Harry Potter or Twilight and why?
Harry Potter
Side Score: 43
|
Twilight
Side Score: 10
|
|
|
|
4
points
Harry Potter did not base it's entire plot on overused teenage cliches. It was about a boy moving on past a childhood of misfortune and neglect as he slowly devopled into a man of his own with a new family and a greater understanding of what his parents were like.
Side: Harry Potter
4
points
2
points
I just don't like twilight, they fooled me in the 1st one into thinking it was about vampires when it's actually about love. I hear the latest movie has an epic fight scene and the emo girl is finally a vampire but I feel if i watched it i'd be missing so much from the 1st ones and I am still upset about the lies that were sold to me in the 1st one. So No Twilight For Me! Side: Harry Potter
Harry Potter all the way. Not only are the books written 5000x more better, but the message sent by the Harry Potter series is actually a good one about love and friendship... Not about having the worlds most obnoxious crush and sexual relations with a vampire. Ew. Side: Harry Potter
2
points
Edward can run fast and sparkle. Harry can just cast a spell to open a black hole and destroy everything. Harry also has more spells and tricks than Edward or Jacob or Bella......omg and Bella is like the first girl to have no emotion of pleasure. Not a smile. If she did I know the camera commited suicide by just exploding. Side: Harry Potter
I don't hate Twilight. It's not terrible. There are some cheesy, unrealistic aspects to it, but there are also some cute aspects. And, this wasn't written as a cliche, overexposed topic. No one really talked about it until Twilight came out. Twilight is what caused it to become a cliche. However, Harry Potter has a complex storyline. Twilight is basically a love story. Harry Potter is about a kid who's had a rough life finding his place. He goes on amazing adventures, makes amazing friends, and there are a few love stories. It keeps you on the edge of your seat, very emotionally invested. I don't have anything against Twilight, but I think Harry Potter has more to it. I also think the acting is better in Harry Potter. Everyone in Twilight is pretty emotionless. Side: Harry Potter
1
point
1
point
|
They aren't ' vampires ' Vampires die in the light. VAMPIRES : Dracula, Let me in, HELL, EVEN SCARY GODMOTHER was more accurate. Fascinating? If you like cilched romance, teen, and Valentino's fish taco themes. Interesting? These are interesting. - Warrior Cats - Harry Potter - Halloween - Happy Tree Friends - Pudding - Airman - Profiles of the Presidents Hell, even a WORM is more interesting than Twilight....... Harry potter : ORIGINAL EPIC REAL WEREWOLVES WELL-WRITTEN NOT A FAIL TEEN STORY..... NOT FISH TACOS..... Etc. Side: Harry Potter
-1
points
Twilight. Honestly, there is not much to debate about. Unless you are a hardcore fangirl/fanboy. Which I am not. However, I much prefer twilight. I have never gotten into Harry Potter. The first movie was good, but after that I feel that they slowly declined. The story was worn out, didn't keep my interest. But I also know that many could say the same exact thing for Twilight. It has more to do with your taste in movies than actual facts. Twilight is simply just more of my kind of movie. It involves the modern day representation of vampires, and it is a love story. What is there not to love? Especially if you are a girl. However, I fully respect those who favor Harry Potter. Its just a matter of the difference in personal preferences. Side: Twilight
1
point
-1
points
2
points
|