CreateDebate


Debate Info

3
1
All None
Debate Score:4
Arguments:4
Total Votes:4
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 All (3)
 
 None (1)

Debate Creator

Atrag(5666) pic



Help all asylum seekers or none

Please take these as fact for the purpose of these debate:

All - you take in all asylum applicants from those countries that are known to be suffering war and situations of torture. This means also accepted many fake applicants. Of course there are many expenses to the accepting country but millions of true asylum seekers are helped. 

None - no asylum seekers are accepted whether true or not.

All

Side Score: 3
VS.

None

Side Score: 1
1 point

Hello A:

According to your debate, we either accept ANYBODY who has a story, INCLUDING terrorists, or we accept NOBODY...

I don't accept those parameters.. I think it's possible to vet EVERYBODY and ANYBODY who wants to come here.

excon

Side: All

When you see an extremist analogy that is designed to bait intense trolly debates, it's best to sit back and watch the fireworks rather than get exploded yourself.

Side: All
Atrag(5666) Disputed
1 point

I was interested to see what people would choose if they could only choose to extremes. But anyway if you want to change the subject... there is realistically no way to vet people coming from a particular country. What information would you need to vet them? People wait on average NINETEEEN YEARS in refugee camps waiting to be taken in by western countries.

Side: None
1 point

Tell us Mr bait setter, which of the two is better and why?

This is like communism vs pure free market capitalism... Both are utterly corrupt.

Side: All
No arguments found. Add one!