Is involving ''God'' into all debates caused by lack of debating skills by the christians?
When examined, the ontological argument reverts the notion of God into beliefs-properly-so-called. That means that they can neither be proven or disproven. These beliefs are also the base beliefs for everything: whether reality is just a dream, whether logic is trustworthy, etc. Therefore, because God is reverted into beliefs-properly-so-called, it follows that a Christian's entire worldview is based in God. It has nothing to do with a lack of debating skills. Eh, disagreement and what not. Lolzors and I have already talked about it, but if anyone reading this would like to debate the ontological argument, or would like me to explain why it is easily dismissed, message me. Much love Lolzors, I agree that involving God has nothing to do with debating skills. Well that depends, can you go fuck yourself? ... Just look at the video ... 1
point
|