Do you agree with the Kalaam Cosmological argument?
Yes.
Side Score: 6
|
 |
No.
Side Score: 2
|
|
|
|
|
5
points
Yes. I see it simply as a philosophical claim that there must be a first chicken. But in order to be "the first chicken" one would have to be from a reality not defined by tense, before or after, but the one who put time in motion in the first place. I combine the Kalam argument with the Unmoved Mover argument in my thinking. Side: Yes.
1
point
I think everyone is theist and agnostic on some level, but if you have mostly one, you identify with that one. I think that atheists having nagging doubts that God isn't there and theists have nagging doubts as to whether he is there. I identify as having faith but have accepted that I could be wrong and am fine with it. But I have strong reason to feel correct. I even made a page that shows my general thinking process. https://www.facebook.com/ Side: No.
|
No arguments found. Add one!
|
