CreateDebate


Debate Info

2
9
Yes Yes
Debate Score:11
Arguments:9
Total Votes:16
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes (2)

Debate Creator

TangoAndCash(16) pic



Hillary Clinton negotiated with the DOJ to wipe the server clean

Yes

Side Score: 2
VS.

Yes

Side Score: 9
-1 points

Hello T:

OMG!! But, what about Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi? And, Vince Foster, and her gayness, and uranium one, and the child sex ring she ran out of the pizza joint??

Those are much more important to the security of this great country than her server. No?

excon

Side: Yes
Amarel(5669) Disputed
2 points

No. Benghazi illustrated her gross negligence, her atttude toward it was sociopathic, and her lies about it showed she is politician. Her Clinton Foundation quid pro quo is criminal though.

As for her servers:

If a service member mishandled classified information this egregiously, they would be in Leavenworth. The criminal nature of her activity was thoroughly presented by Comey, who then guessed at innocent intent (which is irrelevant to the law in question) and recommended no charges. According to the IG interview with Comey, this was to avoid the Putting Obama’s DOJ on the hook for letting her off.

PS. Pointing this out and linking to the IG report itself is what got me permabanned from Rusticus debates.

Side: Yes
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
2 points

STUPOR STUPID you believe the lies of the parrot known as Susan Rice ??????????

In 2012 Obama’s UN Ambassador Susan Rice appeared on a number of Sunday talk shows to hammer home the chosen talking points on Benghazi. She blamed some Internet video for what was clearly a terrorist attack perpetrated on the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. The Chicago Tribune explains:“The Obama administration’s primary sin was that it didn’t level with the American people about what had happened in Benghazi. The narrative triumphed over the facts. Much of this was known before. For example, White House messaging guru Ben Rhodes had drafted talking points which urged U.S. officials to emphasize that the attack stemmed from a protest of the video and not a failure in policy. But the final report adds some important details on this.

“But narratives are not everything. And this is a lesson that Obama has yet to learn. Whether it’s his attorney general excising Orlando shooter Omar Mateen’s references to Islamic State in his 911 calls, or the White House’s decision to call terror rampages “mass shootings,” the narrative often seems more important than the policy it’s meant to sell. Nearly four years ago in Benghazi, the president’s narrative about terrorism and Libya went up in flames. The story his administration told about a protest and an internet video couldn’t save it.”

https://www.dcstatesman.com/flashback-susan-rice-lies-benghazi-refuses-resign/

STUPOR STUPID you Lefty's just avoid any facts.

Side: Yes
UncleWanker(74) Disputed
1 point

Hello A:

I've heard the accusations..

You forgot the intentional targeting of the opposition candidate by weaponizing the FBI and framing Donald Trump. It's getting nasty ugly for the Democrats the further we go along.

Suddenly you don't care about Russians, collusion, obstruction, tyrany. Oh no. It's all off your list of concerns now.

Side: Yes
Funk_Machine(-1) Disputed
0 points

OMG!! But, what about Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi? And, Vince Foster, and her gayness, and uranium one, and the child sex ring she ran out of the pizza joint??

But what about: "I'm a Jew, I'm a Jew, I'm a Jew, and if you don't believe me then you hate Jews"? And: "You used science to debunk the claim, made by religious Jews, that my DNA is Jewish, therefore you hate science"?

Your credibility is zero because you are a pathetically dishonest worm who cares about facts only up until the point that they disprove him.

See:-

Genetic markers cannot determine Jewish descent

There is no Jewish genotype to identify.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4301023/

See:-

None of the books being considered claims that there are genetic elements that are characteristic of all or even a large majority of Jews.

https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2012/12/06/is-there-a-jewish-gene/

See:-

New study sheds light on the origin of the European Jewish population

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/01/130116195333.htm

See:-

"Jews a genetic race" theory attacked by DNA expert

Scientists usually don’t call each other “liars” and “frauds.”

But that’s how Johns Hopkins University post-doctoral researcher Eran Elhaik describes a group of widely respected geneticists, including Harry Ostrer, professor of pathology and genetics at Yeshiva University’s Albert Einstein College of Medicine and author of the 2012 book “Legacy: A Genetic History of the Jewish People.”

https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2013/05/07/jews-a-genetic-race-theory-attacked-by-dna-expert/

See:-

Last year, we applied GPS to the genome of ~400 Ashkenazic Jews (Das et al. 2016). GPS localized most AJs along major ancient trade routes in northeastern Turkey adjacent to primeval villages with names that resemble the word “Ashkenaz”

This is the first and only place in the world named Ashkenaz and it was compatible with biogeographical evidence. It was also compatible with the hypothesis of an Irano-Turko-Slavic origin for AJs and a Slavic origin for Yiddish, proposed by Paul Wexler, and at odds with the Rhineland hypothesis advocating a Levantine origin for AJs and German origins for Yiddish – supported by many linguists.

https://tinthor.org/2017/11/17/no-levantine-ancestry-for-ashkenazic-jews/

See:-

Surprise: Ashkenazi Jews Are Genetically European

https://www.livescience.com/40247-ashkenazi-jews-have-european-genes.html

See:-

Are Ashkenazi Jews really Jews? Are they even of the Semitic blood line?

All the evidence says no, they are not of Semitic blood line.

http://www.lasttrumpet.org/ashkenazi.htm

But it's OK. Con has the word of religious Israeli Jews to back him up. Don't dare deny his "science"!! Lmfao.

Side: Yes
No arguments found. Add one!