#1 |
#2 |
#3 |
Paste this URL into an email or IM: |
Click here to send this debate via your default email application.
|
Click here to login and CreateDebate will send an email for you.
|
If animals could talk, which would be the rudest?
Spuds
Side Score: 30
|
Another animal
Side Score: 30
|
|
No arguments found. Add one!
|
1
point
1
point
1
point
So....to fight his spam nonsense, you create even more spam nonsense? That's a little back asswards there. You aren't winning when you do that, you just contribute to making it impossible for anyone else to enjoy a good debate. But then I suppose you aren't really interested in debating since you've done nothing but try to be insulting any debate, regardless of topic. Side: Another animal
So....to fight his spam nonsense, you create even more spam nonsense? Another way of looking at it is fighting fire with fire. Perhaps you would just happily walk to the gas chamber when under attack by Nazis, but then again you do have a reputation for being mentally weak. Side: Spuds
There's fighting a good fight, and then there's knowing when the fight is utterly ridiculous. You can't seem to distinguish between the two. You also need to adjust what your version of being mentally weak actually is. Especially when you have to have multiple identities to get a point across so you can pretend like your opinion is more prominent than it actually is. Side: Another animal
There's fighting a good fight, and then there's knowing when the fight is utterly ridiculous. Sure, you're absolutely right. We should all let ourselves get bullied off web platforms by internet terrorists. When we debate them and win, we should simply accept their punishment of 200 plus downvotes because it's fair. Go away you pathetically biased old hag. Side: Spuds
Go away you pathetically biased old hag. I'm actually tired of seeing all the personal attack debates being spammed on here. Nom this, Bront that, Dermot this, Excon that. There was one day where the entire page was nothing but that nonsense. I never thought I'd say this but I actually miss the days where it was political debates instead of personal. Regardless, what's important in a debate is how you respond, the points are inconsequential. It's hard to take anyone's opinion seriously if all they do is toss out insults. Side: Another animal
I'm actually tired of seeing all the personal attack debates being spammed on here. Nom this, Bront that, Dermot this, Excon that. Do I look as though I give a shit? I'm tired of being attacked by you every time I respond to a lie uttered by Dermot, so I guess we're both experiencing fatgiue. I actually miss the days where it was political debates instead of personal. You are drastically missing the point. You can't debate people who lie, cheat and abuse reason, because they are not there to debate in the first place. The only people who need to lie, cheat and abuse reason are those pushing a political ideology, and the proliferation of political propaganda is not the same thing as debate. Side: Spuds
Your obsession with me , Bront , Excon , Amarel , Mint etc, etc LOL. So wait, I'm obsessed with EVERYONE? Clearly, that's just another way of saying that I'm not obsessed with anyone in particular. The way you abuse language is shocking and nauseating all at the same time. Side: Spuds
, LOL. So wait, I'm obsessed with EVERYONE? Clearly, that's just another way of saying that I'm not obsessed with anyone in particular. Yeah , 14 debates regarding Bront today , 4 regarding Excon and 2 on me yesterday you need medical help The way I abuse language is shocking and nauseating all at the same time. I know Side: Another animal
Yeah , 14 debates regarding Bront today Not by me there weren't. It appears as though you are delusional as well as stupid. 4 regarding Excon You are literally making this up, aren't you? What is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. So that gives me the right to essentially ignore every retarded word which leaves your lying mouth. Side: Spuds
he takes everything as a personal attack lying as usual Nom your insanity is escalating. Yeah, you're right. I shouldn't interpret that as a personal attack. Obviously there is a school somewhere in Ireland which is missing a 12 year old. You are quite literally pathetically stupid and it's difficult to even pity you with the stinking rotten attitude you have. Side: Spuds
Yeah, you're right. I shouldn't interpret that as a personal attack. Yeah Mint asked you a simple question and you flew into a rage because you cannot debate Obviously there is a school somewhere in Ireland which is missing a 12 year old. You are quite literally pathetically stupid and it's difficult to even pity you with the stinking rotten attitude you have. But you believe steel doesn't melt because a Danish failure told you so ..... Side: Another animal
I'm tired of being attacked by you every time I respond to a lie uttered by Dermot, so I guess we're both experiencing fatgiue. Did you conveniently forget that you are the one that started having a go at me in this debate? Also, I've never "attacked" you. I've tried to debate with you, which for some reason you take as a personal attack, but I've never had a go at you or resorted to personally insulting you. Side: Another animal
he takes everything as a personal attack This is a fallacy commonly used by liars and bullshit artists. They arbitrarily expand an accusation specific to them into "everyone" or "everything" in order to attack its credibility. The only thing you ever use this site for is making personal attacks because you are a lowlife coward without any friends. Side: Another animal
