Well that's the crux.

Who's good and who's bad? What's good and what's bad? Is there any such thing?

Let me give you a link to this article This is what is meant by absolute Truth. (capitalized, or just 'T' if you're a philosopher.)

The notion of the existance of a Judea/Christian type god demands that there be an absolute truth. So does logic. So does math. Here's an example if you didn't follow the link.

"There's no such thing as absolute Truth."

Which means the statement "There's no such thing as absolute Truth," is not absolutely true. The link is actually wrong to say it means it then must be false, it only must not be necessarily true, which could still leave room for "T" or not. A circle basically, which is why people still argue about it. Religious types (where the 'god is truth' thing came from) took it to mean that if there must be T (again refering to the logical fallacy I pointed out in the article) then there must be a god.

Well it gets to be a little annoying, kind of fun though, if you like torture and riddles.

... not really the point of the question I think though.

My arguement never was whether or not 'T' exists, or about good or evil. Simply that you cannot define any type of god as "Truth," only mention that as a characteristic of said god.

Now if you're asking me "who's the bad guy?" I would say there is no such thing.

But that's an even longer arguement that has absolutely nothing to do with forgiveness, religion, sin, crime, child abuse, rape, murder, or anything else people will begin spewing off as soon as they hear, "there's no such thing as the bad guy."

Quickly though because I have to leave and don't want to give you a drunk answer at 3am:

It seems that all great things first have to bestride the earth in monstrous and frightening masks in order to inscribe themselves in the hearts of humanity with eternal demands: dogmatic philosophy was such a mask... the worst, most durable, and most dangerous of all errors so far was a dogmatist's error - namely Plato's invention of the pure spirit (mind) and the good as such" - Nietzsche

Our society deems, and it is a beneficial and healthy thing that we do such, that some things are "bad" and some things are "good" and it is "good" to be "one (who) is honest and doesn't take, but gives.." as you say.

This is because we have made it such.

Things are not bad or good. They simply are. Same with people. And same with a god if he exists somewhere.

This isn't an excuse to behave in destructive and anti-social ways, just a statement of fact. The idea that we are somehow knowledgable enough of the state of being, or that we're bright enough to figure out without such knowledge, the nature of good and evil, what's right an wrong, is silly.

"It's evil to murder a person."

Okay, what if that person was about to kill a turkey for dinner, the turkey wouldn't think the murderer was evil, the turkey would (if it was bright enough) think that person was a hero.

Relative. Now we're the only creature on this planet with enough brains to ever even come close to such a distinction, but hopefully you get the point.

We simply try and do what is most beneficial to the most people, and call those things good. Sometimes it gets turned around, but for the most part that's all.