CreateDebate


Debate Info

14
10
Yes. No.
Debate Score:24
Arguments:24
Total Votes:31
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes. (10)
 
 No. (8)

Debate Creator

Redeemed(1032) pic



Is FromWithin a bigot?

Yes.

Side Score: 14
VS.

No.

Side Score: 10
2 points

I think he genuinely doesn't realise that you can't say 'we aren't saying it's evil or wrong to be LGBT' and then call the encouragement of the future generation to not bully, thus to accept, LGBT people wholeheartedly as being 'brainwashing'. He will always go to the most extreme cases of transgenderism and abortion to make his points.

Side: Yes.
0 points

He is also bigoted against mentally disabled people, and prochoice people.

Side: Yes.
SunTzuv2(92) Clarified
2 points

I don't see him be bigoted against mentally disabled people. I understand why he is 'bigoted' against prochoice people, because he sees abortion as murder. The root of bigotry isn't the people they hate, it's the deeply irrational basis on which they go about determining what they care most about in the first place.

Side: Yes.
1 point

Absolutely. Of the highest order. There is nobody on this site (except maybe Bronto or ChinaMan) who is a bigger servant-bigot.

But the King-Bigot is "Antrim/CocoPops"

Side: Yes.
FerretHole(68) Clarified
1 point

Excon is a more illusive one but I have brought out his true bigotry recently, he admitted to being genocidal towards his political enemies and racist.

Side: Yes.
0 points

He uses hate speech too much..........................................................................................................................................................

Side: Yes.
1 point

Some of his aversions are reasonable but he presents his views too aggressively and unyielding thus instantly creating enemies. He also appears to lack the ability to present his angle persuasively and therefore unable to win support.

Side: No.
Redeemed(1032) Disputed
1 point

Not they aren't. He doesn't hate the right to say hateful things...........................................................

Side: Yes.
Saltal(90) Disputed
0 points

Hi there, I'm sure there is a meaning hidden somewhere in your statement but so far I'm unable to decipher the enigma-code. Would you please try again from a different angle, thank you.

Side: No.
FromWithin(7954) Disputed Banned
1 point

You have just said that my positions are reasonable but present them too aggressively.

Now let me explain, as I have before, how you are wrong about your assumptions.

Maybe you are new to this site, or maybe you are one of these hatefilled fools who create new aliases every week.

What you obviously do not understand is that the people I am aggressive with have been attacking me for years. They have proven to be deceptive liars over and over and over again.

There is no intelligent debate with liars so it always resorts to name calling and aggression. This is why I ban these people.

The person who created this debate stalks my every debate and post. She has told me to burn in Hell when I speak to her support of No Restriction abortions! Is that aggression? How would you handle that type of hate?

This same person creates debate after debate speaking to abortion but refuses to admit she supports No Restriction abortions when she votes for Democrats who vow to keep it legal.

I am not aggressive with civil honest people who are secure enough to admit the obvious.

I have presented my opinions with honesty and evidence proving my claims. Those who attack me never give reasons why I am supposedly wrong, because they know what I say is the truth. They attack, and attack and attack. I ban these waste time people. They can't stand being banned because it prevents them from spewing their insults and hatred towards the truth I speak.

THEY SELDOM ADDRESS THE TRUTH OF MY OPINIONS BECAUSE THAT WOULD BE ADMITTING THE OBVIOUS. They are too dishonest and insecure to ever admit the obvious.

So yes, I am aggressive with these hate filled people. There is no winning them over with the truth because they are too insecure to admit what they support.

Side: Yes.
Saltal(90) Disputed
2 points

Any dispassionate observer would class you, and not I as a ''hate filled fool''.

With the greatest respect please accept that the AGGRESSIVE rant in the opening paragraphs of your post confirms my point.

There was no malice in my comment and I am not a hate filled alias.

Side: No.
Redeemed(1032) Disputed
1 point

You don't have the right to say hateful things about my disabilities..........................................................................................................

Side: No.
1 point

Tell Mommy to go get you some smokes you disabled Democrat.

Side: No.
Redeemed(1032) Disputed
1 point

You don't have the right to say that, bitch! I wish I could bash your face in, you cunt, reported for hate speech.

Side: Yes.