CreateDebate


Debate Info

20
14
The CHILDREN, of course From my COLD dead hands
Debate Score:34
Arguments:30
Total Votes:35
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 The CHILDREN, of course (19)
 
 From my COLD dead hands (11)

Debate Creator

excon(17120) pic



Do you think the libs want your guns to CONTROL you, or SAVE childrens lives?

The CHILDREN, of course

Side Score: 20
VS.

From my COLD dead hands

Side Score: 14
2 points

If leftists cared about saving children's lives, they would be prolife. Be prolife, or be prohypocrite.

Side: The CHILDREN, of course
excon(17120) Disputed
1 point

If leftists cared about saving children's lives,

Hello FU:

That's nice... Care to address the debate??

excon

Side: From my COLD dead hands
Developing(493) Disputed
1 point

Excon, what new gun control laws do you want? Chicago has very strict gun laws, yet they have a tremendous gun violence problem.

Side: The CHILDREN, of course
1 point

Even the misguided Lib's want to save lives.

The lives of children and adults as well.

The big realization is that we need guns to protect ourselves.

America is a cesspit of murderous violence with blacks and other ethnic groups, INCLUDING WHITES, having turned our towns and cities into death trap-shit holes where the value of life has been reduced to virtually zero.

This bloody awful country of ''HOME OF HOMICIDES'' is the culmination of successive governments trying to make the impossible social construct of MULTICULTURALISM work when it has never worked and never will work.

Until we have a government with sufficient political courage to flush this romantic leftist notion of racial and cultural diversity down the sewers we will continue to live our lives on a knife edge and need guns to protect ourselves and families.

SUCH IS MODERN DAY AMERICA, THE ONLY FREE DEMOCRATIC NATION ON THE PLANET WHOSE CITIZENS NEED FIREARMS TO PROTECT THEMSELVES.

THIS IS THE ''AMERICA'' WHICH WE ''AMERICANS'' HAVE CARVED OUT FOR OURSELVES.

GOOD, EH.

Side: The CHILDREN, of course
1 point

This is a great article. I like this topic. This site has a lot of advantages. I found many interesting things on this site. It helps me in many ways. Thank you for re-posting this post.

fall guys

Side: The CHILDREN, of course

What does control even mean? I hear this word over and over and nobody actually explains what meaningful differences in my daily life occur by being "controlled".

Side: The CHILDREN, of course
excon(17120) Disputed
1 point

What does control even mean? I hear this word over and over and nobody actually explains what meaningful differences in my daily life occur by being "controlled".

Hello A:

I'm not sure either.. But, this is what I'm afraid of:

I might not be able to travel

I might not be able to spend my money where I want

I might have to work where I'm told

I might have to vote for whom I'm told

I might have to live where I'm told

I might have to worship like I'm told

I might not be able to read what I want

I might not be able to see the movies I want

Of course, it might not change at all.. But, if it's not going to change, why are people so worked up about it?

excon

Side: The CHILDREN, of course

Most Liberals are pro gun and vote Republican now. The Democratic Party has few Liberals left in it. Communism is the future.

Side: From my COLD dead hands
1 point

They were pro second amendment until they started waving the Communist flag a few years back. And Communism can't exist within an armed populace. Up until about 5 or 6 years ago a liberal pretty much looked like a modern day Republican. Up until very recently the Democrat position on the border was to protect it, on abortion was legal but rare, their position on speech was free speech even speech you hate, and on guns they were in favor of the 2nd Amendment. Today they are none of those things.

Side: From my COLD dead hands
1 point

Do you think the libs want your guns to CONTROL you, or SAVE childrens lives?

Let's use leftist logic here. Armed civilians have saved childrens' lives. You're not anti children are you? Well you must be. You're against a guy having a gun after he saved childrens' lives with a gun. You are anti children.

https://m.washingtontimes.com/multimedia/collection/good-guy-gun-stopped-bad-guy-gun/

Side: From my COLD dead hands
1 point

Technically I don't think they want either. If they really cared about "saving the kids," they'd look into the issue of gun related homicide enough to know that gun control wouldn't make any meaningful difference in the number of children murdered each year. Having said that, I don't think the average liberal actually thinks of gun control as a means to control other people. The government might think of it that way, but not your average self-identified "liberal".

The people who support gun control do so because they're easily manipulated by whatever message they hear an authority figure tell them is just and moral.

Side: From my COLD dead hands