CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
Does it matter Roe Vs Wade is a Civil case based on patient privacy, yet the medical profession is openly asked to violated the Hippocratic Oath by insistence for immunity to a public admissions of guilt. However intellectual well worded it is made. The public just doesn’t deserve to be caught in the intellectual lie abortion creates as a self-incrimination by admission to crime. A common defense is abortion is a lie and what was taking place was a form of female specific amputation.
As for same sex marriage. It is at best a plagiarism against marriage the problem is the governing should have better regulated the likely-hood from the start. Gay and Lesbian are not just a person’s choice they had been an accusation. At the same time marriage is a likely-hood which sets a registration along with civil union and common law marriage to citizen ship as a common defense to the general welfare.
The civil action creates a question to perjury and obstruction of justice by manipulating a witness account.
SEN. SPECTER [as read into the record by Sen. Feinstein]: “Judge Roberts, in your confirmation hearing for the circuit court you testified: ‘Roe is the settled law of the land.’ Do you mean settled for you, settled only for your capacity as a circuit judge, or settled beyond that?”
ROBERTS: “Well, beyond that. It’s settled as a precedent of the court, entitled to respect under principles of stare decisis. And those principles, applied in the Casey case, explain when cases should be revisited and when they should not. And it is settled as a precedent of the court, yes.“
SPECTER: ”You went on to say then, ‘It’s a little more than settled. It was reaffirmed in the face of a challenge that it should be overruled in the Casey decision, so it has added precedental value.’“
ROBERTS: ”I think the initial question for the judge confronting an issue in this area, you don’t go straight to the Roe decision. You begin with Casey, which modified the Roe framework and reaffirmed its central holding.“
SEN. DURBIN: When Senator Schumer asked you repeatedly, “Do you find that Roe v. Wade established and recognized a constitutional protection for a woman to make this most private decision?,” you wouldn’t answer. You wouldn’t give a direct answer.
ALITO: What I have said about Roe is that if it were -- if the issue were to come before me, if I’m confirmed and I’m on the Supreme Court and the issue comes up, the first step in the analysis for me would be the issue of stare decisis. And that would be very important. If I were to get beyond that, I would approach that question the way I approach every legal issue that I approach as a judge, and that is to approach it with an open mind and to go through the whole judicial process, which is designed, and I believe strongly in it, to achieve good results, to achieve good decision-making.
Conservative Judges always lie during Senate confirmation hearings. They're all choir boys when they're sitting in front of the Senate and they all say the same things about stare decisis. They say they'll just call balls and strikes like a good little judge is supposed to do but once they're safely on the court they do the exact opposite and nobody can do anything about it because the lying scumbags are there for life.
True to their conservative nature, the vile conservative bastards ruled for Citizens United which is an unprecedented betrayal of my country and (not sure what country you're in but I'm thinking probably Russia) Citizens United will eventually choke this country to death.
They rip and tear through settled law every chance they get. Get real for once. You've won, why not wallow in the glory? Now you get to watch Putin, Trump and all the rest of the fat cats dance their way through the wreckage while they do a proper beatdown of the American working class. You should be thrilled.
Conservative Judges always lie during Senate confirmation hearings. They're all choir boys when they're sitting in front of the Senate and they all say the same things about stare decisis. They say they'll just call balls and strikes like a good little judge is supposed to do but once they're safely on the court they do the exact opposite and nobody can do anything about it because the lying scumbags are there for life.
True to their conservative nature, the vile conservative bastards ruled for Citizens United which is an unprecedented betrayal of my country and (not sure what country you're in but I'm thinking probably Russia) Citizens United will eventually choke this country to death.
They rip and tear through settled law every chance they get. Get real for once. You've won, why not wallow in the glory? Now you get to watch Putin, Trump and all the rest of the fat cats dance their way through the wreckage while they do a proper beatdown of the American working class. You should be thrilled.
Not much said about the Obama appointees to the SCOTUS and why might that be??
The ONLY reason Evangelics voted for Trump is a REVERSAL of both Roe, and same sex marriage.
Dude,
You are sooo wrong about this. Evangelicals need jobs and want lower taxes just like anybody else.
As much to the point, Hillary is so dislikeable that Evangelicals (like almost half of Trump voters) voted for Trump regardless of his SCOTUS choices or economic policies, just to avoid electing someone as personally loathsome and demonstrably corrupt as Hillary.
just to avoid electing someone as personally loathsome and demonstrably corrupt as Hillary
Lol. Shut up Marcus.
Firstly, no neutral observer would attempt to deny that Trump is loathsome and corrupt. You are talking about a 70 year old pensioner who brags about grabbing pussies, marries gold diggers half his age, has been accused of rape at least four times and rips off his own workers.
