Have you noticed this about atheists?
If someone defines themselves as an atheist to begin with, that is a clear indication of either some type of fetishization or a warning that everything they say can be discredited as being foolishness.
There is no such thing as an atheist. That isn't how it works. Atheists have a god. They have many gods. They are pagan. They are in denial of their gods because they are superstitious and don't understand what gods are. Whether or not they acknowledge The Supreme and Ultimate Reality, this is their God, The One True God of all.
A sick sad and infantile position. Scientific discovery by definition has passed the test of cross examination and peer reviewed reports.
What this person really has a problem with is the fact that no scientist on the planet would ever take these godly arguments seriously. No body of people, no reputable magazine, no respectable organization will ever for the rest of history lend credence or support to deistic claims. Without the support of any credible body to coddle the debator, he has been left with the task of creating repute for evolution in the minds of children, as those before himself had sought to do in his mind. I find it sad and disheartening to find that these narrow mindsets on truth and knowledge are still being propagated today. A smart person has a duty to pass on truth, because without truth and the scientific method humans have no reliable way to come to truth.
Pond scum, I did not say anything about science, but atheism. These mental midgets cannot even read.
And, butt goo, Christians invented modern science. But thanks for you ignorant, irrational and mentally ill opinions. Oh, and let us not forget you to prove the OP while trying to dispute it. ROFL
It is hilarious when these brain dead fools say they cannot know anything apart from science when such is NOT a scientific claim, which means it is self-refuting. Typical atheist moron. God is right, atheists are unreasoning animals.
"Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.
And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing.
And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing.
Charity suffereth long, and is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up,
Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil;
Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth;
Beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things.
Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away.
For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.
But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.
When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.
For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.
And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity."
You’re not in a position to say what’s “illogical “ because of your severe mental retardation , remember this is what you believe you fruit cake ......you believe in talking serpents , virgin births , zombies , talking Donkeys, walking on water messiahs etc , etc , yet Atheists are “ mad “ 🤪🤪🤪 Oooookay 😂😂😂😂😂
Actually what you said about us atheists is total rubbish. I will debate religion and the existence...actually, non existence.. Of your fictional make believe sky god anytime. And at length if you like.
Rather, I tend to find it's you godists who get pissed off and defensive when pressed for details on your adult version of your childhood imaginary friend. LOL
"Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?" Generally attributed to Epicurus.
Not necessarily a disproof of the existence of "God", depending on your definition, though it would seem to be sufficient disproof of a god worthy of worship.
Nice try. The burden of proof is upon those who make extraordinary claims. Like a benevolent, caring, loving, creator of the universe who although has never ever ever shown himself, listens to your prayers. LOL
Yet....you godists cannot offer even mildly compelling evidence of your god...let alone anything remotely resembling proof.
Indeed...all evidence in this world leads to the exact opposite assumption... That we here are under the auspice of no divine creator. Answer me this, genius.....name me one way where we can see even a hint of your god? Name me one example of why anybody should think this world us not driven by pure biology. Show just one visible aspect of your god. Just one.
You cannot do it. All you have is your own ideas and your Bronze Age compendium if Hebrew Mythology you call your holy book.
But maybe you can prove us atheists wrong. I'll be waiting for that one example of a hint of evidence of your god.
More like god is omni-incompetent. Good people murdered and young people slaughtered in the name of these imaginary beings. When will people realize that there is no moral value in these books. How many people have to die, how many children have to be raped? Morals come from our minds. They are ideas. Ideas that have the potential to overcome rigid, murderous ideals propagated by centuries old books. Would it be possible to change these ideologues collective mind? Or is it more likely that these beliefs will pass to the children and onto the next generation and so on, in an everlasting murderous tribute to the gods that humans create.
Your literally not worth my time. The language of Athiests directly stems from science. All arguments are made from the scientific viewpoint that things can be observed and measured, so every single argument will descend from a fundamental understanding of the scietific method and how general information relates to intrinsic and how models can be created from these proven assertions. So therefore no other arguments than those with peer reviewed reports even enter into conversations.
My expectation is that you are angry with all those ‘intellectuals’ which confound your logic and dispute every ignorant blurb you puke on the ground. Every single time I’ve seen you argue, it’s like;
“I said athiesm, not science, you can’t even read”.
What’s the point of refuting this? Do you honestly think other people are going to read your retorts and think your intelligent?
You do your own organization a disservice by opening your mouth.
So please, continue.
This is an excellent parable of how lame the godists are! They know they cannot prove or even show evidence of their fictitious sky god. So they ask atheists to disprove it. But Carl Sagan shows us how hard it is to disprove even the silliest and mist absurd claims. Enjoy!