CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
You can share this debate in three different ways:
#1
#2
#3
Paste this URL into an email or IM:
Click here to send this debate via your default email application.
Click here to login and CreateDebate will send an email for you.
Here is an Idiot from New York ! Do you Dummy Democrats want to meet him ?
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) is calling on the wealthy to return to New York City from their weekend homes in the surrounding suburbs, fearing they may choose to stay and file taxes there.
“I literally talk to people all day long who are now in their Hampton's house who also lived here, or in their Hudson Valley house or in their Connecticut weekend house, and I say, ‘You got to come back, when are you coming back?’” Cuomo said at a press conference Monday.
"'We'll go to dinner, I'll buy you a drink, come over, I’ll cook,'” Cuomo added in jest.
New York's progressive left wing administration led by the two loony lefties, Cuomo and de Blasio seemed to have overlooked that their madcap socialist policies would lead to an enormous increase in crime which in turn would inevitably result in a Great Exodus of the city's heavy taxpaying middle classes and wealth creators.
Unbelievably they seemed not to have realized that when these taxpaying citizens evacuated the left-wing's crime ridden shithole that with them would go the revenue necessary to keep the City's utilities running and the maintenance of its transport systems.
HEY COMMIES, PUT YOUR HOUSE IN ORDER THE WAY GIULIANI DID, AND MAYBE, JUST MAYBE, THE ''REAL NEW YORKERS WILL RETURN.
The self-interested, career obsessed neo-fascist who aided and abetted in covering up the 9/11 attacks and who is now the personal lawyer to the most dishonest person presently alive? That guy?
translation: I'm not prepared to even entertain the possibility I might be wrong and I'm going to pretend that makes you the stupid one. 😆😆😆🤣🤣🤣🤦♂️
Wrong .....again .....I remember your original posting on this nonsense where you actually claimed the janitor at the twin towers had ‘the inside track ‘ and you supported that gibberish by posting up a piece from a Danish crackpot who claimed his ‘findings ‘ were peer reviewed forgetting to tell everyone that it was in a journal he founded.......you’re full of crap mate
But obviously you have just demonstrated that I am completely correct.
I remember your original posting on this nonsense where you actually claimed the janitor at the twin towers had ‘the inside track ‘ and you supported that gibberish by posting up a piece from a Danish crackpot
Nice. But I remember that this "Danish crackpot" is actually a professor of chemistry at the University of Copenhagen, has been for the last thirty years, and proved conclusively that the chemical composition of the WTC dust contained large quantities of military grade thermite.
But obviously you know a lot more than chemistry professors about chemistry, don't you buddy?
Except no Dermot. You're a stupid fucking idiot with no clue how to tie your own shoelaces.
But obviously you have just demonstrated that I am completely correct.
By proving you’re wrong , wow ! you do get confused don’t you ?
Nice. But I remember that this "Danish crackpot" is actually a professor of chemistry at the University of Copenhagen, has been for the last thirty years,
Your constant appeals to ‘authority’ are hilarious and meaningless as Harrit and 7 other conspiracy theorists printed up a paper for a journal which lead to editor resigning because she couldn’t stand by the BS crackpot nonsense of Harret and his ‘buddies’
and proved conclusively that the chemical composition of the WTC dust contained large quantities of military grade thermite.
Gibberish over 250 experts in the field think Harret is unbalanced I agree
But obviously you know a lot more than chemistry professors about chemistry, don't you buddy?
But Harret is a fool and incorrect do you know more than 250 experts in the field who think him a fool?
Except no Dermot. You're a stupid fucking idiot with no clue how to tie your own shoelaces.
Yet I keep correcting you time and time again , are you still whining that 4 people corrected you on your total humiliation on basic science regarding 💦 water 🤣🤣🤣
I frequently wonder to myself how some Americans (because, let's face it: it is always Americans) can be so mindbogglingly stupid. How they can be so stupid that you can show them absolute scientific proof of something obvious and they can respond by laughing as if you've just told them a fart joke.
I frequently wonder to myself how some Americans (because, let's face it: it is always Americans) can be so mindbogglingly stupid. How they can be so stupid that you can show them absolute scientific proof of something obvious and they can respond by laughing as if you've just told them a fart joke.
Actually you do a good job at flying the flag for the UK regards stupidity ......I’m still not American you idiot 🤣🤣🤣🤣
The truly bizarre thing is that, were either Professor Harrit's conclusions, or his analysis of the composition of the WTC dust erroneous, it would be relatively easy to prove had someone else conducted these tests. Then there could be a scientific argument about whose interpretation is correct. But of course nobody else conducted these tests, despite it being an extremely obvious step to take given the circumstances of what happened.
So, we find ourselves in a rather curious position where Professor Harrit, an expert in chemistry, has conducted a scientific analysis of the chemical composition of the WTC dust, you have conducted no such analysis, nobody else you know has conducted such an analysis, yet you are telling him his analysis is wrong.
That speaks volumes about the lack of computing power present in your brain.
