CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:40
Arguments:15
Total Votes:47
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
  (21)

Debate Creator

EnigmaticMan(1840) pic



Is Qymosabi a bigoted hypocrite?

Qymosabi has created many debates concerning black rights and the abolishment of racism. Ironically, in every one he posts derogatory and generalising comments about white people. Do you find this a bit hypocritical?

Add New Argument
4 points

Think of Kinda, but to a bigger extreme.

The dude's an idiot.

But I'm pretty sure he's some kind of troll. Either that, or one of those guys who have a certain belief system and then decide to fuck with us by taking it to an extreme just because in general, Authoritarian arguments suck and they know they can't come up with anything good.

It wouldn't surprise me if he refers to "Rules for Radicals" when making his arguments.

Side: Radical Troll
1 point

Absolutely agree. I am under the impression he is just looking for attention.

Side: Radical Troll

If you take him at face value, then yes, obviously he's a bigoted hypocrite, but in my opinion, the more likely scenario is that he's just a troll.

Side: Radical Troll
TERMINATOR(6781) Disputed
2 points

It would seem that the common consensus on here is that anybody that the liberals don't like is a troll.

Typical arrogant liberal behaviour.

Side: Radical Troll
2 points

I do like him, and I'm not a liberal

----------------------------------

Side: Radical Troll

The following are all statements made by Qymosabi at one point or another:

"there are only 2 times in the old testament that God cursed a mans skin and both times the curse was leprosy the result of the curse is the turning of the skin white."

---------------------------------

"This also explains why they [whites] are so covetous and violent...it's that Cain Gene in them."

---------------------------------

""ARE THERE ANY GOOD DECENT CHRISTIAN WHITE PEOPLE OUT THERE? WHERE THE HELL ARE YOU?"

---------------------------------

" WONDER who has the money and networking ability to pump uhauls of drugs into america...oh,my bad..its whites"

---------------------------------

"whites talk a good game but they really don't like to see blacks helping each other."

---------------------------------

"The Brits use to set the table but now... their just eating leftovers."

---------------------------------

"I have "never" and will never ever support Black Supremacy"

I wonder about that last one.

Side: yes
2 points

I find this enormously hypocritical! Many a time, I have been the one these "arguments" have been directed at. He (and many others) are slowly changing the "racism status quo". What I mean by this, is that while in the past, racism was almost always directed at blacks, Mexicans, and other foreign peoples. Now, it seems as though they feel the need to even he score and be racist against whites (Affirmative action, etc.).

Side: yes
2 points

Is it just me or do you find him talking some liberal crap? His profile says he's a conservative and a republican but his arguments and debates say otherwise.

Side: yes
2 points

He seems utterly incapable of looking at the world outside of the spectrum of black and white. It is quite confusing. On the one hand he espouses equality, which in his mind he believes his arguments represent, then will in the same debate explain how the world would be better if blacks and whites were segregated to the extreme - as in black people get their own island or something. This of course is quite racist - not to mention it would rip apart families and couples, and leave the country a far worse place all around. These things I do not believe occur to him.

It is almost like some form of racism OCD. I'm convinced he's insane - which may or may not be a defense for racism.

Upon explaining that all colors of people are perfectly capable of living together, and that there is no inherent difference from one human to another outside of social construct, he banned me from the debate explaining I was being racist.

I still do not understand the logic of that, but it is apparent he has some wires crossed in his brain.

This is unfortunate because he actually has some decent insight here and there, always though race encroaches even solid, well argued opinions on his part when he stays with the arguement for any amount of time. Like a disease, or spreading cancer to the brain which will only allow so many synapses to fire before... tainting it.

It is sad.

Side: sad

Upon explaining that all colors of people are perfectly capable of living together, and that there is no inherent difference from one human to another outside of social construct, he banned me from the debate explaining I was being racist.

He once wrote that India's biggest problem is that Indians are cowardly. I challenged him, calling him racist, but he denied it and threw about 6 definitions at me. Apparently, cowardice does not imply "inferiority". Ironically, when I pointed out that it does, he didn't reply. I also have an ongoing debate with Kinda (He believes white people are all barbarians) and Qymosabi supports him. I doubt he even read Kinda's arguments. He knows Kinda is "brown", therefore he must support him.

Side: sad

So true. I have an on going argument with Kinda. He said white people are "pussy-er" than other races. I challenged him and am waiting for a reply. I am not trying to be racist by this.

Side: sad
2 points

In modern society - or, at least, American society - racism on the part of white people against blacks is wholly unacceptable. However, in this evil nation, black people can say anything they want about white people and society accepts that.

Obama, for instance, went to a black radical church (some described it as a cult in which all things Negro were worshipped); nobody cared. If a white candidate went to a white radical church, where all things Aryan were worshipped, he's be labelled a neo-Nazi and have been loathed and declared a 'racist'.

Side: sad
2 points

I move that Qymosabi be ignored by everyone from this point on.

Either he's a troll, in which case there's no point in talking to him; or he's insane, in which case there's no point in talking to him.

Side: sad
1 point

Ha-ha. I wasn't sure if this was a serious debate, and now I can see that it actually is.

I'd agree that he is rather hypocritical in the sense that he is an extremist in the common grounds of arguing. He presents clear and loud reasons as to why an opposing side is wrong, but in fact does little to present his own. This isn't an isolated incident either; he has clearly drawn is rage towards individuals in separate debates and has continued to "have a go" at others for the simple reason of having an opposing opinion.

Black or not (which is rather irrelevant) he clearly wants to draw the race card here, and it is amusing to even see colour appear in this debate on character. I'm white and an Australian, but I don't start calling out these facts when people have a go at me.

I have had my arguments with him and judging from them I'd have to conclude that he either is a very desperate man in need of a lot of attention, or has some form of anger issue and cannot be bothered to take it out on people in his life away from his keyboard and mouse. I wouldn't be surprised if his personal chair (being the one he uses with his PC) could be otherwise referred to as his habitat, but let's not get too carried away.

So in my opinion, he is.

Side: yes
1 point

qymosabi is still an idiot he likes to do racism he adds points to his data who is qymosabi he is a bad fat idiot person

Side: yes