CreateDebate


Debate Info

11
8
That's true I'd be pissed anyway
Debate Score:19
Arguments:18
Total Votes:25
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 That's true (9)
 
 I'd be pissed anyway (5)

Debate Creator

Gremlin1(114) pic



If not for endless propaganda, you'd think the world was fine

That's true

Side Score: 11
VS.

I'd be pissed anyway

Side Score: 8
0 points

If not for endless propaganda, you'd think the world was fine

Hello G:

In my view, the world is in the worst shape it's been in for my entire life..

I HOPE it's the proverbial one step back before we take two steps forward.. But, I'm concerned that our decline is just starting..

excon

Side: That's true
1 point

In my view, the world is in the worst shape it's been in for my entire life..

You literally lived during the enforcement of Jim Crow Laws, the Cuban missile crisis, the Cold War, and the assassination of JFK. Jesus fucking Christ.

Side: I'd be pissed anyway
Bootstrap(226) Disputed
0 points

I HOPE it's the proverbial one step back before we take two steps forward.. But, I'm concerned that our decline is just starting.

You cheer and defend the exact same pyramid system which has fucked the world up in the first place, and attack its detractors and dissidents like they were plague victims. You are one of the very worst examples of what propaganda can do to the average mind.

Side: I'd be pissed anyway
outlaw60(15501) Disputed
0 points

STEVE INSKEEP to BOZO O'ROURKE : When you talk to scientists about what would be necessary to get to zero carbon emissions, they often talk about people having to change their daily behaviors. Drive an electric car. That's not such a bad change. Live in a smaller house. People might feel uncomfortable with that. Have fewer children. Eat less meat. Are you not going to demand any sacrifice from anyone in order to get to zero carbon emissions?

Talk about TOTALITARIAN PROPAGANDA there you have it !

Now for BOZO'S response - O'ROURKE: Yeah. We're going to have to make an investment as a country.

https://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=731458998

Side: I'd be pissed anyway
2 points

I AM pissed, anyway.

The endless propaganda is that we have a GREAT ECONOMY! An economy where well over 50% of Americans have a negative financial value, where a handful of families OWN over 40% of the Stock Market, where most American families RELY on two or more jobs to stay above water, where ONE illness or accident can mean bankruptcy, where the government we have is more concerned with a handful of corporations making more profit than they are whether your grandchildren have clean air, water and safe food to eat, can afford medicine if they get sick, a world where what WE do is devastating the OTHERS Stock Markets …. which ours will soon follow … where a WALL is more important than children dying or being forced into gangs we will HAVE to deal with eventually …. an endless paragraph showing that the endless propaganda from our dictator-in-chief is, well, propaganda! :-(

Side: I'd be pissed anyway
2 points

where a handful of families OWN over 40% of the Stock Market, where most American families RELY on two or more jobs to stay above water

Now now, Alfie. Brontraptor has explained to us many times that the people with two or three jobs are lazy, workshy loafers. Only the rich work hard. This is the Kool-Aid and by God YOU ARE GOING TO DRINK IT!!!

Side: I'd be pissed anyway
AlofRI(2858) Clarified
1 point

Glug...……....glug……..glug...……….glug...………..glug...……...burp. ;-)

Side: That's true
outlaw60(15501) Disputed
2 points

AL OF ROAD ISLAND your DNC MEDIA is an endless stream of PROPAGANDA but you are to IGNORANT to notice it. LMMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Side: That's true
FromWithin(8239) Disputed
1 point

WAIT! Did you just say you were worried about children dying, and children forced into Democrat controlled big inner city gangs?

It's you and the Democrat Party that supports killing viable children, for any reason, you mindless fool!

HYPOCRITE!

Side: That's true
AlofRI(2858) Clarified
1 point

Yes, I did say that. I always refer to "children" that have "lives". You are always referring to "viable" children that do not have a "life" yet. That's not me being a hypocrite, it's me having a different opinion on what a "life" is. I would consider myself a mindless fool if I thought "viable being" that was living a "viable life" was "living" a "life".

It's all a matter of perception. What do YOU think about an ACTUAL child dying?? One that has no chance at growing up, one that has been held by a mother, father, siblings. I guess you think it's O.K. for them to die as long as they're, maybe, from a …………. shithole country?? You think it's O.K. to send the older children back to the waiting arms of a gang that has killed MANY mothers carrying "viable" babies?? (as well as ACTUAL ones).

No. I have different priorities than you, but, YOU are the hypocrite. YOU want to protect "viable lives", I want to protect those WITH ACTUAL lives. HYPOCRITE!

Side: That's true
JustIgnoreMe(3633) Clarified
1 point

People can care about clean air and self-defense at the same time.

Side: That's true