CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
Any anthropologist will tell you that Jesus couldn't possibly have had blond hair, blue eyes and fair skin, that's all a fiction. The people who lived in or near Israel at that time were brown skinned dark haired people. They looked more like Africans than Europeans. So Jesus has been whitened and why? Because racism and white supremacy is involved. I'm not saying that it's intentional or overt, it's just something that has evolved but that doesn't make it right.
Go ahead and freak out, I like it. I never said anything about Japanese Jesus or any of the other non-sense you're spouting but reel away just the same, it's all entertaining.
Click on the link to see what Jesus most likely looked like, assuming he ever existed to begin with.
I never saw that face on the wall at grandma's house.
Go ahead and freak out, I like it. I never said anything about Japanese Jesus or any of the other non-sense you're spouting but reel away just the same, it's all entertaining.
It doesn't look like he freaked out. It looks like he squashed your claim that a Jesus who matches your race is racist.
Click on the link to see what Jesus most likely looked like, assuming he ever existed to begin with.
Seeing the Roman Empire was multicultural, there's no way to assume what he looked like. Why would you assume whether he existed or not when you don't assume concerning anyone else in ancient history?
It doesn't look like he freaked out. It looks like he squashed your claim that a Jesus who matches your race is racist.
Actually, it looks like you are the exact same insane Jew who keeps swapping accounts and agreeing with his own lies. That's what it looks like. As Rusticus rightly pointed out, he said nothing about Japanese Jesus or any of your other infantile straw man arguments.
Oh, OK. So you have no claim to the land then? It was multicultural and Jews are a real religion/fake race.
Then Palestinians have no claim to it, so since Israelis are there, they own it now. It was just a landrun that happened in 1948 on unclaimed land. The Palestinians should have participated in said landrun. They didn't because the term Palestinian wad made up by Arafat.
Lol. Right, so denying that Palestinians have been living on that land for at least seven centuries is your explanation for why Jews are entitled to Israel. Good one, idiot.
Lol. Wait, so if the land was unclaimed then how was Churchill able to give it to the Jews?
So you admit that your hero gave the land to the Jews. Your hero that's statue has to be protected from the modern Aryan leftists that he fought in WW2.
How many admissions have you ever heard which were phrased as a question?
If the land was unclaimed as you say, then Churchill had no right to give it to the Jews, did he? Hence, Israel is illegal and you should pat yourself on the shoulder for proving that.
Jesus is a symbol of whatever one wants to make of the name. There are SOO many "interpretations" of what he (allegedly) said and did ... and NO ONE REALLY knows. There are NO photos, no recordings, no actual FACTS. Far more factual, or provable things are thrown out of our courts as "hearsay". So, you can symbolize all you want and nobody can stop you ... if you do no harm.
In answer to the question, I say no, but, there are those who will make of it what they will, and nobody can PROVE otherwise.... 'cause it's all hearsay.
Jesus is a symbol of whatever one wants to make of the name. There are SOO many "interpretations" of what he (allegedly) said and did ... and NO ONE REALLY knows. There are NO photos, no recordings, no actual FACTS.
How do you know the New Testament and the claims about Jesus from the time that are not Christian based, are not factual?
How do you know the New Testament and the claims about Jesus from the time that are not Christian based, are not factual?
We discovered something in the interim called the laws of physics. You obviously missed that though, given that you apparently do not understand which direction time travels in.
We discovered something in the interim called the laws of physics. You obviously missed that though, given that you apparently do not understand which direction time travels in.
How does Physics or the direction time travels in contradict that Jesus existed?
He uses word salads when he doesn't know what to say. That's why his response doesn't apply to the topic, reality or common sense.
Why do you reply to your own posts you pointlessly stupid, infantile twit? You're a fucking idiot Bronto. You are stupid and you are incapable of being honest about anything.
How do YOU know they are?? Do you have a Bible signed by Jesus? A video, maybe? Some legal documents... witnessed? Were you there??
Religious people definitely tend to jump the gun a bit. No evidence for anything, but you'll find millions of preachers willing to tell you what God thinks and what God wants.
There's plenty of evidence for leftism. You'd know that if you'd ever been to university and studied, or in fact ever read anything more advanced than a children's book.
You'd also know to stick to the subject instead of using everything you read as a springboard for an attack against the left like the insane fascist wanker you are.
No. Yeshua, whom you call Jesus, is a brown skinned Sephardic Jewish Carpenter Rabbi, born of a Virgin. Yeshua said in John 7:24, to judge not according to appearance, but judge with righteous judgement. This prevents judging, by skin color. Also, Acts 17:26 says, that God hath made from one blood all the nations of men, to dwell upon the earth. That means all skin colors, are one human race. Another point is, judging with partiality, is condemned, in the Bible.
what the heck, Jesus would have been a black man how the HECK is he a symbol of white supremacy? Jesus teaches to love thy neighbor, no matter the race, so idk who asked this, but why is this even debatable?!?
