CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
I honestly just wish you would fucking die, I hate you and wish nothing but death and suffering and humiliation on you which is how you feel about Africans.
English is probably your second language, but "a given" is a known and established fact. That I will die IS, that you wish me to is NOT. Neither is your swearing...
Please practice your debating here at createdebate.org on others for a while, and then please show me what you have learned. Remember to separate fluff from content, and only use emotions as a tool, not an outlet. Also it might be a good idea to refrain from participating certain dates of the month. Observing others is OK though :)
The easiest and most satisfying victories is when the opponent self-destructs.
A little trap here and a little trap there, and KABOOM, the debate is won by the other side's use of profanities or abandonment of the issue in favor of personal attacks.
In some cases both, and as here even topped of with criminal accusations - sweet!
Game over and thank you for making my day.
Too bad for africa though , as the result of all this is an end to all aid
The easiest and most satisfying victories is when your opponent makes you self-destruct , congrats you schooled me
I can offer you coaching if you wish
You set a little trap here and a little trap there, and KABOOM, the debate is won easily by you , my use of profanities or abandoning of the issue in favor of personally attacking you was wrong
I hoped you learned your lessons from a superior , from this comes growth
In some cases both, and as here I even topped of my abuses with criminal accusations
Yes pretty childish from you son
Game over and thank you for making my day.
You’re welcome and thanks for playing I must say you’ve taken your whipping pretty well
Too bad for africa though , as the result of all this is an end to all aid
Too bad for africa though , as the result of all this is an end to all aid
What Africa needs is an end to exploitation from capitalist corporations, not aid. The aid is provided as a smokescreen to misdirect do-gooders from the truth.
Let me ask you a hypothetical question diebastard: If the aid in question is made up of tin foods, and the wanna-be benevolent donor makes this a one-time deal of say, i don't know, 12 million cans of food, dumping it in three separate locations each contain one 4 million cans.
What would happen? What could happen? Are we guaranteed that the result will do more good than harm?
What if they started a war over the cans killing 4 Africans per 100 cans of food. Or say, the food was distributed fairly leading to three years of non-ending food and a steep rise in childbirths - leaving the Africans at the end of year 3 with a 27 % population increase and a dulled set of hunting skills. Now, are they better of? Or have the dependence on the can towers pushed them to a situation where they very well may loose a lot more than the babies that were born during the days of no effort? Asking the question is not racist - the world is, and perhaps even you diebastard (if that is even your real name...)
So this is your super intellectual business eh "genius" ? You sit on your computer trying to think of ways to make your apathy and hatred towards black people sound benevolent. I fucking hate worthless retards who go around declaring themselves genius when the way they think is directly opposite to all true geniuses who tend to be socialists and not racist little butt plugs.
I agree, diebastard. Is it a dutch name by the way? In ancient time, before both you and I was born. The dutch slave-trade was then a profitable business, but you shouldn't be held accountable for that. In the same way, Lebensraum, want what is best for Africa. But blitz-bombing the continent with tin cans is not the way forward. We agree on that. Someone could come in harm's way. Also, the high altitude could make the cans get lost if they land in quicksand or in a lake or something. Then it's all for nothing.
Also, can openers are not readily available everywhere. It would be only the richest who could open the cans and that would be a possible source of division and hatred. I think it is better to leave people alone. God will always find a way. I shall pray for Lebensraum and I am sure he will be ok.
Thank you YesIhave. There is no need for prayer, but your intentions seem good.
Love that you see the can opener issue: I myself see an upper class tribe grabbing power and control, dooming all chances of success. I guess that's the price of playing the game, huh?
Maybe it would be possible to send can openers first. That way would be helpful for opening cans and perhaps be useful for other things as well. It could be can openers with Jesus on them. It could be a way to share some of Jesus' love to the continent. But I am still worried about the high altitude. Also Co2 emissions is a concern, but I presume it wouldn't affect us in West-Virginia too much.
We are quite far away and shouldn't become to polluted by the poison. 12 million cans is a lot of cans. Are you talking small or big cans. They will weight more if they are big, for sure.
My business is the posing of hypotheticals in a debate? I know it's not nice to point out the weaknesses of my inferiors, but it might be the first step on YOUR journey to becoming a better debater. Of course, it might also break you, but if that is the case it would probably happen at your next defeat anyway, so no biggie.
My opinions on the africans are anything but apathetic - my friends and those who have discussed this issue with me would probably say I am quite the extremist (but in a very enlightening and eye-opening way).
People like you (I love that phrase) who block debate by claiming the moral ground are the ones that do the most harm to those less fortunate. You should leave this site in shame, and not come back until you are a better person. Good luck to you (I believe hate should be confronted with love)
So this is your super intellectual business eh "genius" ?
Incorrect , it’s a debate topic I offered you a demonstration of my genius via a challenge as in a game of chess you declined out of cowardice
You sit on your computer trying to think of ways to make your apathy and hatred towards black people sound benevolent.
The debate topic I posted gives no opinion on the matter but your ability to place the race card every-time it suits your narrow minded world views is telling
I fucking hate worthless retards who go around declaring themselves genius when the way they think is directly opposite to all true geniuses who tend to be socialists and not racist little butt plugs.
