Is all banning equally justifiable? From what I understand, many have grievances with you banning them for simply disagreeing with you. I'm not familiar with which debate "Hellno" apparently banned you from, but, if you were acting in a similar manner then as you are now, I can guess at why that would be the case.

You, as you constantly bemoan of others, have done little but insult me throughout the entirety of our "discussion". In fact, it seems you've gone out of your way to insult me at least once in every reply.

Now, I don't know about you, but when I debate someone who has more interest in mocking, insulting, and otherwise demeaning their opponent than civil, rational discussion (or, more accurately, when I grow weary of arguing with said person), I provide them with an ultimatum: correct your behavior to suit this platform, or we have nothing further to discuss. If they ignore this warning, they've explicitly demonstrated their motives to be contradictory to rational discussion, and I thus take measures to discontinue communication with them, varying in severity based on their actions and my ability to do so. Basically, if I were "Hellno", and you acted the way you are known to in my debate, in short order you would find yourself banned. Not because I disagreed with you, as you do, but because you're acting in a manner utterly irreconcilable with civil, rational discussion, the purpose of this platform.

Sure, you can always claim "DECEPTION!!!", but that's neither helpful nor meaningful.