Is it tyranny to investigate someone without naming the alleged crime?
Obviously
Side Score: 14
|
 |
Stalin runs the left
Side Score: 7
|
|
|
|
|
1
point
Undeniable proof that Brontoraptor is a dangerous paedophile:- Nom: So you support making sexually provocative comments to young children, you disgusting little Nazi paedophile scumbag?? Brontoraptor: Yes. You should be able to say whatever you want regardless of what it is. http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/ Side: Stalin runs the left
Is it tyranny to investigate someone without naming the alleged crime? Hello bront: Naming to who?? The media? FOX News? The guy on the corner? The cops don't announce WHO they're investigating or WHY, and it's nuts to think they should.. There ARE predicates to an investigation, but it's also nuts to think they need to be divulged. If the predicates are to be made public, the TRIAL is where that happens.. You know what a predicate is, right? Nahhh, you don't know or you wouldn't have asked the question you did.. excon Side: Stalin runs the left
1
point
1
point
Undeniable proof that Brontoraptor is a dangerous paedophile:- Nom: So you support making sexually provocative comments to young children, you disgusting little Nazi paedophile scumbag?? Brontoraptor: Yes. You should be able to say whatever you want regardless of what it is. http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/ Side: Stalin runs the left
1
point
The cops don't announce WHO they're investigating or WHY, and it's nuts to think they should Actually you can't investigate someone without cause and/or a warrant. Probable cause" generally refers to the requirement in criminal law that police have adequate reason to arrest someone, conduct a search, or seize property relating to an alleged crime. This requirement comes from the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which states that: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be searched." https://criminal.findlaw.com/ Side: Obviously
1
point
1
point
If the predicates are to be made public, the TRIAL is where that happens.. It's already a "trial". They're literally attempting to subpoena people, documents and records, and hold people in contempt... You know what a predicate is, right? Nahhh, you don't know or you wouldn't have asked the question you did.. Yes. Bill Barr used the word many times. Democrats seemed confused... Side: Obviously
Hay IDIOT make some sense there BRONTO TROLL !!!!!!!!!!! pred·i·cate nounGRAMMAR /ˈpredəkət/ 1. the part of a sentence or clause containing a verb and stating something about the subject (e.g., went home in John went home ). "predicate adjective" verb /ˈpredəˌkāt/ 1. GRAMMAR•LOGIC state, affirm, or assert (something) about the subject of a sentence or an argument of a proposition. "a word that predicates something about its subject" 2. found or base something on. "the theory of structure on which later chemistry was predicated" synonyms: base, be dependent, found, establish, rest, build, ground, premise "all the social sciences are predicated on the notion that individuals are not isolated" Side: Obviously
|
