CreateDebate


Debate Info

10
12
Yes, it helps with security No, it is unhumane
Debate Score:22
Arguments:68
Total Votes:26
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes, it helps with security (10)
 
 No, it is unhumane (9)

Debate Creator

FUNMUN(127) pic



Guantanamo bay: Should we have it? or Should we close it?

For those of you who do not know, Guantanamo bay is located in cuba and it is a U.S. prison for being suspected or convicted for terrorism.  The inmates are brutally tortured and it is legal because they are not citizens of the United States and they are not on American soil.  Some topics what i would recommend you  include in your argument:  America's reputation, prisoners rights, effectiveness, and possible solutions if you want it close it.

Yes, it helps with security

Side Score: 10
VS.

No, it is unhumane

Side Score: 12
1 point

It could be a great vacation resort someday. There would be no better place to host international water boarding competitions.

Side: Yes, it helps with security

Brutally tortured, that's kinda redundant, but that aside; there is nothing we've done to them that would compare to what they would do to us.

Furthermore, from what I've seen, they are treated very well with 3 squares a day, halaly speaking; religious rituals allowed; medical care and all the other amenities many would envy. They are enemy combatants so, therefore, they are not entitled to constitutional rights like Americans are, at least that's my understanding.

I have no problem whatsoever with them being there ,and Gitmo being open, that is a good thing.

Side: Yes, it helps with security
BigOats(1449) Disputed
3 points

there is nothing we've done to them that would compare to what they would do to us. isn't that redundant logic? This feeds the circle of violence; what "they" will do to you could be a direct result of what you do to them.

They are enemy combatants so, therefore, they are not entitled to constitutional rights like Americans are, Did America ever declare war on Iraq? No? So then these people are NOT enemy combatants. From the international law perspective, they are being illegally detained. If you suspect them of complacency in terrorist acts, they deserve a fair trial. They cannot be detained indefinitely just because you want it so. This is a clear breach of international law.

Side: No, it is unhumane
0 points

I don't see why we don't just use a mini-nuke and blow them all up. They want to be martyrs for Allah, give them what they want.

Side: Yes, it helps with security
Eloy(190) Disputed
1 point

Which prisoners in Guantánamo concentration camp said they want to be murdered?

Side: No, it is unhumane
NowASaint(1380) Clarified
1 point

are you as dense as you sound ?

Side: Yes, it helps with security
2 points

Its not only inhumane, its also illegal. people in American territories are entitled to constitutional rights, just like in DC or Puerto Rico. Prisoners in Guantanamo Bay have had their rights suspended without due process of law.

Side: No, it is unhumane
NowASaint(1380) Clarified
0 points

Prisoners do not have limited constitutional rights, and prisoners of war have less rights.

The best thing to do with those murderers is to put them all out of their misery, a swift little nuke will do the trick so they don't have to see it coming and they don't have to suffer...even though they gloat over making us suffer, we can put them out of their misery suddenly so they don't feel the pain.

Side: Yes, it helps with security
1 point

So.... you're pro death penalty ?

Side: No, it is unhumane
1 point

People are incarcerated in Guantánamo concentration camp who have never been charged with a crime or found guilty in a court of law. It is un-American.

Side: No, it is unhumane
1 point

Information extracted under torture is unlikely to be accurate: people will tell you whatever you want to hear in order to stop the torture. Also, often the carrot is more effective in interrogation than the stick (Source 1). Further, when in a war situation, if we torture enemy combatants then our enemies will do the same to our captured soldiers.

To conclude, torture causes horrendous suffering and it's results appear better achieved though other means. In addition, some of these people may not even be guilty as they were never given a trial.

Sources:

(1) http://militaryhistorynow.com/2013/12/18/we-have-ways-of-making-you-talk-kindness-not-torture-yielded-more-for-intel-for-this-nazi-interrogator/

Side: No, it is unhumane
1 point

Information extracted under torture is unlikely to be accurate: people will tell you whatever you want to hear in order to stop the torture.

This is true and it is why confessions alone do not constitute evidence. The Birmingham Six, The Maguire Seven and the Guildford Four were all convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment on the strength of confessions and all of them were innocent. And they were genuine confessions. Don't even get me started on the fake "confession" of bin Laden being the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks.

Side: Yes, it helps with security
0 points

I don't see why we don't just use a mini-nuke and blow them all up. They want to be martyrs for Allah, give them what they want.

Side: No, it is unhumane