It’s typifies the sort of closed minded dolt you are that simple hard facts and truth every-time reduce you to a gibbering wreck such is your aversion to the truth
I offered you a demonstration of my genius via a challenge as in a game of chess you declined out of cowardice
Jody, your referral to yourself as a "genius" only goes to illustrate the mental health problems you suffer from. It would seem you think only a "genius" is capable of playing chess over the internet, when in actual fact anyone can freely download a world class chess engine and easily beat Magnus Carlson or Gary Kasparov.
Geniuses don't provide themselves with "tests" which any man can cheat in. That's what idiots do.
Do you have a chess.com account Nom? Maybe we can play some time. I am not a master though, I guarantee I would beat Jody but I have seen you talking about your chess skills before and you can probably beat me.
I do but it's been so long I don't even remember it. I quit because the number of cheaters is huge. The only way you can be sure your opponent isn't cheating is to play bullet chess, and I suck at that. Bullet chess is more about memory than logic.
Still, I probably managed about a 50/50 ratio on there even with the cheaters. I still have the odd chess phase now and then but to be honest I pretty much gave up when I realised I'd never be as good as I'd like to be. Usually I just play computers now, which is annoying because they are brutal, but at least they don't cheat.
Yeah, I will get it. I only just learned how to download apps a couple of hours ago. Thing has been pissing me off because I'm really a complete beginner at navigating everything. I was going bananas earlier because I had to sync up my laptop with my phone just to drag and drop music. The new features are great and everything but I'm really not sure they are worth the trade off in privacy. People are queuing up to give away their personal data these days.
Yeah I am more used to PC myself so phones can be annoying to navigate for me as well. Also typing on a phone is much worse than with a keyboard because it's slow and fucks up your grammar.
When it comes to privacy, the infringements are essentially built into everything now. It's practically impossible to avoid it. I even know from experience that there are algorithms which analyse what you type in forums and chat rooms because I called someone a "bonobo" once and the next page I opened had an ad for a clothing line called Bonobos.
Yeah I am more used to PC myself so phones can be annoying to navigate for me as well. Also typing on a phone is much worse than with a keyboard because it's slow and fucks up your grammar.
Yeah, I noticed that already. I had to import all my old contacts manually because they weren't saved to the SIM. What a nightmare that was.
When it comes to privacy, the infringements are essentially built into everything now. It's practically impossible to avoid it. I even know from experience that there are algorithms which analyse what you type in forums and chat rooms because I called someone a "bonobo" once and the next page I opened had an ad for a clothing line called Bonobos.
Lol. Yeah, absolutely. Even the ads here are targeted. I see stuff based on what I've searched for in Google.
Who "steals arguments" again? That would be you, when you can't devise a properly formulated manifestation of the brain cells (given how few of those you posses) you simply copy and paste the opponents argument and edit it to suit your own retarded butt hole.
Yet you use 6 different alt accounts to post up your bile because you cannot address any debate topic without flying into a rage simply because you cannot even formulate a defense such is your stupidity.......
You said you play chess I bet after 8 moves against the weakest opponents the board is turned over and you fly into a tantrum at yet another defeat .......
Correct on the second part , the first part you’ve never actually achieved so far on any debate topic
thank you very much.
A pleasure I’m sure
My win rate is very inconsistent. Sometimes I ass-pull wins against opponents that should be better and other times I make stupid mistakes.
As my initial assessment of your chess “ prowess “ anticipated as in your intermediate level at best and unlikely to improve on that it seems as your self evaluation would verify
I am very good at formulating arguments, I am better than you at chess and will become better at chess. Also anything else you say is the opposite of true.
🤣🤣🤣 You mean like the spirited argument you put up here regarding African aid🤣🤣🤣🤣
I am better than you at chess and will become better at chess. Also anything else you say is the opposite of true.
You’re not active imagination aside and you won’t become better your type live lives of isolated desperation which is why you have 100’s of accounts trying to for once say something intelligent even at this you’re an abject failure
Everything I say is copy and pasted by you in an attempt to better yourself
It's the age old moral dilemma. do you give such childlike people a fish or a fishing rod?
The problem here is that they'd probably eat the fishing rod, or try to adapt it as weapon with which to engage in tribal warfare.
Of course it is only but right and fitting that nations which suffer occasional crop failure or experience other natural disasters are supported by the international community.
In the case of some African nations however such donations are a total waste of money and are in direct conflict with nature's laws of natural selection.
Keeping these sub-groups artificially alive is only extending their pain and agony, and as the rest of the world advances into the age of advanced technology, they are progressively looked upon as mindless freaks wandering helplessly in a daze through the deserts and infertile parts of Africa most of which is a fruitful and wealthy continent that could support 100s of millions of people if it was populated by intelligent, hard working, self supporting people.
Wonderful. Did you ever see a clan of hyenas help their lion neighbors should they be threatened by starvation? Or green frogs donate insects to their blue brothers on their home lake full of green water lilies?
No, it's too bad maybe but we didn't get here be helping the weakest among us, it is not how the world works. We need to keep your eye on the price until we are spread among the stars. Then - if there are more blue frogs or primitive tribes on the brink of extinction - I am all for lending a hand (if it seems right at the time)