CreateDebate


Debate Info

15
17
Yes No
Debate Score:32
Arguments:33
Total Votes:41
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes (15)
 
 No (14)

Debate Creator

DrawFour(2662) pic



Does a God have to rule?

I'm not asking if their is or isn't a God, or if that if there is one, that we have to follow him. I'm simply asking if does the concept of being God, come with the clause of having to be a ruler.

Choose a side, and please explain why.

Yes

Side Score: 15
VS.

No

Side Score: 17
1 point

Yes, if the world leaders did follow God (not a crazy nazi aztec god), Hilter would not have done what he had, wars would not have happended. God is peaceful and loving(not the crazy one i just meantioned). I'm not saying we would wait for a reply from God, but if world leaders did what God might do in a situation, (pretty much doing what would be the best for the majority of the citizens) we would have a good, peaceful time.

Although the title of the debate might be a little confusing with the word "have" . Have might mean must, which i mostly consider it does mean "must". What does "must" mean exactly, anyways? Like its not possible that a "must" cannot be done? In that case, it is deafinitly not a must that God has to rule, but it would be benificial.

Side: Yes
Cuaroc(8829) Disputed
1 point

Ah yes flooding the entire world is so peaceful. Oh and Hitler did follow the Christian god.

Side: No
Inductive(22) Disputed
1 point

I'm quite the third Reich was extremely pagan. This sentence is to get over the 50 character limit, if you read this rub your face on the screen.

Side: Yes
Thejackster(518) Disputed
0 points

1. Most world leaders technically do follow God, it depends on which one your talking about. Aside from a few countries, most modern day world leaders identify as to being religious. Here in the United States, almost all of our presidents have identified as christian.

2. Hitler did not do what he did simply because he, in your words, "rejected God" . While I will concede that Hitler was most likely not a Christian (due to personal recorded statements), he never renounced his belief in a higher power and a great deal of the Germans and other Europeans who helped carry out the Holocaust were Christian. Plus, Hitlers anti-semitism (as well as anti-semitism in the West as a whole) has its roots in Christianity. Back during mideviel Europe, numerous pogroms were comitted against jews.

3. Most of the countries who score the highest when it comes to living conditions have largely non-religious populations, such as Sweden and the Czech Republic

Side: No
Elvira(3446) Disputed
0 points

Yes, if the world leaders did follow God

See Cathar genocide.

Side: No
Inductive(22) Disputed
1 point

An excuse for war. Something to persuade the citizens so they would help fight the war.

Side: Yes
1 point

I don't think world leaders even care about religion. It's their excuse for war. So when you say most of them do follow a god, they don't actually follow it. They use it to their advantage.

Side: Yes
1 point

Of course God has to rule. Image what the world would be like if God didn't rule. And image what the world would be like if we let Jesus be the center of our lives. Just image how the world would be like if everyone let Jesus be the center of their lives. Life would be so peaceful and joyful.

Side: Yes
1 point

No, I think he'd be more like a cruise director. ... organizing activities and making sure everyone is having a good time.

Side: No
Inductive(22) Disputed
1 point

Why won't we want to have a good time? In real life, a bad time wouldn't just be getting a cut or something, it would be having millions get acid poured on their faces and being buried alive.

Side: Yes
Cartman(18192) Disputed
1 point

What are you even talking about? He said God would give us a good time. Why would you draw the conclusion that a bad time would happen?

Side: No
Inductive(22) Disputed
1 point

And what's wrong with a cruise director?

The minimum argument length is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of debate and discourse as high as possible.

Side: Yes
Hellno(17753) Disputed
1 point

I never said anything was wrong with a cruise director.. what are you talking about? That's not how this works, it's not how any of this works

Side: No

I wish I could have given you more up votes for that. ;)

Side: No
Inductive(22) Disputed
1 point

This does not help any side of the debate. Why didn't you do clarify? You can't just get free points like that -.-

Side: Yes

Well that all depends really on your definition of God. But my answer would be no. If the defining factor of God is "something that created everything," the concept of God doesn't even have to be a personal god or even a conscious one. This "god" could be something along the lines of Aristotle's "Unmoved Mover". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unmoved_mover If we're using the term "God" under the assumption that it has the three main characteristics of those commonly held in theistic beliefs (omnipotency, omnisciency and infinity) then my answer would still be no, it could be God like the one believed by Deists.

Side: No
Inductive(22) Clarified
1 point

I agree, a lot of debates here need a clearer definition of the title.

Side: Yes
0 points

Since there is a lack of evidence for one, it seems we are doing just fine.

Side: No
Inductive(22) Disputed
1 point

The topic does not include if God exists or not. Can't you read?

Side: Yes
Inductive(22) Disputed
1 point

Yeah right... We're going just fine. YOU'RE doing just fine. Haven't you ever thought of the others? Like the current Ebola outbreak? Maybe the terrorists in the middle east?

Side: Yes
Cuaroc(8829) Disputed
1 point

Well your so called god hasn't done a single thing to stop either of those.

Side: No