CreateDebate


Debate Info

7
11
support anonymity reject anonymity
Debate Score:18
Arguments:19
Total Votes:22
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 support anonymity (7)
 
 reject anonymity (11)

Debate Creator

dan2020(10) pic



Internet Identity: Anonymity or not

The Internet is a place where anyone can present themselves in any form they choose.

—But what happens when your digital identity begins to merge with your real-world identity?
—Are those who choose to hide their real names in danger of losing anonymity online?
—On the other hands, how anonymity enables cybercrime?
—How anonymity protects crime victims?

support anonymity

Side Score: 7
VS.

reject anonymity

Side Score: 11
1 point

In my opinion, anonymity is the only way to enable the freedom of speech. For example, in the mainland China, citizens are not likely to post something that opposes the Chinese government. It is because the account registry requires real name and the identity card number. It means every single word they wrote on the Internet is under the regulation of the government and hence they may get charged or punished due to their critics. Thus, I think that anonymity must be kept.

Side: support anonymity
1 point

€6堙:DAT?~7??ee遳筅vJZ嗔謖?!? 閑?a踼t0?s?<2葀??~棧忝���♂w贖鵁pa蘋汔.HU責Q€”i??幎?

Supporting Evidence: as (www.google.com)
Side: support anonymity
1 point

Full identity should be the standard criteria for anyone given access to all internet sites.

Correct name, home and email address, gender aa well as age should all be in the public domain.

If this were the case you'd see most cyber heros winding in their necks.

Side: support anonymity
0 points

Full identity should be the standard criteria for anyone given access to all internet sites.

Correct name, home and email address, gender aa well as age should all be in the public domain.

Really? After 75 years, 70 million dead and the demise of the third reich we are back to: "Show me your papers"? Sounds like great fun.

If this were the case you'd see most cyber heros winding in their necks.

Indeed. Ve must crush zis dissent.

Side: reject anonymity
1 point

După umila mea părere, sunt puține casinouri care oferă bonusuri grozave. Potrivit recenziilor iskrene Ice Casino 50 rotiri gratuite casino a fost în picioare pentru o periodadă destul de lungă de timp. s-ar putea să nu mă credeți, așa că în acest caz puteți citi recenzii https://ice-casino-ro.com/rotiri-gratuite/ reale.

Side: support anonymity
1 point

Honestly, there are few casinos that provide great bonuses. I'd highly recommend you to visit mr bet online casino to for the best gambling experience.Also, it's unbelievable https://mrbetcasino.ca/fr/ that I don't have to work for the whole day to have enough money.

Side: support anonymity
1 point

In my humble opinion, it's very hard to find a reputable and trustworthy online casino. I've been playing Vulkan Bet online casino provider for a long time and can't say anything bad about it.Here you can find everything you want from the table games to the most vulkanbet.me

popular slots worldwide.

Side: support anonymity

Absolutely 100 percent support it for political reasons. Without anonymity those acting on behalf of any dominant ideology are able to target and harass dissenters.

Obviously there is a flip side in that it potentially benefits criminals, as you mentioned, but nobody ever said freedom was free.

Side: support anonymity
1 point

Since everyone has to be responsible for your action and speech no matter it is in reality or in virtuality, we have to reject anonymity to protect the rights of everyone in case people commit crimes or there are victims.

Side: reject anonymity
1 point

In my opinion, anonymity is like a mask that people ware online.

People would potentially more tend to commit a crime when people feel that they can hide their real identity than when they live under their real identity.

Side: reject anonymity
1 point

I think it can decrease the cyber-crime if we reject anonymity

Side: reject anonymity
1 point

I think anonymity is one of the main causes of internet violence. Anonymous people are often not responsible for their comments on something.

Side: reject anonymity
1 point

There is a saying that people need not take responsibility online. People can say whatever they want without any concerns. In my opinion, it should be banned as it might lead to some cyberbullying or cybercrime. People think that they are lawless with anonymity which is not a good thing for the whole society.

Side: reject anonymity
1 point

It's easy to agree that, there are few casinos that provide great bonuses. I've been playing Hit n Spin Casino online casino provider for a long time and can't say anything bad https://hitnspin.casino/ about it.If you've been searching for the best casino it's a sign that you've found it.

Side: reject anonymity
1 point

I think anonymity is necessary to prevent crime, ID verification protect user for the security reason.

Side: reject anonymity
Mingiwuwu(1446) Clarified
1 point

You have just made a self-contradictory argument.

Side: support anonymity
1 point

I think we're still not as much as we want to be anonymous. New ways of hacking internet wallets, leaking information, and so on are constantly being invented. Only look at this: https://celltrackingapps.com/telegram-spy/ .

Side: reject anonymity
1 point

Para ser franco, no todos los casinos en línea son excelentes. Según los comentarios sinceros, el casino mr bet casinolleva mucho tiempo en pie. Si has estado buscando el mejor casino es señal de que lo has https://mrbetcasinos.cl/ encontrado.

Side: reject anonymity
0 points

I side against anonymity but I do enjoy abusing it.

Side: reject anonymity