If you call black people bongos, is that nice, or racist?
NICE
Side Score: 26
|
 |
RACIST
Side Score: 10
|
|
|
|
|
4
points
3
points
Racists are racists, whether from the left or from the right. I speak for me. You speak for you. Most Conservatives hate the Klan and get along with minorities well. That's not the part you care about. That narrative doesn't get your clan votes. That narrative would unite us all, but the left needs us divided for political expediency. You know it, and I know it. Side: NICE
Well, well, well. No sooner have I turned my back for a minute and the Bongo RACIST filth gets up to is up to his tricks. A Bongo is a Bongo is a Bongo. It's only a racist term if you want it to be. Frog=French person;- Problems= none. Limey= Englishman;- problems=none. A Mick;- An Irishman;- problems=none. Taffy;- A Welshman;- problems= none. Jock;- A Scotsman;- Problems= None. A Yank;- an American;- Problems= none. Bongo;- A black;- Problems=Indignation, blustering and bogus anti-racists like the site's resident RACIST trying to occupy the moral high ground by grandstanding his feigned concern for the poor down trodden Bongos. Excon, you're a phony low life RACIST BONGO who is becoming desperate to mask his own anti white bigotry. Side: NICE
Hello again, A: Let's review, shall we?? According to you, bongos have flared nostrils better suited for the jungle.. They have big lips, and wear bones in their noses.. They're inferior to the white man.. That's as RACIST as you get.. Now, you wanna PRETEND that you're NOT a racist sonofabitch, because Limey isn't racist?? WHO do you think you're fooling??? DUDE!.. Why don't you stand up and be PROUD of your hate?? Your Nazi brothers aren't ashamed of it.. excon Side: RACIST
How rich it is to note the site's official resident RACIST spewing out his incessant flow of feigned racial indignation when all the while he is the real, and only low life RACIST BIGOT' Your intolerable ignorance and shallow mind bears no equal. The description of the characteristic facial features of Negroes can only be interpreted as racist if the the observer wishes them to be. Bongos have 15 amp fuse wire hair,=so their sweat doesn't mat their hair as the run through the jungle in search of their prey. Bongos have big fanned nostrils so, if they lose sight of the prey in the dense jungle they can sniff the air and get a scent of their quarry's spoor. Bongos have big fat lips so, as they pursue their prey through the steaming hot jungle they can pluck some moisture rich fruit and quickly suck it's juices. What I want to know is what the hell are they doing in places like Chicago and Detroit wrecking the place. I thought that light hearted, but pertinent gag was quite amusing. Do you or did you never indulge in the telling of, or laughing at Irish jokes? You are truly a sanctimonious misfit who, due to your autism and deep seated RACISM cannot help but wallow in your own twisted interpretation of racism. Side: NICE
|
3
points
If you call white people crackers, is that nice, or racism? Hello RG: Since I'm white, it's definitely NOT racism.. But, it's not very nice.. So, show us the link.. I KNOW you got it in waiting... But, I'm NOT a racist so I KNOW you can't find posts wherein I was.. excon PS> So, you're beginning to follow me around like poochy boy and nom.. Are you obsessing with me now too? Cool.. Side: NICE
It's not impossible for it to be nice. If, for example, you were comparing every race to some sort of respectable animal, such as Asians are tigers, Caucasians are eagles, then you might be able to get away with Blacks are bongos, since technically that's a very beautiful antelope. http://www.awf.org/wildlife- However, in the absence of the broader context I posed, you are left with just one race being put up to comparison. And the item compared to could be also construed as a primitive drum then. Which makes it racist. Racist for singling out that race, and racist for potentially linking to a primitive musical instrument. Side: RACIST
Hello G: In the absence of a broader context, I agree - it COULD be nice.. But, when it's accompanied with a discussion about their flared nostrils, their big lips, the bones they wear in their noses, and their INABILITY to compete with the white man, one COULD ascertain that it's not very nice, indeed.. Unless, they're racists themselves, of course.. excon PS> Didn't mean to hit the dispute button. Side: RACIST
2
points
and their INABILITY to compete with the white man, one COULD ascertain that it's not very nice, indeed So if they can compete, we don't need affirmative action eh con? Why don't Asians, who were tossed in camps and Natives who were driven off their land and called savages and redskins get affirmative action? Please. Do tell. Side: NICE
|
