CreateDebate


Debate Info

17
10
He DOES, of course Trump can do no wrong
Debate Score:27
Arguments:17
Total Votes:27
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 He DOES, of course (10)
 
 Trump can do no wrong (7)

Debate Creator

excon(14592) pic



If a cake baker has a right to free speech at work, why doesn't an NFL player?


He DOES, of course

Side Score: 17
VS.

Trump can do no wrong

Side Score: 10

The baker has the right because he's the owner and made the rules.

The players do not, because they aren't the owners, and the owners, who make the rules, now say no. If their employer, the NFL said yes, they could take a knee.

Roseanne made statements, her employer didn't like it, felt it reflected bad on them and their brand, and she's gone.

"Freedom of speech" simply means the government cannot infringe on your speech or prosecute you for your speech. Nothing more.

In these cases, the employer decides if political statements can be made on his or her time or at all, by their employee. It's their time. It's their brand.

Side: He DOES, of course
excon(14592) Disputed
1 point

Hello again, bront:

Ok... So, the school CAN prevent the teacher from wearing a MAGA shirt...

excon

Side: Trump can do no wrong
outlaw60(15500) Disputed
2 points

If a cake baker has a right to free speech at work, why doesn't an NFL player?

Mental Midget what does the below have to do with the title of your post.

So, the school CAN prevent the teacher from wearing a MAGA shirt...

excon

LMMFAO watching you spin is just to much fun you Mental Midget

Side: He DOES, of course
1 point

Looks like you nailed it...*

Side: He DOES, of course
outlaw60(15500) Disputed
1 point

Mental Midget i was under the assumption that you despised the rich. That must not be an issue any longer for the Brain Dead Progressives.

Side: He DOES, of course
John_C_1812(279) Disputed
1 point

The legal argument is not as simple as ownership. As the burden of blame is placed on the United States Constitution. It is over the complex act of perjury that is created over the official recording of the plagiarism which takes place with the use of the word marriage.

It is, it was, a long standing likely-hood and has self-value which disqualifies it from the freedom of speech.

Side: Trump can do no wrong
4 points

Uh huh. That's why the NFL just banned taking a knee with no legal action taken against it.

That's why the Supreme Court voted for the Baker.

Side: He DOES, of course

Using a United State constitutional separation. These arguments are not free speech issue inside the First Amendment. They are both about filing grievance and the abilities of public assembly.

Free speech is a First Amendment issue and is right as described as self-evident truth, set in writing by the Republic of the United States of America. The football play is in fact not practicing free-speech, presuming this is about the player who took a knee during the pledge he is filing grievance using the media attention he receives from working for the NFL. All this while refusing any allegiance to the very republic which is holding the United States constitutional principle that has been amendment to include the first Amendment as one of its many flags.

The pledge does not mention the Republics Constitution by name. Only that the United States of America as a representation of the flag. It then goes on to include the republic that has used the United States Constitution to create the many United States by truth that can be held as self-evident.

It is not clear the baker understands constitutional right form constitutional wrong. So the baker may rely on moral precedent.

As we look at complicated public relationships and likely-hood by private contracts, and legal precedent. The legal state that is united between couples and political governing is citizens of a country. As this creation is limited in nature to men and woman acting as a united couple there is a legal burden transferred to the public that is shared by political policy. Free means the principle of state in debate must have no cost, and must also have no self-value. Marriage has a self-value that is not enforced by the baker.

Even if a jury were to rule that Free speech is expressed by a couple of equal gender while it plagiarized the likely-hood of marriage. The lack of any self-value does not create immunity to the complex laws of perjury that are being broken. As the complex perjury is associated to the way in which witnesses are directed, as the baker in fact is included as witness and no legal separation process is conducted by the act if commerce. There are some self-evident truths that can be described as inalienable.

Paying to bribe a witness, is in basic principle paying to bribe a witness. A consummation of an equal gender relationship does not need to take place before witness, ever. The source of addition citizens of a country will come from other licensed sources of that country on all accounts.

Hope this helps I tried to explain it as simply as possible.

Side: He DOES, of course
2 points

He who pays the piper calls the tune.

The baker is the organ grinder, the NFL player is the monkey.

Side: Trump can do no wrong
2 points

Now Water Boy you are a Mental Midget LMMFAO

Let's take a look at how stupid you really are.

NFL will reach $14 billion in 2017 revenue. Commissioner Roger Goodell said seven years ago that he'd like the NFL to reach $25 billion in annual revenue by 2027. The league is roughly on track to get there. Daniel Kaplan of SportsBusiness Journal reports that the NFL expects to generate $14 billion in 2017.Mar 6, 2017

Mental Midget where does the NFL income come from ???????

Attaching the Baker to the NFL shows your brain does not work as Designed

Side: Trump can do no wrong
2 points

If a cake baker has a right to free speech at work, why doesn't an NFL player?

Let's ask this question for the Mental Midget

Do the owners of the NFL teams just pay the multimillionaire victims out of their pockets ? https://www.statista.com/statistics/675385/average-nfl-salary-by-team/

Side: Trump can do no wrong

An NFL player works for a business, the NFL! A private business has rules that the employees must follow. If they don't want to follow the rules, they can find another job somewhere else.

The baker was being told how he must run his business. Can you grasp the difference?

If you try to equate a person's sexual orientation with a person's skin color, it is ignore time! I can't debate mindless stupidity.

Side: Trump can do no wrong