CreateDebate


Debate Info

47
74
yes no
Debate Score:121
Arguments:109
Total Votes:121
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 yes (40)
 
 no (52)

Debate Creator

bloisy2013(66) pic



England are better than america at everything

england dont get any credit for anything its always america that get it and we get walked straight over and the americans are douchbags to thier citenzens because if u go in hospital for a couple of weeks youve got a bill of like 200,000 dollers to pay which can ruin lives, and to be honest Football is better than NfL only slightly tho.

yes

Side Score: 47
VS.

no

Side Score: 74

England is the best at losing most of the land they gained in almost 500 years in a little over 50 years.

Side: yes
Axmeister(4317) Disputed
1 point

At least we can win wars by ourselves.

Side: no
1 point

Because the British Empire totally won both world wars all by themselves. I'd say conquering 1/4th of the world and creatign the most powerful military over 500 years and then being reduced to a nation the size of Michigan with a few islands that are essentially just resorts for fat tourists counts as losing something...

Side: no
1 point

Biggest Empire.

Side: yes

Americans are British. They just don't realize it. They think the same, they fuck the same. A lot of fucking shit in common. They're just not as good at being British as the British are. There are niggers and Jews in both countries, so both will ultimately fail. Fuck 'em. There's always Canada.

Side: yes
14 points

Well, not at grammar it seems.....

Side: no
2 points

Here, here old chap.

Side: no
TheAshman(2299) Clarified
2 points

Please don't take Bloise's attitude, spelling and grammar to be typical of the British, he stands for everything that is bad in the UK at the moment, luckily his brand of racism and poor grasp of the language is in the minority and will hopefully stay they that way. Thinking all British people are like him would be like thinking all Americans have the same views as the KKK.

Side: yes
Jungelson(3931) Clarified
1 point

I know, I just found it hugely ironic how he is saying the British are " betterer" than the Americans, it sort of defeats the point.

And by the way, I am British and would rather live in Britain than America, I just had to say I am not a biased imbecile who will 'love my country, warts and all', the man was clearly an imbecile, and I was making it clear I thought so!

And again, by the way, I don't really stand for any country, my passport may be British, but I'm not one for all the patriotism..!

Side: yes
bloisy2013(66) Disputed
1 point

im actually a female not a male and im not racist i actually have alot of friends that are differents races and coulours so dont suggest that im racist i said i support ukiep and edl but edl actually only protest against muslims i dont agree with the way they carry out there extremisem but i agree with some of there beliefs

Side: yes
2 points

Dammit! You beat me to it! :D

Side: no

Not everything.

Side: no

We have the best Call of Duty players in the world. Have you ever wondered why we dont have an olympic American Football team? It because our guys would terrorize and dominate.

Side: no

We have the best Call of Duty players in the world

I believe this may be true.

Side: no
lupusFati(790) Clarified
1 point

Seeing as how I lived with one of the best for about 4 months, I'd have to bet on America if it ever came down to a Call of Duty tournament... nay, a video game tournament in general. I'm not sure whether I should be proud of that or not, but my inner geek doesn't give a fuck.

Side: yes
1 point

That, that would be Japan, then Korea would get 2nd place.

Side: no
1 point

You sir obviously do not play Call of Duty. We are number one. We have the greatest players.

Side: yes
2 points

Bloisy go cry in a corner. The reason why we get credited for a lot of things is because the English have to take care of jealous morons like you.

Side: no
2 points

I'm sure America has some things it's best at around the world, just as Britain has it's own.

Side: no
2 points

Whilst I am biased towards england because i'm an Englishman debates like this are stupid and pointless, yes England is better than America at some things America is better than others and its pointless comparing the two unless you are comparing things they both do for instance the quality of healthcare maybe better in America but I think the British system which gives healthcare to all not just those that can afford it is the better system.

Side: no
1 point

Not necessarily. I like the NFL just fine thank you (even though Football is an incorrect term for it). A bill of $200,000 is like you getting cancer treatment for 10 years! Nobody charges that much for a visit. It is more expensive than other countries. But we have the best doctors, that's why people come to America to get surgery and treatment. America did kick Britain's butt twice, and saved them during WW2, so we've got that. We have a more powerful military. You guys do have Scotland, which is nice (but is going to end soon). We aren't all jerks. Depends on which state you go to, like Nebraska! Nebraska is awesome and has great people!

Side: no
Atrag(5538) Disputed
1 point

A bill of $200,000 is like you getting cancer treatment for 10 years! Nobody charges that much for a visit

Actually that figure would be for 20 days in a intensive care unit. You're sentiment is right though - only the extremely ill people can't afford the health care they need. The slightly ill that only need to get to their family doctor or something once a month will probably be able to afford it.

