CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
You can share this debate in three different ways:
#1
#2
#3
Paste this URL into an email or IM:
Click here to send this debate via your default email application.
Click here to login and CreateDebate will send an email for you.
If God were allowed in the classroom, WHO'S God would it be??
Hello:
The
1st Amendment calls for freedom of religion.. Accordingly, if ONE
religion can be in the public classroom, then ALL religions can be in the
classroom.
Some
people would suggest that the community could VOTE on which religion
would be allowed in, and which religion wouldn't.. That SAME person
would argue that NOBODY can vote out his right to own a gun..
I hate being on this side, but, if I went on the other some Chinese guy would accuse me of siding with "Mooseslimes"!
It seems to me, if a REAL "god" wanted to be in classrooms, NOBODY could stop S/HE/IT! But, no. NO "god" apparently, WANTS to be in them bad enough to SHOW UP and make S?HE?IT's wishes known! S/HE/IT leaves the decision to the people. The people of THIS country have decided, by majority AND SCOTUS, several times (without objection from said "gods" ;-), that we MUST respect ALL "gods" and beliefs. MY gods agree ;-).
How can you NOT support the religion of illegal immigrants, which is, by and large, Christian!?? You do not even support THEIR First Amendment rights after they've lived here for YEARS! Everyone in this country has those rights …. even non-citizens!
I DO oppose religion, but I DO NOT oppose religious rights ...as laid out in the Constitution of this "Constitutional Republic"! "There is some real confusion" … here because conservatives do not accept that Constitution as written, only as "CON venient"! It doesn't separate "he, she or it", it calls them WE, THE PEOPLE! THAT is the democracy protected in this Constitutional Republic, by that Bill of Rights! You are correct, there is some confusion here … and it's YOURS! ;-)
Lol. I'm just imagining a very mundane god being in class like nbd. Not announcing themselves, just throwing tape balls into some other kid's hair or something. Doodling ideas for the next existence they're thinking of creating. Etc.
The 1st Amendment calls for freedom of religion.. Accordingly, if ONE religion can be in the public classroom, then ALL religions can be in the classroom.
Some people would suggest that the community could VOTE on which religion would be allowed in, and which religion wouldn't.. That SAME person would argue that NOBODY can vote out his right to own a gun..
Huh?
It is easy to see that the Democrat is confused by the 1st and 2nd Amendment.
And Democrats want tooooooooo try and convey some type of message with this confusion.
Like if you're gonna harp on about the same spooks at least make it interesting. Like, throw some laser vision dino's into the mix or something. This is just, broken record player and the record was carp to begin with.
life cannot become meaningless after birth because it was not meaningful to begin with. there is no loss of that which never existed in the first place.
Hopefully the one who's book built the west and not the one who tells you to cut LGBT people's heads off or the one that tells you you can't eat any steak or the ones that tell you to dance naked in the woods and take hallucinogenic mushrooms.
Dancing naked in the woods and taking hallucinogenic mushrooms sounds fine, actually. Less violent than the west has been, too. Yeah, y'know, what the heck. I'm throwing in with Nudey Shrooms. All hail. Class dismissed.
The 1st Amendment calls for freedom of religion.. Accordingly, if ONE religion can be in the public classroom, then ALL religions can be in the classroom.
Some people would suggest that the community could VOTE on which religion would be allowed in, and which religion wouldn't.. That SAME person would argue that NOBODY can vote out his right to own a gun..
Huh?
Quite clear why the Democrat said Huh at the end of it's confusing question to it's self.
"What does your delusion have to do with the Second Amendment?" You should ask that while looking in a mirror.
Then you could ask, while looking in a mirror, "What could the Second Amendment do for ME?" Well, it could open your mind and erase your delusion … if you did the right thing … for the Constitutional Republic, that is. ;-)
Those on the Left always try to scare people into censoring our constitutionally protected freedom of religious expression, by saying if we allow religious freedom, there will be communties who want to worship Satan, and have child sacrifices on public land.
This nonsense is the biggest lie ever perpetrated on a people. Under that insane logic, we should all hide in our basements in case Muslims someday take over and started cutting off the heads of Gay people and non believers.
Stop unjustly banning people from your debates after shitposting or the upvotes will cease and potentially reverse. This is your last and final offer and warning.
According to people like Excon, if every person in a community does not agree with the majority rule, then we must censor their right's to choose how they wish to run their schools.
Funny how these same hypocrites, like Excon, have no problem allowng Transgenders to be talking to our children in public schools.
Why does the Left get to choose the controversial groups getting to indoctrinate our children in public schools, but those who do not agree have no say?
I am fine with a community choosing not to have guns in their schools. That is the freedom I speak to!
I would want to live in a community that allowed the Principal or trained teachers to have guns to protect my children. But then again, I love my children.
Owning a gun is protected under our Constitution, regardless if you don't agree.
Religion likewise has the Constitutional freedom of expression whether you agree or not. I am ok without God being talked about in school, as long as you hypocrite leftists keep your LGBT dysfunction, and other controversial topics, away from my children in schools.
When you actually start having tolerance and respect for people who do not agree with your LGBT and abortion extremism, I will show you some respect as well.