God VS Science:
God
Side Score: 5
|
 |
Science
Side Score: 3
|
|
|
|
|
God vs science, lol obviously God will win. He has super powers, can see everything, super smart, and can even lift the biggest boulder ever ( or not if he wanted to), while science has limitations, and steps that need to be taken. Worst of all for science that God isn't disadvantaged by, is that science has to prove everything, and back up that proof with even more proof. God doesn't even have to think of that silliness, so he's not slowed down by it. I mean look at the feats! God built the universe and all of us, in a week! Science took millions of years. We'd have all died by then. Another feat: Science has built a bomb capable of taking out an entire country... yawn. God got pissed, and pissed on the whole world, flooding it for a month! In a straight fight, with prep time, and rage mode on, all my money is on God any day of the week. (Except Sunday.) I mean the only downside to God is that if the location is in 'reality' God probably won't show... so there's that. Side: God
Science demonstrate why boulder does and does not move; God revealed as sad excuse magician. Science prove its own existence, then shows God probably just intellectual wet-dream (maybe fairytale if science playing nice). Science demonstrate Earth not form in seven days; God revealed as liar (or real bad mathman, if science generous). Science took out whole Bible; God revealed as impotent liar. Science fights on Sunday; God cannot get the minions to work. Science speculate that even in fiction God not show because is hard show face when get owned so bad by Science. Side: God
1
point
0
points
|
God would win if he existed but there is no evidence to support God being real. However there is lots of proof to claim science is real, science itself is built on proof and evidence. The 7 days hypothesis where God created the world in that amount of time has been disproven. It's been proven it took tens of thousands for life to begin on Earth and its taken even more time for that single first living thing to evolve into every animal on this planet today. If you're talking about something that has no evidence behind it so is classed as a lie against something that lives of proof which is classed as the truth, it's common sense that the true and existent thing would win. Case closed. Side: Science
1
point
I have nothing against God, but science is the more dependable and reliable choice. If you notice over time, supernatural explanations are being replaced by scientific explanations as we understand the world more. Knowing this, supernatural beliefs aren't all that reliable. Also, there is no viable proof of God while science provides all the proof we need. Science helps explain things we have trouble comprehending and helps us improve the world around us. As an atheist, I believe in a higher force of nature in some form, but there is no God. Side: Science
|
