CreateDebate


Debate Info

15
4
Provides for the low income. The money is misused.
Debate Score:19
Arguments:18
Total Votes:20
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Provides for the low income. (14)
 
 The money is misused. (3)

Debate Creator

Brandimich(5) pic



Are foodstamps being misused?

The government gives people with low income thousands of dollars every month for food and that money is coming out of our paycheck. I work hard for my money and just to see people misuse the money is wrong. Currently i work at a grocery store part time and i notice a majority of the people who use the foodstamp card are always either buying candy , or soda. Most of the time the people have like three different types of cookies and cakes it's ridiculous. I also notice most of the time the women either have their nails done or hair and if not all the time i see them carrying name brand purses. So if they can afford all these materialisic things shoundn't they be able to buy their own grocerys? Do you think the government should lower the amount given to certain people? or should we even have foodstamps at all?

Provides for the low income.

Side Score: 15
VS.

The money is misused.

Side Score: 4
2 points

Like any government funded program.

It can/will be abused. This attack on poor people is getting ridiculous. No one wants to punish the rich. Look at Mitt Romney... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFNmaYlPPsQ. This cheap mother fucker will do anything to save money.

Side: Provides for the low income.
0 points

My apologies, I appear to have ruined your debate.. All for a good cause :)

Side: Provides for the low income.
Sitara(11080) Disputed
2 points

How immature of you. .

Side: The money is misused.

porn

Side: The money is misused.
Jungelson(3959) Disputed
1 point

Damn I thought you weren't going to listen...

Fuck Off.

Side: Provides for the low income.
Jungelson(3959) Disputed
1 point

Damn I thought you weren't going to listen...

Fuck Off.

Side: Provides for the low income.
Jungelson(3959) Disputed
1 point

Damn I thought you weren't going to listen...

Fuck Off.

Side: Provides for the low income.
Jungelson(3959) Disputed
1 point

Damn I thought you weren't going to listen...

Fuck Off.

Side: Provides for the low income.
Jungelson(3959) Disputed
1 point

Damn I thought you weren't going to listen...

Fuck Off.

Side: Provides for the low income.
Jungelson(3959) Disputed
1 point

Damn I thought you weren't going to listen...

Fuck Off.

Side: Provides for the low income.
Jungelson(3959) Disputed
1 point

Damn I thought you weren't going to listen...

Fuck Off.

Side: Provides for the low income.
Jungelson(3959) Disputed
1 point

Damn I thought you weren't going to listen...

Fuck Off.

Side: Provides for the low income.
Jungelson(3959) Disputed
1 point

Damn I thought you weren't going to listen...

Fuck Off.

Side: Provides for the low income.
Jungelson(3959) Disputed
1 point

Fuck Off.

Side: Provides for the low income.
Jungelson(3959) Disputed
1 point

Fuck Off.

Side: Provides for the low income.
Jungelson(3959) Disputed
1 point

Fuck Off.

Side: Provides for the low income.
Quocalimar(6470) Clarified
2 points

Spam a spammer. You're not helping at all.

Side: Provides for the low income.
1 point

I have to agree they are being misused but then again some people do need them.

Side: The money is misused.