Is Susan Rice the best person for National Security Advisor?
In light of the controversy about Benghazi, do you think Obama's choice to appoint Susan Rice as National Security Advisor is appropriate?
Fox News report: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/06/05/susan-rice-to-replace-donilon-as-national-security-adviser/
CNN report: http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/05/politics/rice-national-security/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
Best for the position
Side Score: 3
|
 |
Appointed for other reasons
Side Score: 8
|
|
|
|
|
1
point
I think she is a fine choice. She is incredibly smart and I am sure she has learned from her mistakes. " When a very intelligent person, and there's no question about that with regard to Rice (a former national merit scholar and Rhodes Scholar), makes a mistake that big and that public, the likelihood of learning from it is pretty high." - William Bradley, Huffpost.com I believe she has the skill set for the job and I believe she will do great. She wouldnt dare repeat the same mistake again. Here is a link to the article I pulled the quote out of: http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/3392508 Side: Best for the position
I have no doubt she is intelligent, and could do a decent job. However, she can not be taken seriously. She could have learned from her mistakes, but society is not so forgiving of mistakes. No one would take her seriously. I think there is another motive, either to stick it to Republicans, or some other agenda. Side: Appointed for other reasons
1
point
I have no doubt she is intelligent, and could do a decent job. Yes. That is why I believe she is a good choice
However, she can not be taken seriously Because of the Bengazi lie? I know she messed up. But the thing is that she has the intelligence and the perfect skill set for the job. We are going to have to take her seriously. She wouldnt make the same mistake twice. That is insanity. She could have learned from her mistakes, but society is not so forgiving of mistakes. I believe you. But we have to move on from her past and what happened. We cannot keep holding on to the past. We have to keep moving forward. No one would take her seriously. I think there is another motive, either to stick it to Republicans, or some other agenda. I think he mostly picked her for her smarts and what she is capable of. I think she can do a great job just from her skill set. Side: Best for the position
1
point
|
2
points
1
point
|
