IS eating a hamburger the global warming equivalent of driving a Hummer?
"This week an article in The Times of London carried a headline that blared: “Give Up Meat to Save the Planet.” Former Vice President Al Gore, who has made climate change his signature issue, has even been assailed for omnivorous eating by animal rights activists."
Yes
Side Score: 12
|
 |
Hell no!
Side Score: 5
|
|
|
|
|
2
points
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
|
The article refers to 'climate change'. The global warming fallacy is nothing more nor less than a whole lot of hot air. When the climate of the Earth is in a cooling phase, it is man- made when it is too cool. When the climate of the Earth is in a heating phase, it is man-made when it is too warm. Climate Change means this: I will be taxed when the climate is cooling. I will also be taxed when the climate is warming. Now that my friend is WHY politicians no longer use the term Global Warming, and instead prefer Climate Change. (Oh my government, we are all gonna die if we don't stop climate change!!! Help us we pray thee! In the name of the legislative, the executive and the judicial ---AMEN) Side: Hell no!
I speak of quantities, and am not attempting to dispell the former. One who owns a hummer must initially be in a ludicrous state of mind, one which is inclined to drive excessively as to avoid judgement from others for not being "well equipped". Inherently, said person contributes a larger quantity of pollution than the common carnivore. Consider this. If everyone who ate hamburgers instead drove hummers, would pollution decrease. I am under the impression of the inverse. Side: Hell no!
0
points
|