The truly bizarre thing is that, were either Professor Harrit's conclusions, or his analysis of the composition of the WTC dust erroneous, it would be relatively easy to prove had someone else conducted these tests. Then there could be a scientific argument about whose interpretation is correct. But of course nobody else conducted these tests, despite it being an extremely obvious step to take given the circumstances of what happened.
You should keep your mouth shut as usual you post lie upon lie up expecting people to accept your conspiracy channel BS , your extended brain dead family probably all agree with your assertions as they know they are automatically Nazis , stooopid or fascists if they disagee so they humor the family dummy.
Sorry mate real scientists disagree with the Danish dolts BS .....
Science weekly
There is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles that you would expect to see from a thermite burn. They say the red/gray chips found in the WTC dust at four sites in New York City are consistent with a carbon-steel coated with an epoxy resin that contains primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments. And there is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips, so the red layer of the red/gray chips is not thermite or nano-thermite.
So, we find ourselves in a rather curious position where Professor Harrit, an expert in chemistry, has conducted a scientific analysis of the chemical composition of the WTC dust, you have conducted no such analysis, nobody else you know has conducted such an analysis, yet you are telling him his analysis is wrong.
Yet a team of experts numbering over 200 disagree with Hair nets assertions
That speaks volumes about the lack of computing power present in your brain.
Actually it speaks more about your lack of brain cells as in your case you agree with someone the world of science think a crackpot and I agree with over 200 Scientists who think him nuts .......Everytime you fall for the latest conspiracy theory all because you’re a gullible half -wit who knows nothing about science although you’re ‘red hot’ at pseudoscience🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣���🤣
You should keep your mouth shut as usual you post lie upon lie
What exactly am I lying about you stupid fascist twat?
to accept your conspiracy channel BS
So while I link scientific evidence, your counterargument is to call me names? Conspiracy theorist, blah, blah, blah. I've heard it all before mate. You're just absolutely stupid if you think I'm going to ignore science because I'm frightened of offensive idiots like you calling me names.
Science weekly
LOL! There are no peer-reviewed scientific refutations of Harrit's paper you ridiculous LIAR. I have been looking for one for the past 11 years. I guess that explains why you have included no link. I did some further investigation just to illustrate what a ridiculous liar you are.
You did not get the information from anywhere called "Science Weekly", which explains why you did not link Science Weekly. You got the information from a rather suspicious looking blog called machinedesign.com. It was written by a self-declared electrical engineer (i.e. somebody with no qualifications in chemistry) and ex-government employee called Lee Teschler.
Teschler named mvascientificconsultants.com as the company which had supposedly conducted these tests, but a search of their website reveals no such tests or test results anywhere:-
Furthermore, since this is a private fee-charging business, it is not part of the scientific peer-review process which ensures any scientific results it procures are accurate and unbiased.
Indeed, a little closer scrutiny shows that this supposed "study" has not been scientifically peer reviewed and it appears in ZERO scientific journals. The only place it is available is a private dropbox link, so that should confirm to anybody with half a functional brain cell that it is not science. Unfortunately I don't think that includes you, does it? 🤣
By early 2009, the residue testing that NIST refused to do had been done by independent researchers, and reported on in a peer-reviewed chemistry journal. Small bi-layered chips, found consistently in dust samples, have layers of red nano-engineered material that is clearly aluminothermic: it has sub-micron-diameter particles of largely of elemental aluminum, and smaller crystalline grains of primarily Fe2O3. On ignition, the chips produce temperatures above the melting point of iron, leaving tiny iron droplets matching the residues of commercial thermite pyrotechnics.
The publication of these results should be astounding to anyone who uncritically accepted the collapse explanations in TV documentaries and never looked seriously at any of the several bodies of evidence for controlled demolition.
The NIST investigation, having posted its Final Report with its absurd Building 7 joint-breaking-thermal-expansion theory in late 2008 and FAQ by Christmas, closed its doors before the independent researchers published their findings of active aluminothermic materials in WTC dust in a mainstream scientific journal; but not before they publicized findings of aluminothermic residues in the same dust samples; and not before they extracted from NIST a series of public statements, in press conferences and in written responses to requests for correction (RFCs), about the conduct of their inquiry into the cause of the skyscrapers' total destruction.
And once again, like the duplicitous, evil little bastard you are, you simply accuse me of your own crimes. I linked you to a peer-reviewed paper in a scientific journal which evidences that the WTC buildings were loaded with thermite, and in response you linked a blog written by an electrician, and lied that you found it somewhere called "Science Weekly".
A debate is about finding the truth, but since you are demonstrably and visibly dishonest, no conversation with you can ever lead there.
And once again, like the duplicitous, evil little bastard you are, you simply accuse me of your own crimes.
I called it like it is , Harrit is a laughing stock to all except you
linked you to a peer-reviewed paper in a scientific journal
Nonsense , he had a paper published in a journal he had shares in you idiot
which evidences that the WTC buildings were loaded with thermite, and in response you linked a blog written by an electrician, and lied that you found it somewhere called "Science Weekly".
