Do you need to have sexy legs to get a boyfriend?
Yes, of course!!!
Side Score: 14
|
 |
No, that is not right
Side Score: 17
|
|
|
|
|
1
point
I'm very picky when it comes to legs. Me too. But I have a leg and foot fetish, so I'm biased. Men can tell if they would have sex with a woman in less than a second (careful how you read that =p). True on some level; there are certainly encounters wherein attraction grows over time, though. Personality is a distant second to looks. On this, I disagree vociferously. As far as the question is concerned, this is definitely not true. The women we "fuck" and the women we marry (or date seriously) are more often than not different kinds of people. Physical requirements tend to pertain to women you smash, not the women you want to spend time with and in whom you want to invest your emotions (i.e. be a boyfriend to). It's the character and/or personality that generally keeps you attracted long enough to decide to be that woman's boyfriend or husband. Side: No, that is not right
I firmly believe that on the aggregate, men are simply looking for the most genetically gifted woman that will let him stick his dick in her. As far as the question is concerned, marriage is quite different than simply having a boyfriend. In any case, good looking persons tend to be more intelligent, earn more, are more popular and have less complexes. More specific to the question, woman with curvier thighs and hips have been shown to have more intelligence. I know these things don't necessitate a "good" personality, but I would assert that smarter, happier, wealthier persons tend to be more agreeable than stupid, miserable poor persons. Side: Yes, of course!!!
Yes, yes, yes. If I had sexy legs, I'd be able to get a boyfriend. I want a boyfriend, dammit! Give me a boyfriend with sexy legs, too. Did I forget to mention that I'm a gay fat vet. Or that I'm a man.... (note to "argument grader": do not give this review any points for the "pro" side...) Side: Yes, of course!!!
|
3
points
No exactly. A smokin' hot rack, sexy ass, and beautiful face would make up for it. Just kidding....(sort of) I great personality is always good for a woman to to have. But if she's isn't appealing to the man, then they're just friends. There are 3 things every man must take into consideration when judging or admiring a woman: Personality, Face, and Body. I judge (admire) them in this order: Face, Body, Personality. If they have a nice face, I move onto the body. If they have a good body, then I'll get to know them and their personality. If they've got a likable personality, then I'll consider asking them out. It may be a bit shallow, but hey, I've got high standards. But that's just me and how I take care of business. Bare in mind that not every guy is like this or is this superficial. Side: No, that is not right
0
points
4
points
that is horrible, you have to have a good personality first and foremost. Actually, the first thing a man notices when looking at a woman is her physical manifestation. It's not shallow; it's common sense. How can one gauge a personality with one's eyes? Therefore the first thing you should get right is your appearance. A beautiful woman will never have to look far to find an interested male. An ugly, fat one will naturally spend more time alone, no matter how lovely a person she may be. Side: Yes, of course!!!
It doesn't say about if you are beautiful or not, it says 'sexy legs'. You are argueing that you need to be beautiful to get a boy friend the arguement is about if you need sexy legs to have a boyfriend. You can be beautiful but not have sexy legs, you could have a stunning figure except for legs, and you will be able to have a boyfriend. Side: No, that is not right
0
points
-1
points
-1
points
Side: No, that is not right
1
point
-2
points
|