Secondly, if you could demonstrate that Hillary was corrupt she would obviously be in jail. You are abusing language again because you are biased to the point of stupidity.
Firstly, no neutral observer would attempt to deny that Trump is loathsome and corrupt.
Agreed. 2016 was about choosing the lesser of two evils. Hard as it is to believe, Trump was actually the more likeable of the two. Bernie could have walked away with the presidential election if Hillary had not rigged the convention. I cannot think of anything more immoral or disastrous than socialism, but I would have voted for Sanders over Trump, and hoped that Congress would have made him a four year lame duck.
Secondly, if you could demonstrate that Hillary was corrupt she would obviously be in jail.
Comey's testimony to the Congressional Oversight Committee was that she put classified information on her unsecured server (a felony), that she lied to the FBI (a felony), refused to comply with the subpoena to turn the server over to the FBI, and destroyed evidence in the mean time (obstruction of justice).
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dax8KvfPXPI)
The fact that she was not charged is further proof of corruption. The FBI made their minds up before interviewing her to let her off.
In your own words, you are abusing language again because you are biased to the point of stupidity.
I like debating with adults, so wait for your testicles to descend before you post again.
Firstly, no neutral observer would attempt to deny that Trump is loathsome and corrupt.
Agreed. 2016 was about choosing the lesser of two evils. Hard as it is to believe, Trump was actually the more likeable of the two. Bernie could have walked away with the presidential election if Hillary had not rigged the convention. I cannot think of anything more immoral or disastrous than socialism, but I would have voted for Sanders over Trump, and hoped that Congress would have made him a four year lame duck.
Will tell me Socialist where Socialism works ?????????
If you agree then why were they the adjectives you used to describe Hillary Clinton? Why were they the words you used to illustrate the benefits of Trump over Clinton?
You are just basically completely full of shit, aren't you?
Comey's testimony to the Congressional Oversight Committee was that she put classified information on her unsecured server (a felony), that she lied to the FBI (a felony), refused to comply with the subpoena to turn the server over to the FBI, and destroyed evidence in the mean time (obstruction of justice).
Your first claim was untrue, and this steaming pile of biased, one-sided nonsense does not make it true. If Hillary was guilty of corruption then she would be in jail. If you want to play tit-for-tat then Donald Trump received a subpoena to appear in court charged with forcibly raping a 12 year old girl and threatening to kill her family if she told anyone.
If you agree then why were they the adjectives you used to describe Hillary Clinton? Why were they the words you used to illustrate the benefits of Trump over Clinton?
You are just basically completely full of shit, aren't you?
So name us some things better about Clinton than Trump.
Hillary is demonstrably guilty of corruption. She has changed her position dozens of times in direct accordance with the poll numbers, which proves she will say anything to get a vote. She has taken money from corrupt lobbyists and bought herself votes and super delegates, she runs a fraud charity that barely does anything for those in need. She even sold our military secrets to foreign powers according to wkileaks.
Can't name us anything she would have done better politically eh nom? I figured. We both know that unemployment wouldn't be at a record low, and rather than a 24,000-26,000 DOW, it'd be sitting at 18,000 or lower.
Comey's testimony to the Congressional Oversight Committee was that she put classified information on her unsecured server (a felony), that she lied to the FBI (a felony), refused to comply with the subpoena to turn the server over to the FBI, and destroyed evidence in the mean time (obstruction of justice).
Your first claim was untrue
Everything in the dialogue is demonstrably true.
and this steaming pile of biased, one-sided nonsense does not make it true. If Hillary was guilty of corruption then she would be in jail.
If Trump was guilty of collusion, he'd be in jail...
If you want to play tit-for-tat then Donald Trump received a subpoena to appear in court charged with forcibly raping a 12 year old girl and threatening to kill her family if she told anyone.
Conjecture, and Hillary laughed about getting a child rapist off of rape charges, which isn't conjecture.
No, it is not "demonstrably true", as was pointed out at the very beginning of this conversation had you bothered to read or acknowledge what was written before opening your big stupid mouth. You are abusing words and telling lies because you are an annoying Nazi prick. It's really that simple.
Conjecture
I conjectured the subpoena? Wtf? Just shut up. You're an idiot. Go play with your Lego or something, you twisted Zionist douchebag.
If you agree then why were they the adjectives you used to describe Hillary Clinton?
Learn to read, and put some effort into thinking.
- 1 - It is entirely possible for two people to share similar faults.
- 2 - It is also entirely possible for two people to be flawed, but one still be better than the other. Hence the existence of the phrase "lesser of two evils."
I don't believe that Roe V Wade is going away any time soon, although I wish it would. As for same-sex marriage, I couldn't say. Considering LQBTQ+ people count for something around 2% of Americans, I can see how their voices would be deafened. However, I don't think that the state should handle marriage in any capacity.