No, because different races have different hereditary advantages that others do not and that effects other things. Somewhat like the gender argument that women and men have different advantages that the other doesn't.

No, being completely equal would require exact DNA replicas, perfect regeneration of every feature a being owns, and the exact same brain patterns and thoughts.

Not all men are created equal. Men are created better than some, and worse than others more. There are men to whom everything comes easily, and some who will struggle throughout life. Human life is not some sort of race or game in which each person should start from an identical mark; it is an attempt by each man to be as happy as possible.

As in, in generally equal over groups of people, and not the oxymoron "general equality" which if generalized you'd need to assume there was inherent some inequality - or it would not need to be generalized. :p

Or whatever I'm trying to say.

Of course not.

Genetically for instance men and women have been bread for hundreds of thousands of years to meet different roles. Women are chosen for nurturing aspects from how they communicate to physical attributes better for child bearing, men for nearly the opposite, strength, confidence, killing things. Denying the differences doesn't bring humans closer to equality, it just ignores the inherent difference actually creating less equality.

That said however, no human based simply on any physical attribute is necessarily more or less capable of anything to a reasonable point (reasonable as in it is unreasonable for a man to bear children).

The way to improve equality is to recognize inequalities and to take steps to correct where possible, and to determine where correcting inequalities is ineffective and taking other steps to account, on both sides for this. Sticking to the men and women example, I don't want a bunch of mean bitches who can bench press as much as me and don't give a shit if I'm bleeding... er, unless it's some S&M;thing :p

On the same point, women don't really want guys who cry themself to sleep and chatter about their feelings all day long (no, they really don't, I know Cosmo and Operah say otherwise but they're wrong).

So basically, equal should not mean "the same" -- just equal as in opportunity, chance for a happy life, etc.

Not at all. Most people put money before life. Some even have the nerve to kill just to obtain luxuries. If general equality was present then third world countries would have no problem being helped, but most people see it as such an inconvenience to help or donate any more to people in need. If it did exist then everyone would be able to have the opportunity to success but in most countries people cannot even grasp an opportunity because death and pestilence surrounds them and eventually suffocates them. It's a sad thing but that's how our world is. Absolute equality is virtually impossible.