Rubbish , do you want a link to Popular Mechanics or Rational Wiki ?
A debate is about finding the truth,
An alien concept to you and you don’t debate you screech at anyone who disagrees with your continuous line of BS
but since you are demonstrably and visibly dishonest, no conversation with you can ever lead there.
You demonstrably did the exact opposite of that. You are a fascist who turns every fact upside down in a never-ending display of vulgar, obnoxious bullshit
Harrit is a laughing stock
No, Harrit is a professor of chemistry at the University of Copenhagen, has been for the last 30 years, and is extremely well respected in his field of study. When you don't like something you call it names. It's very childish.
Nonsense
Only you could literally stare at the proof and still insist the opposite:-
You demonstrably did the exact opposite of that. You are a fascist who turns every fact upside down in a never-ending display of vulgar, obnoxious bullshit
🤣🤣🤣Translation : I beat you into a pulp .....again
No, Harrit is a professor of chemistry at the University of Copenhagen, has been for the last 30 years, and is extremely well respected in his field of study.
🤣🤣🤣 Which is why the world of science thinks he’s a nut ....I agree
When you don't like something you call it names. It's very childish.
Which is why in the last hour you’ve been engaged in name calling .....🤣🤣🤣
Only you could literally stare at the proof and still insist the opposite:-
You didn’t link “scientific evidence “ you linked the opinion of a crackpot who posted his BS in a journal and called it “peer reviewed “ the editor resigned because she wouldn’t stand behind the BS Harrit was persuading others to post
Harriet has been dismissed by real Scientists who actually do science and haven’t an agenda like Hair - net Harrit , Rational Wiki has chapter and verse on this debunked Bullshit , you need to catch on son
Harrit is a laughing stock among actual scientists and his followers include the usual rag tag of idiots like you who believe anything once it’s anti American ......you’re an idiot mate
I'm not playing this game of opposites with you where you just literally accuse me of everything you have done. You were just caught LYING about the source of your own information. That's a fact, and nothing which comes out of your verminous mouth will change that.
I'm playing the game of opposites with you where I just literally accuse you of everything I have done. I was just caught LYING about the source of my own information. That's a fact, and nothing which comes out of my verminous mouth will change that.
Well, why don't you see if you can have your ridiculous claims peer-reviewed, then get back to me.
Why? 200 odd scientists disagee with the mentally insane Danish dolt Harrit .......get back to me when you have actual science behind which will be never 👋👋🤗
Why? 200 odd scientists disagee with the mentally insane Danish dolt
That's amusing, you ridiculously stupid troll. According to your random number generator, 200 scientists disagree with Professor Harrit, but not one of them has bothered to write a paper, have it peer reviewed, and publish their results in a science journal? That's what you are asking us to believe?
🤣
You're just such an idiot. Just so reprehensibly stupid.
That's amusing, you ridiculously stupid troll. According to your random number generator, 200 scientists disagree with Professor Harrit, but not one of them has bothered to write a paper, have it peer reviewed, and publish their results in a science journal?
Nonsense do some research you lazy fuck Harrit is a chancer and a nut
That's what you are asking us to believe?
Us ? The only one believes your fable is you and maybe Aesop if he were alive 🤣🤣🤣🤣
🤣
You're just such an idiot. Just so reprehensibly stupid.
Then the douche bag had this to say - “I’m not going to let Washington off the hook,” Cuomo said. “They have to deliver. ... Don’t pass a piece of legislation that doesn’t restore New York’s funds.”
So the idiot wants the American people to bail his ignorant ass out.
Well why don't he just ask brother Chris for the money he needs.
It's difficult to believe that even the left-wing filth are incapable of understanding why those achievers who have earned the luxury of being able to live and operate away from the Bongo and ANTIFA hellhole which New York's communist administration have created, do so.
The scum scucking radical leftist pigs are now going to GO WITH THEIR BEGGING BOWLS to central government for a bailout, just as the other left-wing/Bongo controlled cities such as Detroit and Chicago have being doing for years.
How long will it take for the loony leftists to understand the workings of the world in which they live?.
The fading grandeur of the once great city of New York has been turned into a bankrupt, crumbling third world cesspit Bongo and extreme left wing warzone.
They do everything to insult them, demonize them and create a hostile climate for them, then wonder why they're leaving. The left does to the "rich" what they do to the police: throw them under the bus. Can they not figure out why the wealthy are leaving and crime is soaring?
They do everything to insult them, demonize them and create a hostile climate for them, then wonder why they're leaving.
You literally belong in a psychiatric unit. You are posting in a debate attacking the left, you are attacking the left personally, and while you are doing that you are complaining about the left attacking you.
What? Are you on drugs? Have you been smoking some of that wacky tobacky? You make absolutely no sense, whatsoever. But, that is par for the course for you.
What? Are you on drugs? Have you been smoking some of that wacky tobacky?
You're an idiot and that is glaringly evident from reading your obnoxious fascist bullshit for longer than thirty seconds. You don't have any points or arguments. You simply jump online to attack the left every couple of hours.