Side: yes
Doherty95(299) Disputed
1 point

America did kick Britain's butt twice

Course you did... wanna say when because I bet that isn't the case.

and saved them during WW2

America did not save the British. The USA did make contributed considerably to the war, but Russia and Britain did far more in the war. Also it would be unlikely that Germany would have invaded Britain considering we had the most powerful navy. We may not have gotten France back but I doubt Germany would have invaded Britain.

I don't agree with the question, but I don't think you were correct.

Side: yes
Scout143(651) Disputed
1 point

First in the Revolution, we did beat Britain in the battles, and the French gave us Naval support! Other than that we took loans from the Dutch and Spain. Then during the War of 1812. Scared the British navy, and slaughtered them on the Great Lakes and New Orleans.

I'm not saying they didn't bore the brunt of the war, they did, but I really do think that without support from the US, Britain would have succumbed to Germany. We gave them money, planes (and pilots), tanks, ships, and arms. Without that Britain would be speaking German. Britain may have had a more powerful navy, but you guys were spread thin across your empire, and the Germans would have concentrated it more locally. And even if the navy prevented a landing, Germany would have taken to the air and either bombed the navy or just airlifted the army over the channel.

Side: no
Elvira(3447) Disputed
1 point

saved them during WW2

~and which country masterminded the D-day landings?

Side: yes
Scout143(651) Disputed
1 point

Both did. Eisenhower with Montgomery and Morgan. It was a British plan, used with American experience in landings in the Pacific, Africa, and Italy. Duel credit is due.

Side: no
1 point

Dupe

Side: no
TheAshman(2299) Disputed
1 point

I only have a couple of things to disagree on the first is which two times did America kick Britain's butt, if your referring to the American Revolution you only managed that with the help of France and Spain, the revolution would have failed if it was America on their own against Britain. Secondly America may have a bigger military and bigger military spending but the training techniques are British and there has been at least one US marine that has said that you can keep Spetsnaz, Seals and all other countries Special Forces as he'd rather have a British squaddie having his back in a warzone because they just don't give up in his own words when the going gets tough a British squaddie just lights up his cigarette and says "come on you Wanker we've got a job to do"

Side: yes
Scout143(651) Disputed
1 point

The Revolution we won the land battles and France helped us out with her navy. Spain, didn't really do much in the way of support other than give us some money and a pat on the back.

The second time we did it during the War of 1812. We won a lot of ocean battles as well as battles on the Great Lakes, New Orleans, and "Old Ironsides". We got what we wanted from it and Britain lost a few thousand soldiers and sailors and their pride.

The training wasn't all British. Most armies worldwide (especially special forces) derive their training from American, British, Russian, German, and Israeli tactics. They combine all of them, it's an international deal.

Side: no
1 point

Dupe

Side: no
1 point

The Revolutionary War says differently. . .

Side: no
Doherty95(299) Disputed
1 point

Are you forgetting you had the french, spanish and dutch on your side in that war?

Side: yes
sauh(1107) Disputed
2 points

So America is better at making allies as well.

Side: no
lupusFati(790) Clarified
1 point

It's really not America's fault that they all chose to side against the British. Except I think the French were waiting to see who might come out on top before they lent their aid, to be fair.

I'm not a huge history buff, but for at least part of the war we were on our own, and we did quite well all things considered. But of course, you're probably using the British schoolbooks, which tend to be biased against the Revolutionary War.

Side: yes
1 point

I wouldn't neccarilly say this. The UK is a safer place to live in, but the USA is much more powerful; for example, GDP of the UK is 2 trillion, USA is 15 trillion.

Side: no
1 point

England is better at football (soccer).

America is better at American Football (obviously).

England is better at not having weapons.

America is better at using weaponry.

England sucks at invading countries these days (LOL).

America is the world police these days (LOL).

So no, actually. America would be "better" at some things than England, but I must say England is probably better at voter turnout rates, less crime over there I imagine, perhaps better education for the younger chaps, healthcare, who knows.

Side: no
1 point

There is no best country or worst country. Your nationality does not determine your content of character.

Side: no

WE TWERK BETTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111

Side: no
1 point

The correct spelling and grammer would be as follows: "England is better than America at everything." (Give or take a few grammar rules, but in this form it's at least tolerable).

And now for your next lesson. Repeat after me: The rain in Spain stays mainly on the plain.

Side: no
1 point

just to clarify my friend actually posted this debate i did not know also i dont agree with him anyway i think there both equally good just england has some good points and bad points vise versa.

Side: no