This is a fallacy commonly used by liars and bullshit artists Says the compulsive liar Nom who hides behind alt accounts so he can post 15 to 20 debates a day and night attacking others . They arbitrarily expand an accusation specific to them into "everyone" or "everything" in order to attack its credibility. The truth is there for all to see you nutter everyone of your posts ends with a personal attack, your denial is typical The only thing you ever use this site for is making personal attacks because you are a lowlife coward without any friends. Nom projection yet again as you’re the one who attacks everyone without exception your cowardice can also be seen from your constant use of alt accounts to attack others , that your friendless is also a given Your latest rage is all because you didn’t know the meaning of Socialism and claimed European countries with social welfare policies were Socialist , when I corrected you as usual you flew into a rage and posted up several debates launching your typical childish debates in frustration at your own genetic stupidity Side: Spuds
They arbitrarily expand an accusation specific to them into "everyone" or "everything" in order to attack its credibility. The only thing you ever use this site for is making personal attacks..... Yet again. The debates speak for themselves. You just pointed out everything you do and did in this debate alone. Liars and bullshit artist indeed. Anyways, pleasure chatting with you, have a good night. Side: Spuds
You just pointed out everything you do and did in this debate alone. I gave a literal description of the post I replied to you delusional old crone. Can you even read English? Why are you even still replying to me? I've told you twice already that I don't give a shit what you say because it's all stupid. You're a militantly religious, irrational clown of a woman, who thinks reflecting accusations back at the accuser (i.e. the tu quoque fallacy) is a form of debate. Side: Another animal
Did you conveniently forget that you are the one that started having a go at me in this debate? Nice attempt at changing the subject, but you leap at me like a hungry dog every time I argue with Dermot, who just happens to be a pathological liar. Your loyalty to him is more important than who is in the right, and for that reason you are an inferior human being. Did you "conveniently forget" that blind loyalty absent argument or reason is what caused the Holocaust? Also, I've never "attacked" you. Thankfully, it is not up to the attacker to decide whether or not they have attacked someone. Side: Spuds
To prove who the pathological liar is one only has to look at you in action as you launch another attack on a C D member for merely asking you a question which is something you say you don’t do , also look at the 15 to 20 topics you posted up in the last day attacking others which again you deny proving you’re the pathological liar . Side: Another animal
I didn't change the subject at all, simply pointed out that your own defense was wrong. I debate with you when I believe you are wrong, not because I'm loyal to anyone. Dermot and I have had debates where we don't agree at all but, and I know this astonishes you, we can disagree without making things personal. Thankfully, it is not up to the attacker to decide whether or not they have attacked someone. Once again, the evidence is in the debates. You came on here first and had a go at me in a debate that had nothing to do with you. You made it personal first and now you're trying to claim it was defense. Side: Another animal
Correct. I know I was correct, thank you for pointing that out. Pointing out the flaw in your argument isn't changing the subject, however you trying to pretend like it is and then coming back with that as a counter as the basis for dodging your flaw, is essentially trying to change the subject through smoke screen. Side: Another animal
I'm attempting to respond to your aggression in a way that doesn't resort to vulgarity and personal attacks. Attempting. I've probably slipped a few times and have been slightly insulting. Mostly I'm attacking your debate/response style and questioning your methods as well as pointing out the obvious. You HAVE been hyper aggressive in debates that don't even call for it. Such as this one. Side: Another animal
1
point
Lol. Says the pub bomber Not lately mate , the Muslims are giving yous enough to piss yourselves about . Sorry Dermot, but I don't lend much weight to the opinion of Irish terrorists Indeed , you prefer the opinions of fellow conspiracy channel nutters who fill the time up between Jobcentre visits by making fertiliser bombs. Projection again Nom you’ve still had no luck in securing a position , never mind you can carry on here 24/7 like you always do ......Give my regards to flame face Westin 👋😂😂😂👌 Side: Another animal
Not lately mate Well, at least you admit it. That's something, I guess. Indeed , you prefer the opinions of fellow conspiracy channel nutters Claims the IRA was a make-believe paramilitary unit invented by the British government (despite the dozens of bombings and other violence). Calls other people "conspiracy theorists". You can see the level of dickhead we are dealing with here. Side: Spuds
Well, at least you admit it. That's something, I guess. Nom is crying 😢 Nom is crying 😢 Claims the IRA was a make-believe paramilitary unit invented by the British government (despite the dozens of bombings and other violence). Calls other people "conspiracy theorists". I never said they were make believe you cretin , as usual you you’re on the wrong page You can see the level of dickhead you are dealing with here I agree you’re a dickhead Side: Another animal
Nom is crying 😢 Nom is crying 😢 Well that settles it. You literally do have the mental age of a 10 year old. I never said they were make believe you cretin LOL! So you are a liar as well as a conspiracy theorist? You're really ticking all the boxes today aren't you? You dirty little thieving tinker. Side: Spuds
Do you also know that I am genetically retarded ? Yes Ireland has wreaked havoc on England in the past and we still shit ourselves Boo ....Now go clean that pool of shit up For some reason you act as though you do not realise or even understand the superiority of my gene pool. Side: Another animal
|