I will narrow it down to three choices: If Russia isn't involved... I want to go to the middle of Siberia. If the US isn't involved,,, then northern Alberta, Canada. And if the US and Russia are going at each other... then Bora Bora in the south Pacific.

Right where the first one lands. You are going to be killed anyway (one way or another; radiation). I want to go out without suffering.

Can I say the Bermuda Triangle?

If not I'm getting a one-way ticket to the Space Station.

Dead. Because what would be the point of suffering aka living ?

Duh, as far away as possible.---------------------------------

in Australia.

we are the furthest from all known nuclear countries and their arsenals.

4 miles under ground in a bunker with plenty of food. Somewhere like Antarctica, that's almost devoid of human life. No reason to nuke Antarctica.

I would want to be in moon in a lead bunker, 10 mile under ground.

I would choose the very bottom of Baja Mexico. It gives you nearly a 1,000 mile buffer zone between you and the expected blast zones in the United States and its nuclear allies in the Western Hemisphere.

I would also have a bunker that has approximately two feet thick of ultra high dense concrete (The type that is used in bank vaults). That would be for gamma radiation.

At my home outside flat on my front lawn. I will feel O.K. there. I won't have to worry about the consequences from nuclear war.