CreateDebate


Debate Info

12
52
Yes No
Debate Score:64
Arguments:38
Total Votes:80
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes (12)
 
 No (24)

Debate Creator

excon(18260) pic



Is Roe V Wade headed for the trash heap? Is same sex marriage doomed?


Yes

Side Score: 12
VS.

No

Side Score: 52

Does it matter Roe Vs Wade is a Civil case based on patient privacy, yet the medical profession is openly asked to violated the Hippocratic Oath by insistence for immunity to a public admissions of guilt. However intellectual well worded it is made. The public just doesn’t deserve to be caught in the intellectual lie abortion creates as a self-incrimination by admission to crime. A common defense is abortion is a lie and what was taking place was a form of female specific amputation.

As for same sex marriage. It is at best a plagiarism against marriage the problem is the governing should have better regulated the likely-hood from the start. Gay and Lesbian are not just a person’s choice they had been an accusation. At the same time marriage is a likely-hood which sets a registration along with civil union and common law marriage to citizen ship as a common defense to the general welfare.

The civil action creates a question to perjury and obstruction of justice by manipulating a witness account.

Side: Yes
-2 points
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
1 point

http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-pol-virginia-shooter-profile-20170614-story.html

Now this link shows the violent nature of Socialist !!!!!! Cannot deny that fact Rusty !

Side: No
Agent6(18) Disputed
1 point

I hope it will be overturned. The societal upheaval to follow will bring about some good things such as the end of the shit stain we know as the GOP.

The ol "chop off my nuts for the good of society" philosophy. In real life, you'd just wind up with no nuts.

Side: No

No. The conservatives already on the court themselves aren't for abolishing it.

Side: No

Roe v. Wade is more than settled as precedent

SEN. SPECTER [as read into the record by Sen. Feinstein]: “Judge Roberts, in your confirmation hearing for the circuit court you testified: ‘Roe is the settled law of the land.’ Do you mean settled for you, settled only for your capacity as a circuit judge, or settled beyond that?”

ROBERTS: “Well, beyond that. It’s settled as a precedent of the court, entitled to respect under principles of stare decisis. And those principles, applied in the Casey case, explain when cases should be revisited and when they should not. And it is settled as a precedent of the court, yes.“

SPECTER: ”You went on to say then, ‘It’s a little more than settled. It was reaffirmed in the face of a challenge that it should be overruled in the Casey decision, so it has added precedental value.’“

ROBERTS: ”I think the initial question for the judge confronting an issue in this area, you don’t go straight to the Roe decision. You begin with Casey, which modified the Roe framework and reaffirmed its central holding.“

http://www.ontheissues.org/Court/JohnRobertsAbortion.htm

There. I did in 30 seconds what CNN couldn't do in days. Probably why they have 700,000 viewers in a country of 350 million.

Side: No
excon(18260) Disputed
0 points

Roe v. Wade is more than settled as precedent

Hello bront:

It IS settle law.. Nonetheless, I believe it will be overturned...

What??? The ONLY reason Evangelics voted for Trump is a REVERSAL of both Roe, and same sex marriage.. They will NOT be satisfied with your logic..

excon

Side: Yes
5 points

Stare decisis is first step; abortion

SEN. DURBIN: When Senator Schumer asked you repeatedly, “Do you find that Roe v. Wade established and recognized a constitutional protection for a woman to make this most private decision?,” you wouldn’t answer. You wouldn’t give a direct answer.

ALITO: What I have said about Roe is that if it were -- if the issue were to come before me, if I’m confirmed and I’m on the Supreme Court and the issue comes up, the first step in the analysis for me would be the issue of stare decisis. And that would be very important. If I were to get beyond that, I would approach that question the way I approach every legal issue that I approach as a judge, and that is to approach it with an open mind and to go through the whole judicial process, which is designed, and I believe strongly in it, to achieve good results, to achieve good decision-making.

http://www.ontheissues.org/Court/SamuelAlitoAbortion.htm

Side: No
5 points

sta·re de·ci·sis

ˌsterē dəˈsīsəs/Submit

nounLAW

the legal principle of determining points in litigation according to precedent.

Side: No
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
1 point

It IS settle law.. Nonetheless, I believe it will be overturned...

What??? The ONLY reason Evangelics voted for Trump is a REVERSAL of both Roe, and same sex marriage.. They will NOT be satisfied with your logic..

excon

The Socialist comes along FULL of FEAR and ZERO facts LMMFAO

Side: No
marcusmoon(576) Disputed
1 point

The ONLY reason Evangelics voted for Trump is a REVERSAL of both Roe, and same sex marriage.

Dude,

You are sooo wrong about this. Evangelicals need jobs and want lower taxes just like anybody else.

As much to the point, Hillary is so dislikeable that Evangelicals (like almost half of Trump voters) voted for Trump regardless of his SCOTUS choices or economic policies, just to avoid electing someone as personally loathsome and demonstrably corrupt as Hillary.

Side: No

I don't believe that Roe V Wade is going away any time soon, although I wish it would. As for same-sex marriage, I couldn't say. Considering LQBTQ+ people count for something around 2% of Americans, I can see how their voices would be deafened. However, I don't think that the state should handle marriage in any capacity.

Side: No