CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:49
Arguments:36
Total Votes:66
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Does aid to Africa do more harm than good? (35)

Debate Creator

Jody(1746) pic



Does aid to Africa do more harm than good?

Add New Argument
0 points

I honestly just wish you would fucking die, I hate you and wish nothing but death and suffering and humiliation on you which is how you feel about Africans.

Jody(1746) Disputed
1 point

I honestly just wish you would fucking die,

That’s a given eventually

I hate you and wish nothing but death and suffering and humiliation on you

That like the above is a given , you claim to hate everyone when the person you truly hate is yourself with excellent reasons to do so

which is how you feel about Africans.

Thank you for telling me how I feel according to you yet another of your useless observation based on the fevered machinations of your diseased brain

Lebensraum(28) Disputed
1 point

Jody, my emotional, female can-do-debater.

English is probably your second language, but "a given" is a known and established fact. That I will die IS, that you wish me to is NOT. Neither is your swearing...

Please practice your debating here at createdebate.org on others for a while, and then please show me what you have learned. Remember to separate fluff from content, and only use emotions as a tool, not an outlet. Also it might be a good idea to refrain from participating certain dates of the month. Observing others is OK though :)

Cocopops(347) Clarified
-2 points
Lebensraum(28) Disputed
1 point

Let me ask you a hypothetical question diebastard: If the aid in question is made up of tin foods, and the wanna-be benevolent donor makes this a one-time deal of say, i don't know, 12 million cans of food, dumping it in three separate locations each contain one 4 million cans.

What would happen? What could happen? Are we guaranteed that the result will do more good than harm?

What if they started a war over the cans killing 4 Africans per 100 cans of food. Or say, the food was distributed fairly leading to three years of non-ending food and a steep rise in childbirths - leaving the Africans at the end of year 3 with a 27 % population increase and a dulled set of hunting skills. Now, are they better of? Or have the dependence on the can towers pushed them to a situation where they very well may loose a lot more than the babies that were born during the days of no effort? Asking the question is not racist - the world is, and perhaps even you diebastard (if that is even your real name...)

-1 points

So this is your super intellectual business eh "genius" ? You sit on your computer trying to think of ways to make your apathy and hatred towards black people sound benevolent. I fucking hate worthless retards who go around declaring themselves genius when the way they think is directly opposite to all true geniuses who tend to be socialists and not racist little butt plugs.

YesIhave(23) Disputed
1 point

I agree, diebastard. Is it a dutch name by the way? In ancient time, before both you and I was born. The dutch slave-trade was then a profitable business, but you shouldn't be held accountable for that. In the same way, Lebensraum, want what is best for Africa. But blitz-bombing the continent with tin cans is not the way forward. We agree on that. Someone could come in harm's way. Also, the high altitude could make the cans get lost if they land in quicksand or in a lake or something. Then it's all for nothing.

Also, can openers are not readily available everywhere. It would be only the richest who could open the cans and that would be a possible source of division and hatred. I think it is better to leave people alone. God will always find a way. I shall pray for Lebensraum and I am sure he will be ok.

1 point

Thank you YesIhave. There is no need for prayer, but your intentions seem good.

Love that you see the can opener issue: I myself see an upper class tribe grabbing power and control, dooming all chances of success. I guess that's the price of playing the game, huh?

Lebensraum(28) Disputed
1 point

My business is the posing of hypotheticals in a debate? I know it's not nice to point out the weaknesses of my inferiors, but it might be the first step on YOUR journey to becoming a better debater. Of course, it might also break you, but if that is the case it would probably happen at your next defeat anyway, so no biggie.

My opinions on the africans are anything but apathetic - my friends and those who have discussed this issue with me would probably say I am quite the extremist (but in a very enlightening and eye-opening way).

People like you (I love that phrase) who block debate by claiming the moral ground are the ones that do the most harm to those less fortunate. You should leave this site in shame, and not come back until you are a better person. Good luck to you (I believe hate should be confronted with love)

Jody(1746) Disputed
0 points

So this is your super intellectual business eh "genius" ?

Incorrect , it’s a debate topic I offered you a demonstration of my genius via a challenge as in a game of chess you declined out of cowardice

You sit on your computer trying to think of ways to make your apathy and hatred towards black people sound benevolent.

The debate topic I posted gives no opinion on the matter but your ability to place the race card every-time it suits your narrow minded world views is telling

I fucking hate worthless retards who go around declaring themselves genius when the way they think is directly opposite to all true geniuses who tend to be socialists and not racist little butt plugs.

It’s typifies the sort of closed minded dolt you are that simple hard facts and truth every-time reduce you to a gibbering wreck such is your aversion to the truth

Bootstrap(226) Disputed
1 point

I offered you a demonstration of my genius via a challenge as in a game of chess you declined out of cowardice

Jody, your referral to yourself as a "genius" only goes to illustrate the mental health problems you suffer from. It would seem you think only a "genius" is capable of playing chess over the internet, when in actual fact anyone can freely download a world class chess engine and easily beat Magnus Carlson or Gary Kasparov.

Geniuses don't provide themselves with "tests" which any man can cheat in. That's what idiots do.

-1 points

It's the age old moral dilemma. do you give such childlike people a fish or a fishing rod?

The problem here is that they'd probably eat the fishing rod, or try to adapt it as weapon with which to engage in tribal warfare.

Of course it is only but right and fitting that nations which suffer occasional crop failure or experience other natural disasters are supported by the international community.

In the case of some African nations however such donations are a total waste of money and are in direct conflict with nature's laws of natural selection.

Keeping these sub-groups artificially alive is only extending their pain and agony, and as the rest of the world advances into the age of advanced technology, they are progressively looked upon as mindless freaks wandering helplessly in a daze through the deserts and infertile parts of Africa most of which is a fruitful and wealthy continent that could support 100s of millions of people if it was populated by intelligent, hard working, self supporting people.

1 point

Wonderful. Did you ever see a clan of hyenas help their lion neighbors should they be threatened by starvation? Or green frogs donate insects to their blue brothers on their home lake full of green water lilies?

No, it's too bad maybe but we didn't get here be helping the weakest among us, it is not how the world works. We need to keep your eye on the price until we are spread among the stars. Then - if there are more blue frogs or primitive tribes on the brink of extinction - I am all for lending a hand (if it seems right at the time)