CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:68
Arguments:59
Total Votes:71
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 EPA issues 50-state climate warning (59)

Debate Creator

DBCooper(2194) pic



EPA issues 50-state climate warning

The madness of the Progressives continues with Global Chaos. Now the EPA takes part in that madness.

The Environmental Protection Agency Thursday (10-6-16) unveiled its new online tool to help local officials deal with climate change, and it warns that no state in the nation is safe from disaster. The "Climate Change Adaptation Resource Center," or "ARC-X,"provides a map that break the country into eight regions and every single one comes with a threatening warning and long list of threats to human life."From floods and droughts to dangerous heat islands and other public health effects, communities are facing the very real impacts of climate change," said EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy in unveiling the portal.

Progressives are out of their mind. Driven crazy by their insanity. 

This nothing more than about more taxation on the American people and businesses in America. 

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/epa-issues-50-state-climate-warning-flood-drought-insect-outbreaks/article/2603806#! 

Add New Argument

Well, on this issue I'm inclined to come out in favour of climate change.

The big problem is that as there has been no sudden climateic trauma people tend to either dismiss the warnings as standard political rhetoric or go into denial as they have more pressing concerns such as putting bread on the table and finding the dosh to pay the electricity bill.

There is little, if any doubt that decades of belching Co2 gases into the atmosphere by the world's industrial nations has caused a catastrophic effect on the behaviour of world weather.

Due to the unpredictability of how these changes will manifest themselves the predictions by the meteorological boffins have been proven wrong so often that their forecasts are viewed with extreme skepticism.

However, this is not to say that climatic change is not occurring, it is, and the proof can be seen and recorded from Ireland to New Zealand.

The other problem is that the weather change phenomenon is denied by some experts and that in turn strengthens the opinion that the warnings are nothing more than hot air, no pun intended

As we are so far losing the battle the with climate change and international terrorism I worry about the future my children and grandchildren will have to endure.

3 points

I have been fishing for 20 plus years and you know i have never seen a dangerous heat island. Any drought that has come along i have always been able to launch my boat.

1 point

i have never seen a dangerous heat island

You apparently don't know what one is.

i have always been able to launch my boat.

Then sea-level rise must not be happening - wait, what?

Do you think everyone who used to fish on Lake Chad can still launch their boat?

2 points

"From floods and droughts to dangerous heat islands and other public health effects, communities are facing the very real impacts of climate change"

The scare tactics the Progressives use is shown in their insanity. No way can government predict the fears that they push on their stupid minion voters.

Can any of you Progressives explain what a "Dangerous Heat Island" is ?

1 point

I think we are going to be getting harsher storms for sure, and there is going to be some changes that we are going to have to adapt to and quickly.

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-09-29/atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-levels-pass-400-ppm-tipping-point-maybe-for-good

I'd be curious to see what people thought of that.

DBCooper(2194) Disputed
1 point

CO2 levels pass 400 ppm ? Is that bad ? If CO2 levels were to high then why aren't the trees dying. Trees take in CO2 and release oxygen.

1 point

Who said CO2 at 400 ppm kills trees? oh right, nobody.

If you can't attack facts - a strawman comes in handy.

1 point

You know what, i agree with you, and I say that despite believing that climate change is real and manmade. The way I see it there is a tremendous variation in the geography of all 50 states and for a warning like this to basically say all 50 are in trouble is suspicious. Are Hawaii and Alaska as vulnerable to climate change as Louisiana and Florida? Probably not, but you wouldn't know that from that sort of nation-wide warning.

1 point

I"m with the Government because he wants to help stop the air pollution because he knows its bad to breath in and don"t want his people breath in bad air. and it can effect there natural recourse's like food,and fresh water.