so credible that left wing Google removed the video of Larry King Live from 1993 where her mother called into the show to complain and ask for advice. Side: Yes
-2
points
He is pushing exactly what his buddy Donald J. is WANTING to do! He's even pushing Hydrochloroshit! So have scientists and the FDA. Side: Yes
2
points
And when new information refutes it, just pretend it never happened, and keep repeating: French study finds hydroxychloroquine doesn't help patients with coronavirus Study of High-Dose Chloroquine For COVID-19 Stopped Early Due to Patient Deaths Side: No
0
points
And when new information refutes it, just pretend it never happened, and keep repeating: Yes, that's the left's tactic every time one of their lies in proven to be false. And earlier the FDA, France and the WHO were touting it. That's why Al provided no timeline of who said what, and when. And as usual, if you search through left wing smear attempts, you will always find where they tell the truth late in the article in order to protect themselves from being sued for libel. Your link, and I quote: Studies published on this website have not been peer reviewed. Side: Yes
1
point
|