CreateDebate


Debate Info

31
26
Burrito says yes Burrito gets easily confused
Debate Score:57
Arguments:59
Total Votes:66
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Burrito says yes (27)
 
 Burrito gets easily confused (23)

Debate Creator

PregnantChow(31) pic



Burrito says yes

Side Score: 31
VS.

Burrito gets easily confused

Side Score: 26

I am thankful, that he accepted my apology, but I don't think, communism, is a good idea, nor does it allow or support, freedom, of choice.

Side: Burrito says yes

It sure does. For example, you can choose between hunger or starvation; which suits your the mood?

Side: Burrito says yes
3 points

Does Communism/Socialism give you freedom of choice?

Hello P:

Nahhh... Does fascism? Nahhh. Is there a difference between tyranny from the right or the left? Nahhh.

excon

Side: Burrito gets easily confused
TruthLord(16) Disputed
1 point

Is there a difference between tyranny from the right or the left? Nahhh.

You right wingers are the ones who want to shoot people for being Socialists and Socialists are the ones who want to shoot you for being tyrants though. You admitted that you think it's ok to kill people for being "commies".

Side: Burrito says yes
excon(14055) Disputed
1 point

You admitted that you think it's ok to kill people for being "commies"

Hello:

I dunno how you got so much wrong, but let's start with this. I am NOT a right winger.. 2nd, when we were at WAR with the Communists, and I was in the military, I thought was a good thing to kill our enemy.. 3rd, I don't wanna kill commies today.. I wanna kill Nazis.

excon

Side: Burrito gets easily confused
BuitPlug(39) Disputed
0 points

You right wingers

Only one wing is censoring people on youtube and social media. You'll care in the future when you need to say something that contrasts Big Brother's orthodoxy, but cannot.

Side: Burrito gets easily confused
1 point

Nahhh... Does fascism? Nahhh. Is there a difference between tyranny from the right or the left? Nahhh.

There's a huge goddamned difference, because tyranny is only ever on the right. The further right you go, the closer to a hierarchy society becomes with one supreme leader. The entire basis of left wing theory is for the voting majority to wrest the power in society out of the hands of the few or the one. People like Stalin, Hitler and Mao did not put left wing theory into practice, but rather used left wing theory to appeal to the masses while they simultaneously worked to consolidate their own power. Most scholars will tell you outright that Communism has never been tried, because the system has always been usurped by either internal opportunists from within or external paranoia from outside.

When people say stuff and they have a vested interest in what you believe about it, then you should really learn to take that with a pinch of salt.

Side: Burrito says yes
SHADDOW1(43) Disputed
1 point

There's a huge goddamned difference, because tyranny is only ever on the right.

Mao, Stalin, Polpot, Castro, Xi Ping, and Kim Jong Un are all Communists.

Many tyrannies have been run by Islamic regimes which you claim have no wing to attempt to defend Islam.

Side: Burrito gets easily confused
SHADDOW1(43) Disputed
1 point

People like Stalin, Hitler and Mao did not put left wing theory into practice, but rather used left wing theory to appeal to the masses

This is actually a really good point. Leftists are highly likely to put a tyrant into power because he appeals to liberal ideas he never plans on implementing. Also known as the Democratic and Labour Parties.

Side: Burrito gets easily confused
SHADDOW1(43) Disputed
1 point

Most scholars will tell you outright that Communism has never been tried

This is a good reason to never trust a politician claiming to be far left. This shows that the people the left has followed for decades weren't ever what they really claimed to be. Moderates, Independents, and those on the right have been saying this for years. Regardless of how you try to label them, this also shows that the right didn't put Mao, Stalin, Castro or Polpot into power. The left did.

Your claim would mean that these guys were "far right", yet leftists, not Conservatives put them into power and believed them.

Side: Burrito gets easily confused
1 point

That is a lie. Both parties, are capable, of tyranny.............................................................................

Side: Burrito gets easily confused

Very well said. And George Orwell captured it perfectly in Animal Farm.

“No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?

Side: Burrito says yes
Chinaman(2915) Clarified
1 point

Dummy did the Chinese people wrest power from Mao ? Dummy how many people did Mao kill ?

Speak up you Communist !

Side: Burrito says yes
Chinaman(2915) Clarified
1 point

Bernie Bro has a problem trying to figure out that Bernie is a Communist.

All your dumb ass can do is try to spin it so your OBC makes sense to you.

Side: Burrito says yes
2 points

I don't know about Burrito getting confused but, last night showed that Burrito eaters (which includes most of U.S. ;-), but especially the Hispanic and black communities, showed that they are more interested in freedom, than they are in "free stuff" like the right has tried to paint them! WAY TO GO!

Freedom alone gives U.S. freedom of choice! It has nothing to do with socialism or, especially communism! Capitalism wont take it away either, but it WILL increase the cost of it, and make less of it available for those who would like their fair share! (Enter a "BIT" of socialism. Enough to limit the upward drain of national treasure to those who want it ALL! ;-)

Side: Burrito gets easily confused
PregnantChow(31) Disputed
1 point

but especially the Hispanic and black communities, showed that they are more interested in freedom, than they are in "free stuff" like the right has tried to paint them!

Bernie literally got half of the votes in the primaries against Hillary Clinton.

Side: Burrito says yes
AlofRI(2974) Clarified
1 point

Yes. There again, people showed they valued freedom over free stuff. Then they turned around and voted for Hillary by three Million MORE, than they did for Trump …. who promised them everything! Better, cheaper health care and drugs, citizenship for Dreamers, protection for gays, lower tax rates for the middle class and a burden on the rich (HAHAHA), an end to "forever wars" … he failed to mention turning the world over to Putin and his ilk!

Funny thing. The "free stuff" he gave to the rich was used against him by a couple of them! What two billionaires spent was probably LESS than Trump "gave them" with his "middle class tax cut"!

Call that "poetic justice"! ;-)

Side: Burrito says yes
Chinaman(2915) Clarified
1 point

The Socialist comes along but it has a problem explaining how much that free stuff will cost.

Side: Burrito says yes
Chinaman(2915) Clarified
1 point

How did Mike Bloomberg amass a wealth of 60 billion dollars ? Stumble through an answer you fool.

Side: Burrito says yes