How evil must you be to support a child molester attacking a kid?
Pretty damn evil
Side Score: 9
|
I hate kids
Side Score: 5
|
|
|
|
1
point
What's your your problem? Rittenhouse murdered him and got away with it This begs the question: is murder more evil than child rape and even if it is, is it 100% "murder" or is it at least some part self defense? I think it was about 50% murder and 50�fense since he put himself in that situation in the first place but also shot two people who were both attacking him and further endangering everyone there by attacking someone who was carrying a dangerous weapon. So far the act is only 50% evil but assuming that child rape and murder are both 100% evil if he shot a child rapist then he cleansed the universe of a piece of 100% evil while doing it thus reducing how evil it was by half. Therefore him shooting those guys was only 25% evil. Side: I hate kids
1
point
What's your your problem? Rittenhouse murdered him and got away with it.. A kid being attacked on the ground and defending himself isn't murder. You're either evil, or you're just too stupid to understand what murder is. We both know you wouldn't dare say a Democrat's child should allow a child molester to try and kill him while on the ground, so go fuck yourself you sick fuck. Your love for child molesters is yet another sign of what you really are. Side: Pretty damn evil
The predictable inflammatory consequences of Rittenhouse's militaristic confrontation with a mob of highly charged demonstrators will only serve to further polarize an already deeply divided nation. This otherwise insignificant little pipsqueak should have been at home in bed sucking his thumb and hugging his teddy bear. Clearly this militant adolescent wasn't brought-up, he was dragged-up by negligent parents who didn't teach him the values of decency and why it is important to let your opponents have unhindered freedom to give voice to their grievances whether they be misguided or real. Side: Pretty damn evil
1
point
1
point
|
Assuming it is a fact that one of Rittenhouse's victims was a child molester has no connection to the Kenosha incident whatsoever. Rittenhouse allegedly shot his victim as an act of self-defence and not because the assailant was a paedophile. The best place for a paedophile is the Morgue but that is a totally different issue. Side: I hate kids
1
point
Well, if the argument here is that one should not defend oneself against an armed assassin on the grounds that the said assailant MAY be under-age then I would strongly suggest that you make sure your life-insurance is significantly topped up and includes Death by Gunshots Fired by a Minor. I'm sure if the deceased victims could sit up and talk, they'd say that they're just as irked at having their lives prematurely cut short by a 18 year old as they would have by ''dead-eye-Dick the sniper'' from the local Old People's Home. Side: I hate kids
The lesson behind this gruesome event is, do your demonstrating and counter-demonstrating AT THE BALLOT BOX. America was always fairly well divided between Democrats and Republicans but for the past number of years a massive chasm has developed between the two ideologies that has resulted in a bitterness not seen since the civil war. Everyone needs to cool down and retreat from the spectre of another civil war ( which at the present rate is just around the corner), that will benefit nobody, but harm everyone. GOD BLESS AMERICA. Side: I hate kids
|